$TRIT up big off this analyst note which reads very bullish.
I tend to ignore PT of early stage companies such as Triterras, but there are some other key points here I did like
First, the comps chosen were $TW and $MKTX which trade at roughly ~36x and ~51x 2021 EBITDA
$TRIT trades at 14.1x 2021 EBITDA with much faster growth and worse EBITDA and net margins
Triterras deserves to trade at a much lower multiple until it proves it can scale its ecosystem
The margin profiles of these comps fit $TRIT mgmt. projections pretty well, so while they are on the very high end of the total comp set laid out by mgmt., Oppenheimer choosing them isn't cherrypicking to me.
If Triterras hits their medium-term forecast laid out in their investor presentation from Oct., the multiple rerate would be massive.
Of course this is a big if, but one I am willing to bet on.
Second, Oppenheimer almost certainly met with $TRIT management at the Oppenheimer Fall Blockchain & Digital Assets Summit held on 11/19/20.
It's good to see a strong sell-side note after a management meeting, as it helps alleviate the management concerns I addressed previously.
Finally, I saw Cramer passed on $TRIT on his Lightning Round last night and told his audience to "just buy bitcoin".
I am a fan of Cramer, but Triterras has nothing to do with Bitcoin. Yes, blockchain forms the backbone of Bitcoin, but that's about where the similarities end.
A digital marketplace for trade finance that is built on an ethereum blockchain is completely different from Bitcoin.
I will be adding to $TRIT here (almost at a 3% position now) using proceeds from beginning to sell $WORK.
More information to come with where the rest of my $WORK proceeds go.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$TRIT Alright, so the short report doesn't seem too notable given the Rhodium news (which is notable) broke before it was published. If anyone has read the full report behind the paywall, please correct me if wrong. Given the market reaction since 11AM EST, I'll focus on Rhodium.
On the surface, losing a customer who represents ~10% of revenue is obviously bad, especially when losing them to
On the other hand, reiterating guidance despite losing said customer is pretty impressive.
Furthermore, $TRIT trades at a well below market multiple (~10x 2021 earnings), so unlike $FSLY (similar cust. concentration issue), where any slight change in the growth trajectory violently affects the stock, Triterras doesn't need to smash estimates to stay afloat
Always hard to quantify the value of partnerships, but the $CWH $RIDE agreement seems very bullish for $CWH
$4M cash outlay to prep 170+ service locations to assist EVs (not just electric RVs per Marcus if I heard correctly)
Good Sam Services revenues are ~60% gross margin vs. a weighted average 31% gross margin for the rest of the business
Pursuing partnerships in their higher margin segments is a smart way to expand margins quickly with minimal upfront investment
Yes, electrified motorhomes are a cool concept and a big development, but by preparing their servicing locations to assist EVs of any type, this is likely not the last partnership to provide servicing to an EV manufacturer