IM Profile picture
27 Dec, 8 tweets, 3 min read
Here’s a thread on episode 10 million of modeling failure & the experts & media who never face any criticism for inaccuracy & fear mongering

Today’s episode is Arizona!

First, let’s check the headlines. Both the ASU & U of A modeling groups predicted disaster by late December
Here’s some text from the ASU modeling projection

“The amount of people specifically in hospital ICUs is also projected to reach record-breaking numbers under every projection”

“Hospitals in Arizona and Maricopa County may become over capacity”
The University of Arizona modeling team went further, calling for a shelter in place order and immediate implementation of a statewide mask mandate because hospitals would reach total capacity by “late December” and have no available hospital beds
So what’s happened in reality with none of their suggestions implemented? No shelter in place, no immediate statewide mask mandate?

Well UA sent their letter on 11/27. ICU availability was 11% on 11/27. In the most recent update, ICU availability is now…10%.
When ASU sent out their modeling update on 11/17 predicting catastrophe at Arizona hospitals essentially no matter what, inpatient bed availability was 11%.

Today it’s…11%
So here’s my question. Why is anyone still listening to them? Why is the media reporting what they say as if it has any predictive value?

Why is no one asking them how they continue to be so wrong? Why is no one asking them why none of their suggestions seem to be necessary?
These are the same people and same modeling groups that have been wrong about everything since March, and apparently no one who matters, who can influence public opinion, has learned that they have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.
But every time they spread this nonsense, the media breathlessly reports it with zero criticism, zero push back or questioning. Just more and more panic and fear mongering. Zero accountability or follow up. Just awful.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with IM

IM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ianmSC

21 Dec
Slovakia has been hailed by outlets like The Atlantic for their Covid response, mostly because they mandated masks extremely early and their leaders “led by example” by wearing them

Wonder if we’ll see any updates now that their rates have exploded? Somehow I doubt it!
Oh and even more recently, a study in the UK said mass testing in Slovakia cut the infection rate by 60%. Literally a few days after they published, infections rose again and are now higher than they’ve ever been
Read 4 tweets
18 Dec
The news media is pouncing all over the story that Southern California has no available ICU beds

Have they checked the state dashboard? Cause here’s what ICU availability actually is:

LA: 338
SD: 168
Orange: 79
San Bernardino: 41
Riverside: 29
Ventura: 35
Santa Barbara: 37 Image
LA, Orange, San Diego, San Bernardino ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec
Los Angeles County reported over 22,400 new cases today, one of the highest numbers reported by any STATE during the entire outbreak

Cases are up 2269% since the initial mask mandate &
349% since they put in a curfew & closed outdoor dining

None of this works. None of it.
I know that the mask cult will always say it would have been worse without masks, but a 2,269% increase is uh…bad.

The recent case curve is literally a straight line up. It cannot get worse than that.
I do not know how you could do worse than the combination of some of the worst Covid rates in the world, economic destruction, and massive restrictions on freedom and liberty than what LA has done in 2020.

It is a masterpiece of incompetence that only LA could achieve
Read 4 tweets
12 Dec
So the BBC, with an assist from some professional misinformation specialists in universities, has gotten into the mask lies spreading game, with an atrocious article saying masks worked in Brookings County, South Dakota compared to others in SD

Here’s a thread on how they lied
They chose to start on 9/1, because they got to ignore that Brookings saw a huge increase throughout August. Starting from 8/1 shows the month long growth

At peak on 9/7 Brookings had a case rate 242% higher than Minnehaha, on 11/30 Minnehaha was only 62% higher than Brookings
They also ignored that cases were already on the way down before the mandate & the decline actually stopped and starting going up 2 weeks after the mandate

No explanation for why it wasn’t until early November that Brookings did better, and still had the highest rate in October
Read 4 tweets
7 Dec
Let’s look at just the past few months in Southern California

They’ve all followed the same curve, regardless of what was open. LA has never had movie theaters or indoor dining, while San Diego & Orange did.

Even w/nothing open, LA has done much worse
Rational, reasonable people might look at this and say, hmm….maybe businesses closures aren’t that important, since the trends are the same

Unfortunately, we do not have rational, reasonable people in California. So what is the state doing? Pushing what failed in Los Angeles
So let’s look at the trends in SD & OC by closures

On 11/9, San Diego’s 7-day avg was 135 cases per million, on 12/6 it was 477 per million, a 253% increase

On 11/16, Orange County’s avg was 136 per million, on 12/6 it was 407, a 199% increase

Working perfectly
Read 4 tweets
5 Dec
@ConceptualDoc I gotta tell ya, your combo of intellectual dishonesty, willful ignorance and hypocrisy is incredibly frustrating.

And the German study and links you’ve posted are much worse than “memes” because they’re essentially lying with credentials.
Leading some susceptible people into thinking they have value when they don’t.

It’s fine to not control for other variables as long as “peers” sign off.

Compliance data is inaccurate, but your anecdotal assumptions are fine.
These countries that don’t use masks at all and have lower death and case rates aren’t relevant because I say they aren’t, because their conclusions poke giant holes in my assumptions.

It’s pretty bleak and frustrating that you’re so unable to understand your own bias
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!