The real criminals are those @Snowden exposed: the security state officials like James Clapper and John Brennan who illegally and unconstitutionally spied on innocent people by the millions, and who still seek to do so. And they lied about it to the public.
"A US appellate court in September unanimously ruled the NSA’s program mass domestic surveillance program was illegal, as well as likely a violation of the 4th Amendment. The court, and the broader public, knew about this illegal surveillance by NSA only because of Snowden."
"So many of the arguments against pardoning Snowden’s, and demanding his lifelong imprisonment or exile come from the very security state operatives whose crimes he exposed." And they exclusively rely on demonstrable lies about him to make their case.
A pardon of Snowden by Donald Trump would be one of the greatest blows against Deep State abuse of secrecy and spying power in decades. It'd prompt bipartisan cheering across the U.S. and would engender support globally across the ideological spectrum.
3 facts about WikiLeaks which those who want Assange to rot in jail have buried:
1) WL redacted documents when publishing Iraq & Afghanistan War Logs & diplomatic cables to protect the innocent; 2) WL requested Hillary's State Dept to help in redacting: they refused; 3) This:
The chances are very high that if Trump doesn't pardon Assange and put a stop to the insane attempt to extradite him to the US, then he will die in a UK prison, convicted of nothing, with a very dangerous precedent pending.
That arouses liberals, but it's profoundly unjust.
NBC News: "Release WikiLeaks' Julian Assange, say current and former world leaders"
Signatories of an open letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson included the president of Argentina and two former presidents of Brazil.
Good @washingtonpost article on how and why the popularity of Bolsonaro -- despite insane levels of ineptitude and corruption -- is remaining reasonably stable. Among other things, he tried to stop or limit direct payments, but then took credit for them when they passed.
Most of Brazil's corporate media is 100% unified against Bolsonaro, denouncing him in increasingly virulent ways. But it doesn't matter. Once the establishment loses the population's trust, they'll support anyone they view as its enemy. This lesson needs to be learned everywhere.
As I've written before, we personally know many who are gay, black/brown, from favelas, etc. who voted for Bolsonaro. They did it not because of but despite his ugly rhetoric. They lost all faith in the ruling class & turned to someone promising to destroy it. A powerful formula.
That we're on Day 5 of the astoundingly moronic Dr. Jill Biden debate seems to indicate that Orange Hitler has been defeated, fascism vanquished, the second Civil War finally diffused, and freedom and democracy restored to the American Republic, so that's good news at least
I started to write an article on how Yale's @TimothyDSnyder has been the most consistently and embarrassingly wrong prominent intellectual in the Trump era - endless predictions of coups, tyranny, and civil war -- but his analysis is so superficial and facile I couldn't bother.
Reading Snyder's writings -- sorry, Dr. Snyder's -- is like listening to any random MSNBC panel of Dem strategists talking about Trump, but with a pompous, inch-deep veneer of scholarship. If you want to see why credentials are irrelevant & meritocracy a fraud, start with him.
In May -- after Trump said there'd be a COVID vaccine by year's end -- MSNBC put on its medical expert, @IrwinRedlenerMD, to assure viewers that it was *impossible* -- not unlikely, but "impossible" -- for there to be a safe and effective vaccine ready before 2021.
CNN's @JessicaHuseman (of @propublica) also confidently assured everyone Trump was wrong & there could not be any vaccine by year's end.
Obviously, all they cared about was telling anti-Trump partisans what they wanted to hear, not the truth.
So both MSNBC and CNN analysts spread extreme mistrust about the impossibility of the COVID vaccine that has now arrived -- purely for their own selfish ends. They spent 4 years saying *anything*, without regard if it was true, just to feed anti-Trump fanatics what they wanted.
Mediocre journalists with no reporting accomplishments or record of bravery always hate most those who actually bring transparency to the world's most powerful factions and enable the most important scoops.
They're a mirror held up to these journalists, showing their failures:
If you know deep in your soul that you've never broken any major stories, and never took any risks to challenge powerful factions, and never will, is it really hard to understand why you would hate those -- such as Snowden and Assange -- who have done exactly that?
Also: it's pretty odd to declare everyone now agrees with you about Snowden as @ACLU, @RandPaul, @TulsiGabbard, press freedom & human rights groups all over the world, Lula, Dilma, and @nytimes declare him a heroic whistleblower who deserves a pardon.
2) Deferentially address them only by their proper titles.
3) Know your place.
If you just follow these, a cloud of passive bliss cradles you that will foster personal and societal harmony.
To see the crudeness that results when proper titles of the ruling class are not honored, look at this 2017 WashPost article that viciously mocks PhDs who insist on being addressed as "Doctor." The context was "Dr. Gorka" but it has generalized derision: