Mangy Jay Profile picture
20 Dec, 4 tweets, 1 min read
I think a few things are true:

1. It's absolutely rage-inducing to see privileged GOP members of congress get the vaccine when they've downplayed the crisis + refused aid
2. continuity of gov makes sense*
3. politicians should get the vaccine to instill public trust
in terms of 2: continuity of government: of course Pelosi, the current occupant of the WH, Pence, Biden, & Harris should be prioritized. Why Lindsey Graham has a part in this group is understandably questionable, but it also makes logistical sense to just vaccinate them all
So, personally, I think broad government vaccination makes sense + I think it has some societal benefits beyond government continuity (addressing vaccine skepticism). At the same time, people have the right to be angry when they see COVID denialists getting vaccine-priority.
Vaccinating the government makes sense. But absolute rage in response to how the GOP has managed this crisis, coupled w/ them getting priority makes sense too. If their actions hadn't led to mass death, I think we would generally be comfortable w/ their prioritized vaccinations.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

21 Dec
These data are interesting and should be studied by Dems, w/ Latino politicians, academics, etc. taking the lead. I am not going to opine on why I think these shifts occurred, given I do not belong to one of the aforementioned groups. I will make a few other comments ImageImageImage
1st, the visualizations are of shifts. Biden still won many of the areas in the article by a lot. The shift scale is from 10-30%. The shifts indicate changes in proportion from '16-'20. There's no way to tell if we're talking about primarily new voters, swing voters, or a mix ImageImage
So, a few comments: after the election, based on the data I saw at the time, I said it was possible that the new Democratic weakness w/ Latinos was perhaps overstated by the media & very regionally specific (mostly S. FL). I think that was clearly incorrect.
Read 13 tweets
21 Dec
I would say this website turns self-righteous hindsight bias into an art (& I would be correct) but at this point I don't even think a lot of folks who are aggressively engaging in such bias are applying it to memories that are factually correct.
I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but my personal recall of October is not that McConnell passed a bill that Pelosi turned down. I also recall that the 1.8 T deal was discussed between Mnuchin & Pelosi. & Trump lost interest at one point--entirely calling off stimulus talks altogether.
There are a lot of moving pieces here. The 1.8 T bill had a liability shield that Democrats found too much of a poison pill. There was also, of course, hope we would win the Senate and could get a better bill.
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
Okay, so I was prepared for all kinds of debates (some interesting; some not) about overall allocation rankings, but I was not prepared for controversy over the first in line: medical workers. I can't believe some aren't aware of the multiple logical arguments to support this.
I mean, there are a lot of reasons to vaccinate medical workers first, but a primary one is that we don't have enough doctors/nurses in the workforce to combat COVID even if they are all well. Hospital capacity ain't just about beds and ventilators.
remember April? When many states were spared, but the NE, esp. NYC, were just pummeled? remember how doctors and nurses bravely volunteered to travel to NY to help? How inspiring it was?

Well, that can't happen now b/c almost every state is experiencing capacity issues.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec
About House Leadership:

I don't think all progressives completely realize this, but they're unlikely to get someone better for their interests than Pelosi as Speaker. She is both personally quite progressive compared to the caucus as a whole, as well as politically effective.
I have no idea what the problem with Clyburn is other than that he's older. Is he bad at whipping votes? Does he shut down prog ideas? I haven't seen any of this. In the absence of actual criticism, I find something distasteful about arguing a Civil rights leader should step down
I have less strong feelings about Hoyer. I think he can be off in messaging (not aggressive enough). The Dem House caucus was held together quite effectively during the past 2 yrs, but how much this is attributable to Hoyer, I don't know.
Read 6 tweets
16 Dec
Again, journalists could serve the public better in the next four years if they learned a bit more about about stuttering. Otherwise, we're in for a long haul of hyper-focus on minor errors that both drags down political discourse + further stigmatizes stuttering.
I know it's not *entirely* easy, but it does present a good challenge for journalists: how do you report on a politician who has atypical speech/language? We're used to hearing about errors from politicians, so how should this be different?
I think one simple rule might be to learn about stuttering patterns, which include word/name substitutions. Do you need to exhaustively report on each one of these instances? I don't think that you do.
Read 6 tweets
16 Dec
"The day after the ex-cop allegedly held the terrified repairman at gunpoint, convinced of a massive election conspiracy that did not exist, he received a wire transfer for $211,400. . .The money came from a conservative group that’s pumped up election fraud conspiracy theories"
One thing I keep thinking about is how a range of people, from conservatives to general twitter contrarians, mocked liberals for having fears re: political violence. A lot of this violence is actually occurring, but we're just not loudly talking about it & connecting all the dots
Just to cite a few examples: a plot to kidnap & execute a governor, threats of physical violence against Biden, Harris, MI health officials, MI legislators, GA election officials & their spouses (incl. sexual threats in some cases, as well as 1 lynching threat in MI). . . .
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!