The idea was borne of my endless lament that global news coverage has disappeared. If you've been following me for a while, you know what I have to say about this, but I finally decided to do something about it--and so did 68 of my friends.
Want to listen to one of our editorial meetings? Here's our first podcast. We got on a Zoom call to ask ourselves, “So, what makes a story for the Cosmopolitan Globalists different from any other?” claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-first-po…
(We also asked why Piero’s friend, a fully-qualified engineer, believes the earth is flat, and we adopted Vivek’s turtle as our mascot—all the way down.🐢🐢🐢)
Here's our first big story: my co-editor @VivekYKelkar--whose remit is Hawaii to the Urals--explores the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and what it means for the future of the Pacific: claireberlinski.substack.com/p/forget-it-ja…
The next day, even though we had decided the CG did not (and frankly could not) chase breaking news, the breaking news was so mesmerizing that we had to write about it, because we couldn't concentrate on anything else. So we wrote this:
That was a trick question. They didn't handle it differently. They both failed. The widespread perception to the contrary is owed to what Freud termed "the narcissism of small differences."
On the next day, we received our first Letter to the Editor--and it was one terrific letter. From Adam Garfinkle. claireberlinski.substack.com/p/china-the-7t… We published it, along with @VivekYKelkar's reply. And soon we'll have a podcast, with Adam, discussing it.
Yesterday, to conclude launch week, we chortled at @navalny's amazing caper--the best story we've heard or read this century. claireberlinski.substack.com/p/launch-week-… If you haven't heard it, don't deprive yourself.
And on the seventh day, we ended the work which we had done, and we rested on the seventh day from all our work which we had done. Then we blessed the Cosmopolitan Globalist and and we sanctified it by tweeting about it.
Have you signed up for @cosmo_globalist? You really should. Signing up is absolutely free.
"Free? But how can you possibly afford to give this away, Claire?"
Well, among other things, more newsletters: We can't afford to do this unless lots of people subscribe. But in the future, you'll also get super-secret behind-the-paywall content--when we move to our dedicated website--and lots of other perks.
For example, once we've all got our new messenger RNA, we'll invite you to something terrific.
"Like what?"
Well, it won't be a cruise. (We've read our David Foster Wallace.)
But it will be something way more fun.
Maybe we'll all go to Burning Man together. Or whatever's cool when the pandemic is over; we guess it probably won't be Burning Man. There will definitely be perks for people who subscribe.
And there will be lots more writing, from around the world--exploring the world’s most interesting problems from a genuinely global perspective.
So please subscribe. And please share the Cosmopolitan Globalists with your friends:
And if you'd like to write for us, get in touch. We're still short on good writers in quite a few countries in East Asia, Africa, South America, and the Middle East.
Do you think Anglophone coverage of your country is preposterous verging on lunatic?
Or, indeed, altogether absent?
Do you think you can do better?
We probably agree.
Send me a DM. Let's see whether you've got the right stuff.
PS: If you subscribed to Claire Berlinski's Invariably Interesting Thoughts, you're already subscribed. We're using the same Substack platform. You don't have to do a thing: You'll keep getting the same newsletter you love--only bigger, better, faster, and open longer.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Merry Christmas, Christian friends! I know that for many of you, this will be the first Christmas you've spent alone in your home, far from your family, and bereft of your Christmas traditions.
Fortunately, Jews are here to help you get through this. See, this is what we always do on Christmas, and over the years, we've developed pandemic-proof Christmas traditions that you too can adopt. Here's how you do it:
This is the most astonishing story you'll read in the 21st century. Navalny--having been poisoned by the FSB--gets on the phone, calls the FSB--on their landline--and tells them he's "Maxim Ustinov, an aide to [Chairman of Russia’s Security Council, Nikolai] Patrushev.”
There is no such person. Doesn't matter. He gets through to Konstantin Kudryavtsev, an FSB guy who graduated from the Military Biological-Chemical Academy then worked in the biowar Institute of the Ministry of Defense.
He rips Kudryavtsev a new asshole.
"How come Navalny's still ALIVE, you sack of--"
Kudryavtsev stammers something about it maybe not being a good idea to talk about this on an open line ...
(Btw, @bellingcat, this MUST be made into a movie. Write the screenplay tonight. Navalny can play himself.)
The strangest thing is that this is true in France--the misty-eyed business--even though literally *on the same métro ride* you can go from the Bastille to Kléber, Austerlitz, Wagram and right through to Invalides.
One assumes everyone here knows why they're named that way. Even if they were never taught in school, "Invalides" is a a sinister hint. The whole city is an inescapable memorial to French history, yet ... misty-eyed? About a revolution that visibly failed on its own terms? Why?
I just don't get it. Keep me far, far away from any event that might be memorialized one day by a métro station.
I’d like to know why Russia’s so good at hacking. @Kasparov63, I remember what you had to say about the way the USSR cultivated chess champions. The Soviet Union churned out brilliant logicians and mathematicians like Kolmogorov by the metric ton;
and even though Stalin purged them enthusiastically* (and he couldn't possibly have understood or really cared about their work, right?) the nomenklatura did *not* fail to spot useful military applications.
Is there something about the Russian education system--or Russian culture--that cultivates good hackers? (Or perhaps something that dissuades the kind of people who have those talents from using them in other careers where they'd be an advantage?)
I know I speak for everyone in saying how much I hate this pandemic. But I hate this pandemic more than I've ever hated anything.
I've been lucky. Obviously, I haven't died of it. I haven't even had it. Neither have any of my loved ones--
though we've had a few exposures and scares. Nor am I a doctor, or a nurse, who's watched all her beloved elderly patients die, like @ASkarimbas.
But yesterday, a friend mentioned that his mom's in intensive care. Everyone I know's out of work.
I'm not even complaining about being out of work--writers and journalists have been out of work for years anyway--but it doesn't help to be out of all my *other* options for making pocket money, like teaching.
Thank you, @edwardlucas. I'm not sure it's brilliant, per se, but do think the problem I'm describing is important. It's not just a grammarian's lament, though it's that. Within my lifetime, "being educated" meant you could write minimally literate, clear, workmanlike prose--
--not "brilliant" prose, a separate issue altogether. But everyone qualified for a high-level job in government or industry was, until pretty recently, able to write simply and clearly. You'd have the occasional mishap, a dangling participle or something. But nothing like this.
Overall, educated people understood that in business and government, you had to write a certain way: Especially during an emergency, the writing should be clear, and no sentence should have three errors in grammar and six plausible and distinct interpretations.