These are just some examples - there are others. The government is clearly under significant political pressure. But the fact that MPs cannot #recallparliament without ministerial approval is fundamentally problematic.
Here @William_Wragg, Conservative chair of @CommonsPACAC (Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Committee), in joining the demands for recall, usefully reproduces the Commons standing order.
This is a very serious allegation. Surely no Prime Minister would actively plan for parliament to be closed in order to avoid scrutiny of a difficult political decision? 🙄
Statement from Unit Director Professor Meg Russell on the 16 new appointments to the House of Lords announced today.
"It is hard not to see the Prime Minister’s latest round of peerage appointments as anything less than outrageous"
1 of 3
It's 3 days before (what's left of) Christmas, so there will be no full analysis now.
But to see the effects of today's peerage announcements just add 16 (7 Con, 5 Lab, 4 Crossbench) to the details below. The rest of the analysis still stands.
Following 14 months of research, deliberation, interviews and consultation, the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland launches its interim report.
To launch the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland’s interim report the Group is convening a series of webinars.
The webinars are an opportunity for discussion of the report’s purposes, analysis, and conclusions
Details👇
2/
The Unit is hosting one of the webinars
3 December @ 1pm
Chair of the group @alanjrenwick will be joined on the panel with Working Group member Alan Whysall, former senior civil servant Clare Salters & @martinkettle
This looks bad. Government using its control of the Commons agenda to manipulate debate on whether MPs can participate virtually in proceedings during the pandemic.
Which is surely, if anything is, a matter that MPs themselves should be able properly and fairly to decide.
Oddly, this fails to mention Conservative @CommonsProcCom chair Karen Bradley, & the Conservative co-sponsor of @RhonddaBryant's amendment, & that they all supported that amendment in order to open up virtual participation to a larger number of excluded MPs but JRM blocked it.
Unit Director Meg Russell is joined on the panel by @Tanni_GT and @LordNortonLouth for what looks like will be a fascinating discussion on the House of Lords and reform @MileEndInst
Meg explains that debates on Lords reform have long been a feature of British politics. Going back as far as 1911 there have been incremental reforms to the chamber.
One of the more recent changes occurred in 2014 which allowed peers to retire.
Meg reminds us that debates concerning reform of the function and role of the second chamber is not unique to the UK.
Neither is the view that the second chamber is undemocratic, nor the failure to agree on reform.
The Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland launches its interim report on 26 Nov.
This will contain a wealth of considered analysis.
But first, here’s what you need to know about the report and the Group 👇
2/
What’s the report about?
It explores how any future referendum on Northern Ireland’s constitutional status would best be designed and conducted. The Group is neutral on whether a unification referendum should be held & on what the outcome should be vimeo.com/444466668
3/
What is the Working Group?
The Group comprises researchers at universities in Belfast, Dublin, London, & USA, chaired by Unit Deputy Director @alanjrenwick. It is independent of both governments and all political parties. vimeo.com/439174225