A: Hindu-excluding scholarship schemes of @narendramodi govt.
Scholarships are distributed in religious proportion of the census. So Muslims get 70%+ of these. Hindus, of course, are ineligible, you wouldn't want kaffirs to get resources, would you?
Ms. "clued-in" can you give me a list of countries around the world, which has religion-based scholarships for "minorities", with fewer rights to majority to run schools or temples? Do you even understand there is no doctrinal majority in India? I'll wait.
There is *NO* federal program for religious minorities in the US.
Also Muslims and Christians are not "historically disadvantaged" in India. Rather they are former colonizers— like White minority under apartheid in SA.
Christians and Muslims in India are "historically disadvantaged groups"? 🤣
If you're claiming scholarships for "religious minorities" are common, you should find dozens of examples where Hindus get this in govt schemes around the world, no? Think.
Numerical minorities are different from "historically disadvantaged minorities." Billionaires are a numerical minority, shall we have special schemes for them?
India underwent Islamic and Christian colonization—these are not "historically disadvantaged."
You are fighting for apartheid privilege for former colonizers @NotSoAblaNari, much like White privilege in South Africa. Think. They have set and controlled the narrative as world-dominant forces (not "disadvantaged minorities") and you've fallen for it.
Stop bs'ing. Give evidence of 100s of countries providing govt scholarships and schemes based on religion for religious minorities, including Hindus (Hindus are a minority in most of these countries and a global minority.) Concrete schemes—not bhashan.
You claim "what hundreds of countries and un have pledged to undertake as its common knowledge." This kind of bs is not evidence. Show govt schemes for all "religious minorities" like India has in these hundred countries, or even in ten.
To be clear, schemes for ethnic or racial minorities are NOT the same as for religious minorities. Religion is changeable. No country has a scheme which specifically excludes only one majority "religion" from government scholarship programs. Only India.
In India this a continuation of colonial rule and jaziya tax. All the discourse in India about "persecuted minorities" is for the 2 world-dominant religions who colonized & ruled India, not for Parsis or Jains.
Why? It is a powerplay for conversion by dominant global religions.
To cut through the BS here's a sample of what "data" means.
Go to the Govt of India website and you can find a list of GOVT scholarships disbursed by *religion*—for all major religions, *except* the majority. Find me tables like this from other countries. minorityaffairs.gov.in/SCHEMES/PERFOR…
This on the other hand, is an example of BS'ing. Does not even understand what data means.
A table, by religion, of government scholarship grants to all minority religions which excludes the majority.
Lots of hope. The other side just has BS, can't even answer a simple question. 😏 For religion-based minority schemes they start listing "social, economic, ethnic, racial." Everything *but* religion-based schemes. Need to call out their BS, expose them.
Muslim professor of Islamic theology concludes Mohammad probably never existed. Fascinating, historical evidence for Jesus was always questionable, but more recent research is coming up with fundamental holes in the other prophet story as well.
Though evidence points to Ram being a historical figure, his historicity is not central to Sanatan Dharma. Dharma remains, whether or not Ram was king of Ayodhya.. This isn't the same for "Jesus" or "Mohammad"—Christianity/Islam have no basis without them.
This guy claims to be an atheist.
Has a meltdown because a Hindu woman just questioned whether Hindus should celebrate Christmas.
Doxes her and complains to her employer in the US.
Has no problem targeting a Hindu minority in the US to defend the world’s most dominant religion.
Check the size of the tech industry in China (including IT), and the number of patents they have in Artificial Intelligence, and then come back and tell me about the "English advantage" in your industry.
Only a moronic country has the medium of education in their country to cater to the less than 0.01% that may migrate to a foreign county. China is no moron. Guess who is.
Out of the blue are, take out China, which with Communism as the state religion is de factor Abrahamic (and as totalitarian as the other two). Shows you who the minority is.
True Christians wouldn't celebrate December 25 as "Jesus' Birthday." Jesus, even if he lived, was certainly not born on December 25, which was a pagan holiday.
Christmas is a symbol of cultural appropriation and erasure—a pagan festival was erased for Church's imperialism.
What if that religion disparages every other one, has institutions dedicated to attacking other religions teaching the subject of Polemics, has led to the genocide of millions around the world and is committed to the erasure of your traditions?