We believe there is no difference between the fight for Dharma of Lord Shri Rama Deity and Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity and It is our duty to fulfill the pious purpose for which our Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity approached SC Nine Judge Bench but was not heard
Our Judiciary has to introspect on the fact that frm Feb 10th after rejection of Deity petition there has been only a single sitting of less than an hour by the Supreme Court Nine Judge Bench till date" AP Founder Association on rejection of Deity petition
We are thankful that there are many dharmik organizations which share our view that the pious purpose of Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity movement to protect Art 26 Deity rights of all Hindu Deities is also very important and should be supported 🙏 pgurus.com/the-dharmik-fi…
For those who say that we need more popular support for Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification our humble submission is how come it was possible for Prince of Arcot to secure a clarification while Hindu Deities have to secure popular support for a dharmik demand?
Following Dharma secures protection of Dharma which is needed for the welfare of the Nation and it should not depend on how many people ask for it is hopefully the important lesson that our Nation can learn for the future from Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We The People of this great Nation Bharath have given constitutional power to SC to protect Dharma(यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem) at same time whenever SC does not do this we have retained constitutional right to rectify thru His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
The Constitutional Morality (Dharma) spirit embedded in Art 363 is that SC in its adjudicating role cannot interpret our constitution in a way which would negate our pledged word to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity very embodiment of Dharma which we value more than life
As a Nation which from very ancient times believes in the spirit of Dharma that one should value pledged word more than life we request His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn decide Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) dispute applying the same spirit & guide Council of Ministers
Law of Dharma that governs the Creation
धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः (If we Protect Dharma it protects else it destroys)
"The President has not only to act impartially but he has to act nobly. He represents the nation's dharma. He is the keeper of the country's conscience..
We are faced with the stark alternative of either dharma in public life or the twilight of Indian democracy" Nani Palkhivala
OM Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn as representative of Nation's Dharma has a great moral responsibility to ensure as a Nation we follow Dharma in the matter of Art 363 Hindu Deity rights dispute and secure protection of Dharma
Tomorrow Dec 8th
On Dec 8th 2001
"Chilkur Balaji Deity in response to archaka supreme sacrifice on the bell of Alampur temple in 2001 (Now in Telangana State) made His temple the ground zero for the movement against the draconian 30/87 AP Endowments Act " pgurus.com/the-dharmik-fi…
AP Archaka Samakhya by supporting Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement today repaying debt of Archaka community to Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity who protected our rights when the Society failed in its dharmik duty & left Archakas to fend for themselves
Dec 8th 2001 also marks the day when Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity reinforced the dharmik message of pious purpose of a Deity's incarnation which is to increase devotion in devotees leading to Moksha not income from them the prevalent purpose of Secular Govt control of Hindu temples.
AP Archaka Samakhya historic organization to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
"Subject: Reference to Council of Ministers to Expedite recognition of Art 26 Right to Protect of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity under Art 78 (C) read with Art 60 "
"Our Organization Andhra Pradesh Archaka Samakhya which represents lakhs of Archakas of Andhra Pradesh has been fighting for Art 26 Hindu Deity Rights for several decades as it is the duty of every Archaka to fight for the rights of Deity"
"We whole heartedly support the representation on behalf of Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity
We have also perused historic letter of support of @People4Dharma Organization dated 28th Nov 2020 and wholeheartedly support the appeal made to your Excellency"
When SC rejected Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity rights petition Feb10th & did not add Deity rights Q judicial process correct Sabarimala Judgement reached dead end
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn can advise u Art 78(C) w Art 60 fulfill promise thru notification
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn who has right to advice Cabinet as per directions issued to President Secretariat by First President Dr Rajendra Prasad in addition to Lord Hanuman's advice to include Lord Shri Krishna's guidance 'Mat Karma Paramo Bhava i.e prioritize Deity's work
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn who received guidance of Acharyas on Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification fulfill promise made to Hindu Deities can advice Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji cabinet u Art 78(c) to protect Dharma for our welfare
Dr Rajendra Prasad our first President who was conscious of his Art 60 oath as a defender of Constitution had given instructions to his secretariat one relating to Art 78 (C) are important reproduced below from the book "President and the Indian Constitution by Valmiki Choudhary
The President clearly has the power to advice the Cabinet and also ask for any important item to be considered by it and once advice of the Cabinet is tendered he is bound by it. As the rep of Nation's Dharma he can use these powers to ensure protection of Dharma basic feature.
When SC violates principle यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः basic structure through interpretation of Constitution saying Hindu Deities have no Constitutional rights and further does not allow a Hindu Deity to represent on question of law the Deity can approach President