Thread. Saw a video re an officer-involved-shooting. Commenter(s) asked: “why didn’t the officer shoot him the leg?” This is why: shooting a firearm well is a lot like swinging a golf club. It involves a lot of fine motor movements, except, unlike hitting a golf ball there is an
explosion in front of one’s face. It’s unnatural. Those things make shooting difficult even when she’s just on the range. Squeeze the grip just a little too hard and the shot goes down and to the left. Flinch in anticipation of the shot/bang and the shot goes wide.
Now, when an officer arrives at a scene she often has a sketchy report (e.g.,man with a knife). She sees the threat, which is not usually stationary, as she pulls to a stop. She’s moving as she gets out of the car (she has to get out of her seatbelt just like you but
she has to do it with 30lbs of gear around her waist). As she gets out she sees the threat advancing toward her. A man w/a knife can close a gap of 21 feet in 1.5 sec. In this case she was on the radio and giving verbal commands: “drop the knife!” He didn’t he kept coming.
Let’s go back to the golf analogy. She has to draw, get on target, get off the radio, notice her surroundings (any other threats), observe what’s behind the threat (might she hit anyone else?), grip the weapon, and try to stop the threat to her self & to the public.
All this happens in about 2-3 seconds or less. Imagine trying to hit a moving golf ball. Now make it an exploding golf ball. Now imagine that you’re trying to hit a moving, exploding golf ball, while an insane/drugged person is trying to stab you with a knife & all in 2-3 sec.
Add to this adrenaline, which diminishes accuracy by 50%.This is why cops are taught to shoot center mass. It’s not “shoot to kill.” It’s shoot to stop. Two shots, center mass are most likely to stop an immediate threat to the officer and to the public. Reality isn’t like TV.
It’s not easy to hit an arm or a leg generally & even more difficult to do in a fight. Let’s say an officer under attack, with 2-3 seconds max aims at an arm or a leg and misses? Where does that round go? It might go for hundreds of yards. What or whom might it hit or kill?
Further, hitting an extremity might not stop the threat.

Reality is not like TV.
Crazed/drugged attackers can be hit even center mass repeatedly and continue to attack. Adrenaline is powerful (and so are narcotics). Larger attackers may not go down after being hit 5-6x. Cops are trained to keep firing until the threat is stopped.
Under attack, very few cops are able to do all that I’ve described AND count rounds. Afterwards they often have no idea how many rounds they fired. Under attack their focus narrows on the threat. Surrounding noise & activity gets blocked out. It’s nature.
Everything you think you know from movies/TV about cops & shooting is prob false. TV’s job is to entertain not to accurately portray the reality of a violent encounter with a deadly threat.
Cops are not super heroes. They are ordinary men & women who do an extraordinarily difficult job, which is becoming increasingly difficult by the day. In many departments they are under-trained, under-funded, and under-staffed but they leave their families every day,
and wade into the worst day of some citizen’s life to keep him and the rest of us safe.
They’re out during Covid. They’re out during the holidays. They’re out over night and they’re out all day long. They want to go home to their families but when they do, and as they try to sleep, their brain replays sometimes
terrible things, including, God forbid, the use of lethal force. They train for it but they hope never to have to use it and they never entirely recover from it. Again, assume that *everything* you seen on TV/movies is nonsense. Don’t use it to judge real life.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with R. Scott Clark

R. Scott Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RScottClark

25 Oct
It simply doesn’t follow and there is no evidence that the apostles or early post-apostolic church intended to say Ekklesia, in Christsn use, meant what it meant in secular usage.
Ekklesia is used in the LXX (The Greek translation of the Old Testament) in place of the Hebrew word for “covenant assembly.“ This is how it is used in the New Testament.
Read 9 tweets
16 Sep
It would help the evangelical discussion re church/state (e.g., masks, distancing, meeting indoors etc) to distinguish between the state's interest in regulating things *around* worship, that are common to all gatherings, and regulating the material of worship.
We all recognize (or we did before Covid) that the community, as represented by civil gov't, has a proper interest in the general welfare of the community. Thus, I'm unaware of any church that has refused to allow the fire dept or the health dept to do inspections.
How many churches now certify that their youth/nursery workers are not sexual offenders? How many have made training in re ipsa mandatory? Our church buildings must be built to local safety/fire codes. No one reasonably objects to such civil regulation.
Read 31 tweets
25 May
The distinction between *for* and *from* is the distinction between law & gospel, between the covenants of works & grace. Learn it well.
There are a number of teachers/preachers within NAPARC & without who teach that we do good works *for* salvation. Some say that good works are the instrument of “final salvation.”
Any such teaching would turn the covenant of grace into a covenant of works, were it possible. They want to steal your joy & freedom in Christ & replace it with guilt & servile fear in order to drive you to more good works.
Read 17 tweets
8 May
The people who tell you "Reformed Is Not Enough" almost never know what they're talking about. First try actually being Reformed for a week before you start telling people to move on.
People who tell you that "Reformed Is Not Enough" and who corrupt the holy gospel are not qualified to criticize the Reformed faith. They don't even get the gospel right.
How hard is to to get the gospel right? It's not that complex: salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. The ground of justification is the imputed righteousness of Christ, received through faith alone.
Read 12 tweets
21 Apr
Thread.

To whom it may concern, Geerhardus Vos was not a Baptist. He did not read the history of redemption the way Baptists do. He saw ONE covenant of grace running throughout redemptive history, with various administrations.
Recognizing progress in the revelation and realizing of redemption does not make one a proto-Baptist. The Reformed have ALWAYS done this. For Vos, as a Reformed theologian, the covenants in the OT were the covenant of grace.
They did not merely anticipate the covenant of grace or somehow participate by anticipation (prolepsis) the covenant of grace. They WERE the covenant of grace or administrations of the covenant of grace.
Read 6 tweets
2 Mar
@joythruChrist @PrometheusX303 Jen,

@JulesDiner is correct. The expression “Reformed Baptist” is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. One is either Reformed or Baptist. One cannot be both. This is not uncharitable. This is the truth.

1/x
@joythruChrist @PrometheusX303 @JulesDiner The expression “Reformed Baptist” has only become widely used very recently. The earliest usage I’ve seen dates to 1823, almost 3 centuries after the meaning of “Reformed” was established. That 19th-cent usage is ambiguous. 2/x
@joythruChrist @PrometheusX303 @JulesDiner Think of it this way. Your family has lived in a house called “Reformed House” since the 1540s and suddenly other folks begin moving in and moving the furniture around and telling you to be quiet and stop complaining about the new arrangements. How would you like it? 3/x
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!