Whenever someone proposes a means-testing solution, it's an indication they've internalized the lie, foundational to the United States, that some people deserve life and others don't.
It's an expensive lie.
It seems to me that there's a great fear in this country that a single dollar might go to someone who might not deserve it; or that a single given dollar might be spent on something we deem unworthy.
We'll spend five dollars to prevent the waste of that one dollar.
Our goal should be meeting the basic human needs of all people. Anytime we frame the task around questions of who deserves it, we accept the bad framework of those who don't want to help anyone but themselves.
Draw a clear and simple line—a bold one. Help everybody.
Means testing is like holding swimming lessons tests in the Lido deck pool while the cruise ship is sinking, just to make sure nobody who can swim gets into a life boat.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every once in a while I stop and consider how curing cancer would be absolutely devastating to our current healthcare system, unless the cure could be made prohibitively expensive.
To be clear, it would not be devastating to healthcare workers, but to the system. This injustice, like other injustices, is systemic.
EPISODE I: Will There Be Blood?
EPISODE II: There Will Be Blood
EPISODE III: Here's The Blood
EPISODE IV: Will There Be More Blood?
EPISODE V: There Will Be No More Blood
EPISODE VI: Once There Was Blood
EPISODE VII: Wait We Found More Blood
DANO: AN OIL WARS STORY
EPISODE VIII: The Last Blood
EPISODE IX: Never Mind That Last Blood
What does “unity” mean, if before unity, you are terrorized by racist cops, and after unity, you are still terrorized by racist cops?
If you want unity, work for universal health care, universal education, shelter for all, livable wages for all, and police who are accountable to their communities. End food insecurity. Clean people’s water. Build mass transportation and sustainable energy.