$ZIL ecosystem has grown rapidly in the last few quarters and at least some of it can be attributed to the cascading network effect of seed node staking. A thread on observations, thoughts and ideas on taking it to the next-level (bundled together with some tangible numbers).
👇
1/ Staking has so far locked around USD 400 million of $ZIL. In fact, the underlying incentive design has converted passive community members into daily active network users. And the numbers do speak. Since its launch, the daily txn volume on the network has increased by ~40%.
2/ The most immediate network effect of staking came in the form of $gZIL -- an ecosystem-wide governance token issued alongside staking rewards. $gZIL itself has driven a quarter million on-chain transactions (in the form of token transfers).
3/ The next impact of staking was on ZILSwap -- a DEX. $gZIL + $ZIL pool is the largest on ZILSwap. The $gZIL + $ZIL pool alone has over half a million in liquidity. $gZIL has also been the most traded asset on ZILSwap cumulatively reaching over USD 4.4 million since its launch.
4/ I believe that staking has potential for further cascading effect. Take the staking contract for example, we are looking at USD 400 million of $ZIL locked in there. This trapped liquidity is begging for another application to make use of it.
5/ This is where @DevPillar protocol may chip in. @chanwen_ is fiddling with this idea, where you delegate your $ZIL to a vault contract, which then stakes on behalf of you with the staking contract. Staking contract then issues $bZIL -- short for bonded $ZIL to you.
6/ Say for every 100 $ZIL staked, you get 75 $bZIL. You could now take your $bZIL and use it as a collateral in Pillar and borrow Pillar stablecoin. If the parameters are set right, it would be possible to pay back the interest rate for the loan via your staking returns.
7/ Another idea is around seed node operators themselves. These operators are currently serving API request for transaction data and help users connect with the Zilliqa network for sending their transactions. These operators can double up as a Chainlink-like oracle network.
8/ And the best part is that they already have an incentive coming from staking. So, no real need to issue any other token. Seed node operators could serve oracle requests such as price data in the same way they are currently providing Zilliqa network data.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some observations and thoughts on ZILSwap: What went well, its impact on the $ZIL ecosystem and where we need to improve with some concrete plans that are being worked on. A thread:
👇
1/ ZILSwap was launched by @SwitcheoNetwork on Oct 5, 2020 (~2 months old). Soon after, we noticed for the first time, a flurry of ZRC-2 tokens (equiv. of ERC20s on $ZIL) getting launched on the network (even though the fungible token standard had been around for a while).
2/ The ability to provide a marketplace for people to exchange tokens was the trigger for deveopers to start issuing tokens and developing a token economy. In fact, there was a token for which, the entire supply was put on a ZILSwap pool w/o any team withholding.
@zilliqa just completed a network upgrade. Five key improvements that platform users, miner and developers can expect after this release:
1⃣ Transactions can now be "soft-confirmed", as soon as they are processed within a shard. It will reduce the visible latency.
Thread 👇
2⃣ A new feature to allow tracking of transaction status. Users can now check whether their transaction was dispatched to the network, soft-confirmed, confirmed, or rejected. No more "Oops! The transaction could not be found on viewblock."
3⃣ A new governance mechanism for miners. Miners can now vote on proposals by attaching votes to their Proof-of-Work (PoW) submissions. This is in addition to the $gZIL governance.
2020 has been a year of growth for @zilliqa and $ZIL ecosystem. At the start of the year, we'd committed ourselves to launching growth initiatives on all fronts. It's great to see the community benefitting from the tangible impact that those initiatives had.
Short thread👇
1/ I regularly see off the chart growth numbers on all fronts such as general outreach, market and social sentiment, developer adoption, platform usage, and usability, dev tooling, community-run initiatives, market infrastructure, general ecosystem growth and $ZIL value capture.
2/ I must admit I do feel a bit pleased with what I see because this growth has definitely not been effortless. The team and the community together has put a lot of effort into this. Having said that, I do not feel an iota of complacency. Miles to go...
A thread for those who need more clarity on seed node staking with $ZIL that will go live very soon on #Zilliqa.
1) Seed node staking is not a full-blown PoS system. In a PoS system, staking is used to determine the validator who will propose the next block of transactions.
2) Unlike PoS, seed node staking in #Zilliqa is to allow certain non-consensus nodes called seed nodes (those that store transaction history) to earn rewards for their service. These seed nodes do not participate in validating transactions.
3) Staking rewards come from block mining. 5% of $ZIL mined in every block will be used to reward these nodes while the remaining 95% will be given to the miners who validate transactions. The split is intentionally skewed towards miners as they provide the much needed security.