Does anyone read with sane mind or do you change sides like chameleon?
I saw numerous ppl telling @KanganaTeam to delete this tweet saying it hurts the sentiments.
No!
It does not!
It should not !
She hasnt compared herself to any form of supreme goddess.
She has compared on how our society treats two forms of feminine differently. One who is a deity will never be seen disrespectfully in whatever avatar she appears.
On the other hand,a human form of the energy,is demeaned & demolished,for wearing an outfit of her desire & choice.
They come in the DMs,will ask for nude$,Will sIut shame anyone in a blink of an eye & than call thmselves the Contractors,the thekedars of Dharma!
No1 has the right to abuse a female for what she chose to wear.
@KanganaTeam wore a bikini & this is how than got objectified.
You cannot worship a goddess and at the same time abuse a living being. That is the worst karma ever !
Every female, who is called out for wearing what she wants, is sIut shamed for choosing a dress of her own choice should stand up against this systematic abuse of Society !
Coz clothes do not define character.
The clothes are not going to change the world, but the women wearing them will !
Do not be chameleons who change their colors according to their surroundings. Do not crush anyone's integrity and than call yourself a proud Indian.🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
She has been posting about Late Sridevi's death by posting govt letters which are not at all credible. And minting popularity by Forging Govt documents is a big big crime. So pour in your inputs too !
The autopsy report posted by her is totally fake. This has not been declared by @uaegov !
The 1st is the ICJ letter posted by her and the 2nd is the Format I found.
People asked me.
Why did I not initiate a Police complaint on @KaurBmusic & @neerubajwa along with making @TwitterIndia & @Facebook as accomplices & @aajtak today, for allowing the distorted map of India to be on their platforms, which was certainly done with ulterior motives.
Here is my reason.
I had filed a complaint on Kunal Kamra for Contempt of Court on 11th Nov. 2020. It got accepted on 18th Nov. 2020. It is yet to get listed. But, there won't be any further damage,even if the process is getting delayed.
The situation of Farmers Bill is Complex.
We cannot afford loosing time in the longer legal process because the nexus that is working on other side will not leave one stone unturned in hijacking the whole real issue and making it all about their agendas and propagandas. That is exactly what they did during Shaheen Bagh.
So once again,bringing out concrete proofs on how this Protest is nothing but an outline drawn by the Middlemen, Arhtiyas, Khalistani Supporters & Rioters.
The above images are of Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU)'s Kisaan Manifesto of 2019 with their demands listed.(crt @krrrrrrishna)
Their demands include
1. ABOLISHMENT OF MANDI (APMC) 2. ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT. 3. FREEDOM FROM ARHTIYA SYSTEM ( MIDDLEMEN)
Now, the new Farm Law, is helping in removing the Arhtiyas, by giving the Farmers a free choice of selling their products where they want.
How in any manner is the new law passed by @UPGovt anti-fundamental rights ?
My take :
1. The new law passed is to save the women section to go through forceful conversion for the sake of marriage.
2. If anyone has wilfully chosen to change the religion, there is no stoppage to it. Freedom of religion is a fundamental right and it has been maintained.
3. We already have a Special Marriage Act wherein DM has to be informed about inter faith marriage.
4. The New Law will in fact, save the fundamental right under article 21 - Right to liberty and life i.e. No one can force anyone to do something against one's will - which includes forceful, coerced conversions for the sake of marriage.
With all due respect, but Hon'ble Judges could have used the power vested upon the HC u/a 226 and granted relief to Arnab.
The order in the case of Maharashtra chess association vs. Union of India (2019) observes as below :
The SC bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud & Indira Bannerjee:
1. Mere existence of alternate remedy does not create a bar on high courts writ jurisdiction.
2.The existence of alternate remedy whether adequate or not does not alter the fundamentally discretionary nature of the High Courts Writ Jurisdiction...
... and therefore does not create an absolute legal bar on the exercise of the Writ jurisdiction by a High Court.
3. The intention behind this self imposed rule is clear.If the HC were to exercise their writ jurisdiction so widely as to regularly override statutory appellate..