Many people have asked why it matters that she removed a clause requiring the Cherokee Nation to treat the Freedmen equally in receiving housing funding? I’ll tell you why. Cherokee Freedmen are not eligible for CBIDs, although I think they should be (Freedmen “Blood” should
be counted as Indian Blood). Anyone who has a CBID knows that for most services (especially outside of your tribal boundaries), you need a CBID. You need to present a CBID for healthcare, now Haskell is trying to deny Freedmen based on the fact that they do not have CBIDs.
There are many other services based on CBIDs as well. The Cherokee Nation, under the leadership of @ChuckHoskin_Jr, is urging other tribes and other facilities to treat Freedmen equally and has sent the same directive to their programs. This is great. However, this could change
at any moment. If a new Chief were to be elected or (God forbid) if Chief Hoskin were to change his declaration, Cherokee Freedmen could go back to second-class citizenship, like the Seminole Freedmen. Being citizens and being counted when applying for funding, but then being
denied services. Because it’s been determined that we can’t have CBIDs, we need our tribes to stand for us. The Seminole Nation has denied Freedmen services and told other tribes to deny them services as well. Citizenship doesn’t guarantee equal treatment. That’s why Freedmen
support keeping the clause in for Cherokee Freedmen in NAHASDA and its why we support Maxine Water’s clause pertaining to Freedmen of all Five Tribes. Our tribes should not be able to deny us services based on race and continue to receive our tax-payer funds for their
discriminatory programs. There’s really a quick fix for the tribes, if they want to accept money for their co-signer of the Treaties of 1866. TREAT YOUR FREEDMEN EQUALLY.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen

Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChoctawFreedmen

19 Dec
Oklahoma is the perfect example of race being a myth crafted to shift control of land and wealth into white communities. Because each individual Native person in the Five Tribes received a land allotment (including women), white lawmakers made all non-Black people legally white.
This allowed for white men to marry non-Black Native women and shift control of Native lands into white communities and hands. Even though most white men couldn’t get a Native land allotment themself, by re-classifying non-Black Natives as white and setting up Jim Crow marriage
laws on racial lines, they were able to control Native women’s lands thru marriage and accumulate wealth. These Jim Crow Laws were the first laws every established after Oklahoma became a state and came into effect on December 18, 1907.
Read 16 tweets
19 Dec
Y’all, trust me I don’t want to be tweeting about Deb Haaland. I find my ancestors’ histories and cultures to be far more interesting than advocating for policies with someone who doesn’t even think I’m valid. But I’m not doing this for me, I’m doing it for my ancestors and for
my family who find tribal citizenship to be very important to them. I’m gonna be honest, I wouldn’t even qualify for any tribal benefits. The main programs I want are language programs that are free to citizens. This isn’t about benefits but honoring what my ancestors fought for.
They could’ve left Indian Territory if they wanted to and could’ve been US citizens with some rights. But they didn’t. They stayed in their nations and fought for us to be equal today. I’m fighting for their memory.
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec
Deb Haaland is not a member of one of the Five Slaveholding Tribes. However, she has now chosen to accept a position as an agent of the federal government to oversee tribal affairs. In her position, supporting Black Freedmen of the Five Slaveholding Tribes is a good first step.
If she didn’t want to become an agent of the federal government and now become a party to the Treaties of 1866, she shouldn’t have accepted Biden’s offer to become the Sec. of the Interior. She is now the agent who is supposed to make sure the US govt upholds their end of tribal
treaties and make sure tribal governments uphold their end of treaties with the US govt. that’s literally part of her job description. So either way, she will have to take a stand on Freedmen. Whether she chooses to aid the tribes in our discrimination, or chooses a benign
Read 4 tweets
17 Dec
Representative Deb Haaland has been chosen as Biden’s Sec. of the Interior. Haaland has refused to make support the Freedmen of the Five Slaveholding Tribes and had co-sponsored legislation that would allow our tribes to continue receiving funding despite their Jim Crow policies.
To the “progressive” organizations who continued to support Deb Haaland despite knowing this information, I hope you will stand with us now. Black Natives deserve to be treated equally. @ndncollective @sunrisemvmt @justicedems @MarkRuffalo
I am currently feeling mixed about this news. I hope she will now support us. We can’t allow this Jim Crow discrimination to continue for another four years. I am feeling very much stabbed in the back by Native and progressive orgs and people who have never spoken up for us.
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec
During the Civil War, the Five Slaveholding Tribes aligned themselves with the Confederate States of America. In their treaties with the Confederacy, slavery was upheld and in the case of the Seminole Nation, the Confederacy promised reparations payments to slaveholders whose Image
slaves had been freed during the Second Seminole Wars. Many slaves owned by Seminoles were freed by Jesups Proclamation (the precursor to and the blueprint for the Emancipation Proclamation), so the Confederacy promised reparations payments for those freed slaves.
Pictured are Cherokee Confederate veterans in 1903.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec
Black and Native solidarity will be so difficult and so complex because although both groups have committed harm against one another, Native tribes committed harms (like slavery, discrimination, and violence) as sovereign nations, whereas Black Americans committed harms without
political independence or sovereignty. The Buffalo Soldiers, for example, were soldiers associated with the US army. They were acting as agents of the US govt and not their own political wills. There’s a stark difference in what accountability should and could look like.
Native tribes are often infantilized across the board, and are treated as “sovereign” in name, while either federal and state governments ignore their treaties and rights or Native activists excuse their historical and present harms.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!