Using term "globalist" relative to the Elites is somewhat of a misnomer
Note how they generally do not like long periods of hegemony for 1 country
But rather encourage dual polarity: e.g. US v. USSR and US v. China
Hegemon = potential liability as counter to Oligarchic power
Note how they generally do not like long periods of hegemony for 1 country
But rather encourage dual polarity: e.g. US v. USSR and US v. China
Hegemon = potential liability as counter to Oligarchic power
A "benevolent global hegemony" which was touted in Neocon era is not actually a long term aim
As we are seeing in 2020, the actual plan is the controlled demolition of the US Hegemon
China is of course the next place they'll concentrate efforts but this too is temporary
As we are seeing in 2020, the actual plan is the controlled demolition of the US Hegemon
China is of course the next place they'll concentrate efforts but this too is temporary
This is the reason why places like Singapore, Hong Kong, Israel, Brexit UK are being held in reserve
These are potential Oligarchic safe harbors in the future, in the event that CCP China will be nullified (almost a certainty if it becomes dangerous like the 20C US did)
These are potential Oligarchic safe harbors in the future, in the event that CCP China will be nullified (almost a certainty if it becomes dangerous like the 20C US did)
The fragmentation of the US Empire was long-planned and the first hints of it came directly following the US-Soviet Detente, with the slow dismantling of the SciTech colossus that had been built up for much of the 20C, and segmentation of knowledge also aided Oligarchic goals
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
