2,800 lorries are now stranded in Kent, with many drivers not even having access to basic facilities. The government appears to have done nothing to help them.
Meanwhile a Sikh charity that's more used to aiding victims of wars and natural disasters is stepping in to provide bottled water and hundreds of hot meals for stranded drivers.
CORRECTION: I missed the bit at the end that says in the absence of a PCR test, you can instead use an antigen test which is sensitive to the new strain of the virus, from a list provided by the French health ministry.
So it looks like the government finally has a use for the millions of lateral flow tests they bought from Innova, after care homes and directors of public health refused to back their use over concerns that they may miss many people who have the virus.
I wonder if the French are aware that the Innova test missed almost a third of people with higher viral load (PCR positive at below Ct 25) during trials in Liverpool?
If so, it's curious they're allowing that as proof that someone doesn't have the virus.
In case you wonder why everyone's so alarmed, daily case numbers in London, the South East and the East of England are rising VERY rapidly.
Much faster than the second wave in the North and Midlands in the autumn.
And the rest of the country seems to be edging up again now too.
Hospital admissions in those areas are now rising rapidly as well, with the East of England actually seeing the most new admissions when you adjust for population.
Both the East of England and South East have now passed the number of covid patients they had in hospitals at the peak of the first wave.
London is half way to its first wave peak and rising rapidly.
And the first wave was in the spring, when hospitals are generally quieter.
The good news is the LFTs only gave 2 false positives out of 3,199 tests checked by PCR. That gives a false positive rate of 0.07%, far less than the 0.38% reported in initial tests.
The bad news is they missed 23 of the 45 PCR positives, giving a 51% false negative rate!
We already knew the Innova LFTs were less sensitive than PCR, but they were meant to catch 95% of people with "higher viral load".
In the Liverpool trial though they missed 15% of people who were positive at below 20 cycles on PCR, and 47% of people positive at 20-25 cycles!
You'd think the Brexit Party would have other things on their mind at the moment, but instead they seem to have latched onto a misleading story about false positives.
Unsurprisingly it doesn't show what they think it shows.
For starters, Cambridge are using pooled testing, which none of the regular test system is.
This means mixing several samples together to reduce the number of tests you need to run, then if a pool is positive you individually test everyone in that pool to see who had the virus.
But a recent study suggests pooling causes false positives.
They tested 17,945 pools. 2,084 of them were positive. When they tested the people in those pools individually, they didn't get any positives from 92.
We'll sadly never know how much more music he might have written had covid-19 not come along.
But people reaching that age have in many ways already beaten the odds. Life expectancy for an 85 year old male is about another 6 years, in both the UK and US.
Behind the statistics, every death from covid-19 is tragic.
Just because someone was old or had pre-existing conditions making them more vulnerable to covid doesn't mean they couldn't have led a full, happy and productive life for many more years if the virus hadn't intervened.
This week's Test & Trace report shows cases falling sharply in the week to November 25th, thanks to lockdown 2.0.
There's also a sudden big improvement in contact tracing performance (which turns out to be smoke and mirrors), and some odd revisions to old pillar 1 testing data.
Cases in England were falling sharply towards the end of November, with both the number and percentage of people testing positive falling by about a quarter compared to the previous week.
There's a small drop in the number of tests done, but it may well be due to reduced demand.
In case there's any doubt about the effectiveness of lockdowns, regional data shows clearly that all areas where cases were level or still rising when lockdown 2.0 began started falling in perfect unison about a week later.
The question now is whether that can be sustained.