@franifio How did Putin get Trump nominated? Trump had to get nominated for Putin to get him elected. Your answer must include evidence, including documents, testimony, and other forms of evidence as defined in the Federal Code of Criminal Procedure, The Rules of Evidence.
@franifio I have the answer to how Trump got nominated, and the evidence, which is considerable. Putin had nothing to do with it.
@franifio Here we go---First, Hillary asked her friends in the media to "elevate" Trump as she wanted to run against him.

medium.com/@bjcampbell/th…

observer.com/2016/10/wikile…
@franifio The media did exactly what they were asked to do by Hillary for America and DNC executives--They promoted Trump.

thestreet.com/politics/donal…
@franifio Late in the campaign, Bill Clinton called Obamacare "crazy."

cnn.com/2016/10/04/pol…
@franifio Obama gave an interview concerning illegal immigrants voting. It caused a controversy that helped galvanize Trump's voters to turn out no matter what the polls said.

247sports.com/college/west-v…
@franifio The polls showing Hillary to be a "shoo-in" and the only questions being how large her majority would be and how long her coattails down ballot actually damaged Hillary's turnout.

cnn.com/2016/10/23/pol…
@franifio Did the DNC and Podesta emails have much effect on the election? Well, not according to the Steele Dossier, whose supporters keep telling us was "not disproven." Steele's sources told him Putin was disappointed in the impact the emails had on the campaign. It's right in there.
@franifio I suppose it didn't help when Putin had Fancy Bear hack the DNC when Cozy Bear already had ADMINISTRATIVE ACCESS to the entire network and already transmitted to Moscow from the DNC. Fancy Bear used brute force to break through the firewall and penetrate the network exposing...
@franifio ...their presence and bringing on CrowdStrike's incident response that resulted in the theory that Putin was trying to elect Trump and the DNC emails were part of that alleged scheme. Only a real covert operation would have succeeded, but it wasn't covert even if true.
@franifio @threadreaderapp Need an unroll, please, for Redi-Link and future use! Thanks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farrier105

8 Nov
@RichHiggins_DC Total Votes by Position, GOP and Democrat

Congress: GOP Democrat Totals
257,487 182,632 440,119

President 257,005 275,293 532,298

Difference 482 -92,661 -92,179

Drill down:
@RichHiggins_DC The problem is there are votes just for President totaling 92,179 as opposed to the candidates for Member of Congress (MC). If the Democrat candidate for MC and the GOP for MC had split the difference, there wouldn't be an issue.
@RichHiggins_DC This reflects electronic votes or paper ballots with votes only for President, and not for MC. Those votes went to Biden. That is clear by the numbers. This needs explained. See, if votes went to the MC candidates in that quantity, that would cover it. These votes only...
Read 8 tweets
6 Nov
@MariaBartiromo The system used in Arizona's voting sounds a lot like the one we used in Venango County, Pennsylvania. If the ballot is good, and you removed your ballot stub, the votes are scanned in and the ballot is RETAINED by the machine.
This means you have an electronic tabulation of each individual vote, which is likely tagged by ballot number, mine was 15. You have controls like total votes by candidate, total votes for all candidates (hash totals) that can be matched by the darkened circles on the ballots.
The number of each ballot is also tagged to the voter's name, which means in a recount, your vote might no longer be secret, but anyone auditing the results could have the option of contacting voters directly to ask about ballot numbers and if they voted at all.
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law Looks like Q was bowing out anyway regardless of who would win the election.
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law The point I tried to make in my earlier post to @Barnes_Law was that it was significant that the Q channels were deplatformed by You Tube just before the election. My reasoning was that the whole Q Legend does not work without Trump as President.
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law As the Legend (which is intelligence speak for false biography to provide a cover to an operative) of Q goes, Q heads up a secret group in intel and military working with Trump to apprehend (during "The Storm") the cabal trying to take over the world.
Read 12 tweets
31 Oct
@ai_jared I tried using a timeline to suggest what probably happened after the Mid-Term elections. I forgot to include Trump's decision to not declassify Trump-Russia-Wikileaks documents just before the Mid-Term election of 2018. I think that ties in with the other events.
@ai_jared September 21, 2018--Trump reverses decision to declassify Trump-Russia-Wikileaks documents.

November 7, 2018---Democrats win House majority in mid-term elections.

November 8, 2018---Trump fires Attorney General Jeff Sessions
@ai_jared December 7, 2018--Trump nominates William Barr to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General.

January 4, 2019---Mueller granted six months extension on Trump-Russia-Wikileaks grand jury.

February 14, 2019--Barr confirmed by Senate as Attorney General.
Read 16 tweets
30 Oct
@CBSNews "the New England Patriots of messing with elections"

Now, just how can that be? Let's take a look at the history of the intelligence about Russian interference in elections.
@CBSNews We have to go back to 2014 to find where the saga of "Russian Interference" began. It is early spring and John Brennan is on the ropes with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Investigated by the committee because of the torture stories in the media, Brennan is now...
@CBSNews ...struggling. His answer was to HACK the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) to find out what SSCI knows and how they know it. Brennan's hack is detected, and now he has a hacking investigation to go with torture. It was at this point that the...
Read 36 tweets
6 Oct
@MariaBartiromo @MorningsMaria @FoxBusiness 1. Haspel was involved in the CIA torture scandal.
2. Brennan hacked the Senate Select Committee on Intel while they were investigating the torture.
3. Brennan had issued false intel reports during to cover the intel received from torture.
@MariaBartiromo @MorningsMaria @FoxBusiness 4. Brennan lied about hacking the SSCI, and by May 2014 found himself mired in the SSCI investigation.
5. Brennan gave Obama an intel report in May 2014 that Russia was planning to interfere in other countries' elections. One aspect of interference: Stealing emails and
@MariaBartiromo @MorningsMaria @FoxBusiness publishing them.
6. Obama warned Putin about 2014 UKRAINIAN elections.
7. In 2015, the alleged "Cozy Bear" attack by Russia's FSB or SVR is discovered inside the DNC's network. The FBI does nothing despite the 2014 Brennan intel report, assuming, of course, the report was real.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!