Thread by @EOwhit

Some things don't change. Take a look at the time inbetween those things (tweets). This is a little different. Now we do time's inbetween tweets, ocassionally I do them inbetween drops. What about the tweet to it's direct drop ref? I'll illustrate.

This tweet from today at 10:30, subtracted from this one, at 6:51 this morning.
Ok the diffs look like this. We have some pretty short numbers, that gives us an option to throw a zero at the end of most. 3Hours 39minutes, so 339 and 3390.

Im just gonna run down the line. Make use of the drops as you see fit. Use your own logic.
From the time difference 3hours39minutes
339, 3390

3Hours39minutes is also 219 minutes.
So drop 219 and 2190
The pic on the second drop 2190, looks like the warp in STARWARS doesn't it?

219 minutes, is aso 1,314 seconds, not zero to add, but we can check out the mirror. Looks like it may be a piece of 219, odd as that sounds. Mirror=4131
so much TRUTH in this (sorta like FLYNN 3390)
I'ld show you the link but it's from a suspended account. Curious, no?

Well if all those matter, what about this 3.65 hours?
See that nice "Special place"? Also curious no. One "coincidence" is cool, multiple isn't really a coincidence is it?

3650 should be included just to keep the same method.
Panic in DC? It's a big twit list to look at, it's weird how the numbers are seperated. Reminds me of drops, though maybe I have tunnel vision.

I'll leave this as a bonus, 563 because the 365.
Stay together, hive mind. (Oh, and the STAR WARS is strong with this one)

Any errors, in transposition or math, just let me know via DM/tweet/both.
(I think there's more too it as well, look at the "op" syntax)
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.

Heh, just realized I didn't do times, between drops like I inteneded. Too wrapped up with the current path. Still interesting non the less.