Oklahoma is the perfect example of race being a myth crafted to shift control of land and wealth into white communities. Because each individual Native person in the Five Tribes received a land allotment (including women), white lawmakers made all non-Black people legally white.
This allowed for white men to marry non-Black Native women and shift control of Native lands into white communities and hands. Even though most white men couldn’t get a Native land allotment themself, by re-classifying non-Black Natives as white and setting up Jim Crow marriage
laws on racial lines, they were able to control Native women’s lands thru marriage and accumulate wealth. These Jim Crow Laws were the first laws every established after Oklahoma became a state and came into effect on December 18, 1907.
However, white men had a problem. Although they were able to marry non-Black Native women, their Jim Crow laws that they created prevented them from marrying wealthy Afro-Native women and girls, blocking a pathway to wealth and land acquisition.
There were Freedmen girls and women who ended up—by luck—receiving prosperous land allotments that produced the most wealth that Black folks had ever had. So, you have a state where there are now Black Natives who are wealthier than the white men trying to create gender and race
hierarchies and because of the Jim Crow laws they implemented themselves, they can’t access these girls’ wealth through marriages. One huge example of this was Creek Freedgirl Sarah Rector. At only 11 years old, she became the richest Black person in the whole country due to the
oil extracted on her land allotment. White men were furious and as she got access to her money, she started to cross the social boundaries of race because of her wealth. She received dozens of proposals for illegal marriages to white men both around the US and internationally.
But again, the white legislature made these marriages illegal. So, instead of ending Jim Crow, the legislature attempted to legally reclassify Sarah as white. This would allow not only white men to marry her but would also not cause her to break the class-based assumptions about
race. If the law passed, she would no longer be a wealthy Black woman breaking the class-based boundaries of race, but she would now be a “dark skinned” white woman, more aligned with what the class bounds of whiteness were supposed to be.
Freedmen were also consistently kidnapped by white and Black people who forced them to sign their lands away. White men also paid Black men to marry Freedwoman and Freedgirls and force them to sign away their lands once married. They found ways within the boundaries of Jim Crow
to violently redistribute land and wealth, and this reinforce the class bounds of whiteness. #FreedmenHistorySpotlightSaturday
I wrote about this in my senior thesis at Columbia. history.columbia.edu/wp-content/upl…
Please read Racecraft: The Soul of Ineqaulity in American Life by Professor Barbara Fields for more info on how race is constructed, her theory was the basis of my articulations of how race is shaped by the needs of land and labor.
Please sign our petition to Deb Haaland! We are currently treated as second-class citizens in our tribes to this day!
Some other accounts to follow on Freedmen and also on Tulsa Race Massacre: @MCIFB1866Treaty and @Just4Greenwood
Just wanted to add that this is all from original research and that in order to refer to it in writing, please cite the research.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen

Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChoctawFreedmen

19 Dec
Many people have asked why it matters that she removed a clause requiring the Cherokee Nation to treat the Freedmen equally in receiving housing funding? I’ll tell you why. Cherokee Freedmen are not eligible for CBIDs, although I think they should be (Freedmen “Blood” should
be counted as Indian Blood). Anyone who has a CBID knows that for most services (especially outside of your tribal boundaries), you need a CBID. You need to present a CBID for healthcare, now Haskell is trying to deny Freedmen based on the fact that they do not have CBIDs.
There are many other services based on CBIDs as well. The Cherokee Nation, under the leadership of @ChuckHoskin_Jr, is urging other tribes and other facilities to treat Freedmen equally and has sent the same directive to their programs. This is great. However, this could change
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec
Y’all, trust me I don’t want to be tweeting about Deb Haaland. I find my ancestors’ histories and cultures to be far more interesting than advocating for policies with someone who doesn’t even think I’m valid. But I’m not doing this for me, I’m doing it for my ancestors and for
my family who find tribal citizenship to be very important to them. I’m gonna be honest, I wouldn’t even qualify for any tribal benefits. The main programs I want are language programs that are free to citizens. This isn’t about benefits but honoring what my ancestors fought for.
They could’ve left Indian Territory if they wanted to and could’ve been US citizens with some rights. But they didn’t. They stayed in their nations and fought for us to be equal today. I’m fighting for their memory.
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec
Deb Haaland is not a member of one of the Five Slaveholding Tribes. However, she has now chosen to accept a position as an agent of the federal government to oversee tribal affairs. In her position, supporting Black Freedmen of the Five Slaveholding Tribes is a good first step.
If she didn’t want to become an agent of the federal government and now become a party to the Treaties of 1866, she shouldn’t have accepted Biden’s offer to become the Sec. of the Interior. She is now the agent who is supposed to make sure the US govt upholds their end of tribal
treaties and make sure tribal governments uphold their end of treaties with the US govt. that’s literally part of her job description. So either way, she will have to take a stand on Freedmen. Whether she chooses to aid the tribes in our discrimination, or chooses a benign
Read 4 tweets
17 Dec
Representative Deb Haaland has been chosen as Biden’s Sec. of the Interior. Haaland has refused to make support the Freedmen of the Five Slaveholding Tribes and had co-sponsored legislation that would allow our tribes to continue receiving funding despite their Jim Crow policies.
To the “progressive” organizations who continued to support Deb Haaland despite knowing this information, I hope you will stand with us now. Black Natives deserve to be treated equally. @ndncollective @sunrisemvmt @justicedems @MarkRuffalo
I am currently feeling mixed about this news. I hope she will now support us. We can’t allow this Jim Crow discrimination to continue for another four years. I am feeling very much stabbed in the back by Native and progressive orgs and people who have never spoken up for us.
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec
During the Civil War, the Five Slaveholding Tribes aligned themselves with the Confederate States of America. In their treaties with the Confederacy, slavery was upheld and in the case of the Seminole Nation, the Confederacy promised reparations payments to slaveholders whose Image
slaves had been freed during the Second Seminole Wars. Many slaves owned by Seminoles were freed by Jesups Proclamation (the precursor to and the blueprint for the Emancipation Proclamation), so the Confederacy promised reparations payments for those freed slaves.
Pictured are Cherokee Confederate veterans in 1903.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec
Black and Native solidarity will be so difficult and so complex because although both groups have committed harm against one another, Native tribes committed harms (like slavery, discrimination, and violence) as sovereign nations, whereas Black Americans committed harms without
political independence or sovereignty. The Buffalo Soldiers, for example, were soldiers associated with the US army. They were acting as agents of the US govt and not their own political wills. There’s a stark difference in what accountability should and could look like.
Native tribes are often infantilized across the board, and are treated as “sovereign” in name, while either federal and state governments ignore their treaties and rights or Native activists excuse their historical and present harms.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!