#3 Public health is about everyone. It should not be used to shift the burden of disease from the affluent to the less affluent, as the #COVID19#lockdowns have done. torontosun.com/opinion/column…
#5 Risks and harms cannot be completely eliminated, but they can be reduced. Elimination and zero-COVID strategies backfire, making things worse. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…@JuliaLMarcus
#6 Public health should focus on high-risk populations. For #COVID19, many standard public health measures were never used to protect high-risk older people, leading to unnecessary deaths. newsweek.com/we-should-focu…
#7 While contact tracing and isolation is critically important for some infectious diseases, it is futile and counterproductive for common infections such as influenza and #COVID19. inference-review.com/article/on-the…@MikkoPackalen
#8 A case is only a case if a person is sick. Mass testing asymptomatic individuals is harmful to public health. web.archive.org/web/2020111407…
#9 Public health is about trust. To gain the trust of the public, public health officials and the media must be honest and trust the public. Shaming and fear should never be used in a pandemic. thehill.com/opinion/health… @camakridis
#10 Public health scientists and officials must be honest with what is not known. For example, epidemic models should be run with the whole range of plausible input parameters. statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-f…
#11 In public health, open civilized debate is profoundly critical. Censoring, silencing and smearing leads to fear of speaking, herd thinking and distrust. scientificamerican.com/article/the-co… @JeanneLenzer1
#12 It is important for public health scientists and officials to listen to the public, who are living the public health consequences. This pandemic has proved that many non-epidemiologists understand public health better than some epidemiologists. / END
Pandemic absurdities: Firing people with natural immunity after Covid recovery, even though they are the least likely to spread Covid to others. 🧵 1/∞ brownstone.org/articles/hospi…
Pandemic absurdities: How some scientists, like NIH director Collins and Fauci, thought that you promote science by silencing scientists through “published takedowns”. 🧵2/∞ brownstone.org/articles/the-c…
Pandemic absurdities: School closures. Putting the hardest and most damaging restrictions on those with the lowest risk and miniscule Covid mortality. 🧵3/∞ brownstone.org/articles/hurti…
The coordinated media campaign against the Great Barrington Declaration claimed that it lacked specific proposals for protecting the old. Please read excerpts below and judge. More people would be alive today if more of these had been implemented. 1/9 gbdeclaration.org
"Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors .. " - @gbdeclaration 2/9
" .. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside .." -@gbdeclaration 3/9
Unfortunately, @JeremyFarrar won the UK pandemic policy fight. Now he is trying to evade responsibility for the biggest public health mistake in history, with too many COVID deaths among the old and workers, and enormous collateral public health damage on children and adults. 2/5
Moreover, @JeremyFarrar is making false accusations against @SunetraGupta. Either he is deliberately distorting her science, or, he never bothered to read her papers and the @gbdeclaration, instead basing his slander on the inaccurate writings in e.g. the @guardian. 3/5
@drjenndowd@VPrasadMDMPH@melindacmills@BillHanage Vaccines are great for focused protection if we prioritize older high-risk people and their care takers, like Florida. To minimize deaths, we must also urgently improve protection of the old through standard public health measures listed in the @gbdeclaration & FAQ. 2/8
@drjenndowd@VPrasadMDMPH@melindacmills@BillHanage@gbdeclaration Nursing home residents have highest risk, but <1% of US population. People >60 who should work from home or take short sabbaticals are fewer than those currently working from home. There are many retirees, but protecting them with e.g. grocery deliveries is relatively easy. 3/8