Can we maybe please dial down the rhetoric that, whenever something bad happens because of Brexit, the area or industry in question deserved it because they voted Leave?
Even in the most Leave area in the UK, less than 40% of the total number of local residents voted for Leave.
How so? Because when you add up (Remain + could not vote + did not vote) you get a majority everywhere.
There is nowhere where a majority of people walking around the streets cast their votes for Leave!
It's very easy to sanity check this...
There are about 67 million people living in the UK.
17.4 million voted for Leave (and duly won the referendum).
But that leaves almost 50 million who didn't. They're in the majority EVERYWHERE.
This isn't a thread about the legitimacy of the referendum.
It's a plea not to tar the non-Leave majority that dominates every area with the same brush as the Leavers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You can no longer take meat or milk or products containing them into EU countries from 1 January 2021, so you can forget packing a nice chunk of cheddar (for example).
That's part of the guidance for travellers on the UK Government website. (You'll notice a lot of vague references because, with less than two weeks to go, we still don't know if there's going to be a deal or not.)
There are a lot of Brexit half-truths masquerading as whole-truths.
For example: Only a tiny % of firms trade with the EU. True, but that's because you're using the metric of % not company size. A hairdresser that doesn't trade with the EU, and Nissan that does, both count as 1.
Another example: the vast majority of products won't attract tariffs, even in a no-deal situation. True, but that's again a matter of focusing on the wrong thing. It's not a matter of how many goods get hit by tariffs, but WHICH ones. Food, drink, cars - pretty fundamental stuff.
Yet another example: Many countries trade fine on WTO terms. True, but almost none trade *exclusively* on WTO terms. They have trade agreements too, even if not with the EU. Also, we're not starting from scratch. We had a stonking trade agreement (EU membership) and binned it.
Boris Johnson's REALLY doubling down on the "it's all YOUR fault" message at this afternoon's press conference.
Boris Johnson: "This Christmas, it's vital that everyone exercises the greatest possible personal responsibility."
BJ: "We have decided that the overall situation is alas worse than when we first set the rules."
BJ: It would not be right to criminalise people who've made plans and simply want to spend time with their loved-ones."
BJ: "We're collectively, across the UK, governments at every level, asking YOU to think hard and in detail about the days ahead. We're keeping the laws the same, but we all want to send the same message: a smaller Christmas is going to be a safer Christmas."
"From the 1 January 2021, EUTMs will no longer protect trade marks in the UK. Under the Withdrawal Agreement Act, on the 1 January 2021, the IPO will create a comparable UK trade mark for all right holders with an existing EU trade mark."
The UK will essentially copy across all existing EU trademarks so that they also become "comparable UK trademarks". This cut-and-paste job will be free for trademark holders.
HOWEVER, they will then have to pay to renew their UK trademarks separately in the future.
That's right: firms will have to pay twice: once for their EU trademark, once for their UK trademark.
They'll also have twice as many opportunities to be challenged in court over trademark usage.
Robert Jenrick (to interviewer): "The difference between us is, you want the Government to tell everybody what they should be doing at Christmas. My view is that the Government can set a legal framework, and then it's for people to use their good judgment."
Making it OUR fault.
The whole point of the UK Government legislating restrictions is that it forces the people least able (or willing) to use good judgement to modify their behaviour.
In a pandemic where everyone is a danger to everyone else, it protects the sensible from the stupid.
If the doorknob-licking covidiots were only a danger to themselves, the rest of the population could let them get on with it (and covidiocy would die out quicker).
But because their actions affect us all, strong Government legislation (not guidance) is needed.
Because he's announced it today but it's only coming into effect on Wednesday, you can expect the usual wild excesses tonight and tomorrow from the subset of people who always seem to treat this sort of thing as the last day before the asteroid hits.
Oddity: London is so dangerous now that it requires Tier 3 restrictions, but from 23-27 December it will be perfectly fine for Londoners to spread their wings all over the UK (and for people to flock to London to visit people there).