Most of the myths and conspiracy theories about a free press in the United States would be demolished by anyone spending any significant amount of time in a press room.
Two reporters whose personal politics might be light years apart from each other can cover the same politically charged event and churn out extremely similar stories.
Because we covered the same happening.
Because we covered the same happening.
Most beat reporters covering social institutions have integrity, and even if they didn't, the professional costs of burying news that damaged their perceived side or rewards to establish a record of credibility and scoops would be enough to set them straight.
I have reported from press rooms from federal, state, and military courts, as well as the U.S. Congress and the United Nations.
This is the rule, and anyone who suggests otherwise is uninformed.
This is the rule, and anyone who suggests otherwise is uninformed.
For those who would ask—"Well, why didn't the press cover X"—in nine cases out of 10, the "X" is fishy garbage that did not pass basic scrutiny or verification.
In which case, a debauched editorial division or fish-rag might pick up.
In which case, a debauched editorial division or fish-rag might pick up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
