Has anybody heard of Brandy Vaughn, a supposed former Merck whistleblower? A vaccine whistleblower who was found dead on 7Dec2020. I discovered her from a post that mentioned that detail, along with a certain ingredient in the SARSCovid2 Vaccine.
How about Dr. Francis Boyle,
human rights lawyer and professor of international law? This dude wrote a BILL during the Bush(1st) years on Bioweapons and Terrorism that became law. Also discovered him through a post that mentioned the very same ingredient in the SARSCovid2 Vaccine. law.illinois.edu/.../faculty-pr…
I'm
going to go down a rabbit hole concerning these two. 1) What do these two have in common? The ingredient is HIV. 2) How credible are they in what they may have brought to light?
I feel Dr Boyle is extremely credible. He isn't some random dude off the streets, he has some
credentials.
I haven't found too much on Ms Vaughn yet, But will continue the search. 3) Will this affect my decision making on a very new concern (probably not)?
No change, I already was NOT going to get the vaccine, but this did cement the decision. 4) Will fellow
lions awaken from the hold/grip of the media mind control efforts (probably not)?
I will post results later.
Other findings: 1) So far 6 people have died during trials. 2) A "false" positive of HIV has been seen in trial participants. 3) Some folks developed Bells Palsy (4 so
far that have been admitted to) 4) Britain has stated that if you have severe allergies, you should NOT get the vaccine. 5) Trials are showing evidence of "Pathogenic Priming" in older adults.
More Questions: 1) What is mRNA and what is the affect? 2) What does the Helsinki Act
have to do with this if anything?
I am not finished researching as of this tweet, just wanted to get what I did find out since the vaccine is being rolled out and folks are foolish enough to be experimented on "voluntarily".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been looking at the new EO from the Kaiserreich Herr Whitmer, and have come up with a few questions. 1) The EO references the Supreme Court ruling from 5Oct2020, "While the court ruled unanimously against Gov. Whitmer’s use of the 1976 act, the court was split with a
majority of 4-3 on the decision regarding the 1945 EPGA." The reference was only for the dissention of the split decision. How can the minority decision, be their legal basis for this new EO? 2) The Public Health Act 368 of 1978 section 333.2226(d) states "Exercise authority and
promulgate rules to safeguard properly the public health; to prevent the spread of diseases and the existence of sources of contamination; and to implement and carry out the powers and duties vested by law in the department." Where and who has defined this exactly? 3) After