New: Progressive Democrats have pushed for reforms based on Edward Snowden's leaks, but they have been relatively silent amid a campaign to get President Trump to pardon him. huffpost.com/entry/democrat… via @HuffPostPol
Very unlikely Trump will do it, but advocates think it is the best window they may ever have.
Why this is a story: Progressive Dems have been at the forefront of efforts to end or curtail the mass surveillance programs Snowden uncovered.
But while 3 Republicans and Amash have called for a pardon, just @TulsiGabbard has on Dem side.
“Lawmakers should celebrate and protect the brave people who expose government abuse and corruption, regardless of who is in the White House when it happens,” says @evan_greer of @fightfortheftr.
I asked 19 of the 20* progressive signatories of a letter that helped prompt Section 215 of the Patriot Act to expire, as well as @rokhanna, @RepJayapal, Sens. Wyden, Leahy, Durbin and Heinrich about the pardon ...
... The 20th, @AOC, already told @jeremyscahill that she believes Snowden "should be considered" for a pardon. (I didn't count that as a full endorsement.)
The only member whose office responded to my inquiry were Rep. Gwen Moore and Sen. Ron Wyden. Neither supports a pardon.
Bernie, an early and persistent critic of mass surveillance, supports clemency -- ie, a plea deal for leniency -- over a pardon.
.@ggreenwald believes that Democrats are less supportive of Snowden's actions than other leakers, and less protective of him personally, because he leaked when Obama was president.
“This is a test of principle over partisanship, and Democrats are woefully failing it."
Civil liberties-minded Democrats "need to understand that the possibility of pushing back against the surveillance state is in large part a function of Snowden’s good deeds," @DavidSegalRI of @demandprogress
Here's the catch: I reached out to @ACLU and @EFF about whether they would also call on Democrats to join the pardon campaign. They declined comment.
One source in the civil liberties community tells me that there's a tactical belief that Dem appeals wouldn't help Snowden.
.@ggreenwald thinks, by contrast, that making the pardon calls bipartisan could help. “I think Trump does like the idea of being applauded across the spectrum."
Why the focus on Snowden, rather than say, Reality Winner?
Timing. Trump has signaled openness to Snowden, rather than Winner, who leaked during his presidency.
Either way, this is something of a philosophical question for Democrats about their take on politically-motivated leakers and whistleblowers. They didn't call for a Snowden pardon under Obama either, when liberal groups were more outspoken.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of the post-election debate over the direction of the Democratic Party has been between the "center-left" and the "left" ...
... But there is also a more obscure, though fervent and important debate between what is sometimes called the paleo-left or conversely, "post-left," and both the neoliberal center and the intersectional, activist left embodied by the Squad ...
... Figures on the "post left" -- or traditional, Marxist or labor-oriented left -- believe that the intersectional left has become too focused on cultural movements and symbolic causes that lack a mass, working-class constituency ...
John McCain said the exact same thing in 2014 as part of a media blitz designed to pressure Obama into intervening more directly in Ukraine. Obama more or less didn't bite, refusing the Ukrainians lethal aid until the very end. politico.com/story/2014/03/…
Incidentally, when Romney called Russia the United States' biggest threat in 2012 it was also cause for mockery: washingtonpost.com/news/fact-chec…
The facts about U.S.-Russia relations have since changed, but some of the fundamental questions about how to preserve peace in a world dominated by a handful of nuclear-armed nations remain roughly the same.
Ah yes, trying to score political points on a congresswoman frivolously accused of anti-semitism by ... mocking her Hanukkah greeting?
This is to say nothing of the merits of this historical parallel which are questionable. They were restoring Jewish sovereignty in response to religious repression imposed by an imperial power.
And as @NickBaumann and I noted in this deep dive, Hannukkah was a Jewish civil war and the rabbis of the Talmud downplayed the militaristic component of Hanukkah for a host of political reasons: huffpost.com/entry/real-his…
My one critique of the excellent @JaneMayerNYer report on Feinstein's decline is that she is a little too soft on Democrats for not nudging her out in 2018 ... newyorker.com/news/news-desk…
... Sure, Feinstein may have insisted on running again, but it was Democrats' choice to rally to her side against @kdeleon, an accomplished legislator and the son of Guatemalan immigrants.
This was Exhibit 1,783 in how the Democratic establishment selectively uses racial representation when it suits its interests.
Other examples include backing Cuomo over Nixon and Rahm over Chuy Garcia.
New: I did an overview of Gov. Newsom's choices to replace Kamala Harris in the Senate. Pressure groups are divided into three camps: Advocates for a Black woman; advocates for a Latino; and advocates for someone LGBTQ. Plus, ideological gaps within each: huffpost.com/entry/gavin-ne…
I hoped to shed more light on what frontrunner California Secretary of State Alex Padilla's policy agenda and interests are.
I struggled to come up with details about that, which is its own statement about the politics here. "Inoffensive liberal" seems like the best description.
There is a small, but significant faction pulling for former state Senate President Kevin de Léon, arguing that his run against Sen. Dianne Feinstein showed a prescient "chutzpah."
That includes the Imperial County Democratic Central Committee.