Because he's announced it today but it's only coming into effect on Wednesday, you can expect the usual wild excesses tonight and tomorrow from the subset of people who always seem to treat this sort of thing as the last day before the asteroid hits.
Oddity: London is so dangerous now that it requires Tier 3 restrictions, but from 23-27 December it will be perfectly fine for Londoners to spread their wings all over the UK (and for people to flock to London to visit people there).
And then the virus comes off its Xmas break.
If you rewind to September, when the scientists (and Labour) were calling for decisive action... Had such action been taken then, rather than almost a month later, none of this would have been necessary.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Robert Jenrick (to interviewer): "The difference between us is, you want the Government to tell everybody what they should be doing at Christmas. My view is that the Government can set a legal framework, and then it's for people to use their good judgment."
Making it OUR fault.
The whole point of the UK Government legislating restrictions is that it forces the people least able (or willing) to use good judgement to modify their behaviour.
In a pandemic where everyone is a danger to everyone else, it protects the sensible from the stupid.
If the doorknob-licking covidiots were only a danger to themselves, the rest of the population could let them get on with it (and covidiocy would die out quicker).
But because their actions affect us all, strong Government legislation (not guidance) is needed.
The Express currently has *23* Brexit stories on the front page of its online edition.
Every one of them is a lie, distortion or fabrication.
It is not really *that* surprising that their readers have misunderstood the whole Brexit thing...
Since the referendum (and in the run-up to it too) anyone relying on the Express for "news" will have been exposed to thousands, maybe tens of thousands of stories about Brexit.
These paint a *consistently misleading* picture, ie they're wrong, but build on each other.
How can one expect people to be informed when faced with such a barrage of brainwashing?
But there is one thing the Express might be able to twist, but it won't be able to hide: shortages in the shops.
It will take the EU a surprisingly short time to recover from Brexit.
1) They have already (in effect) replaced our trade since the referendum. 2) Their borders are ready. 3) Each of our 27 competitors has the might of the EU behind them. 4) More jobs and capital will flee.
5) They will have significantly more bandwidth to devote to other issues (eg trade deals: 100% of their negotiators will be able to get back to their primary role of signing up new partners) 6) We have sabotaged our competitiveness further by axing VAT-free shopping for tourists
7) Hauliers who aren't already avoiding the UK will see the chaos at the ports, and give us a wide berth 8) The rapid switch to electric cars forces all auto manufacturers to completely rejig their plants *anyway* so more will take the opportunity to leave
THREAD: Here are the essential points from the EU's time-limited, limited effect no-deal Brexit mitigation offer.
(Most concessions are unilateral measures it will implement. Some require UK cooperation - not clear what happens if we refuse to do so!) ec.europa.eu/info/sites/inf…
Air travel
"Unless there is a contingency measure in place on air transport at the end of the transition period, air traffic between the EU and the United Kingdom will be interrupted."
The EU is proposing 6 months of reciprocal concessions to keep (most) planes flying.
However, they're not offering any concessions on airline ownership requirements, so BA for one may come unstuck here (depending on how its restructured shareholding is going). Its message: you already had plenty of time to prepare, including a grace period.