1/ New PHE technical report on B.1.1.7 variant assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
2/ S dropout now appears a very good indication of B.1.1.7 in all regions.
3/ Roughly a third of swab tests are carried out with the TaqPath assay that serendipitously allows this S dropout detection of B.1.1.7.
4/ Rapid increase in proportion of tests showing S dropout 'in all age groups though most markedly in persons aged 25-49 years'
5/ Age pyramids showing the same effect
6/ There's a big analysis where they take "matched" samples of B.1.1.7 vs. other variants and find for the most part few statistically detectable differences. I'm cautious here, as if variant gave e.g. both more symptomatic cases & more hospitalisations this wld be hard to detect
7/ No differences seen in reinfections (small N in each case)
8/ Big increase seen in secondary attack rate, consistent with increased transmission (And an impressively powered analysis)

But I guess there will also be e.g. geographical differences in where the variant is and isn't which one would need to control for (hopefully they have)
9/ It does strike me that for a lot of these effects (e.g. age) there is potential for Simpson's paradox like effects
10/ Geographical map of S dropout. Would be surprised if Cumbria doesn't move up the tiers soon (cases surging in Eden). Some areas in E and SW (gray) where we don't have much data due to samples not being analysed with TaqPath for the most part.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Theo Sanderson

Theo Sanderson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @theosanderson

28 Dec
1/ We have two sources of information about the spread of the new variant. The most reliable is genomics data, but this has a lag period, and most samples can't be tested in this way.

The second is "S dropout", but it doesn't uniquely identify B.1.1.7

Graph below and short🧵
2/ B.1.1.7 has a deletion of 6 letters of RNA in the S gene, which happens to make one of the three PCR tests performed on each swab sample in the Lighthouse labs give a negative result. So these "S-negatives" can be a proxy for B.1.1.7.
3/ BUT there are other strains that also have this same "H69/70 deletion" variant. Indeed the first was seen in the UK in April, long before B1.1.7. The graph above shows these in blue. The graph represents the percentage of all genomes sequenced in these areas at various times.
Read 13 tweets
14 Dec
Any info out on the 'new strain' in phylogenetic / AA mutation terms?
Wonder if there's any chance increased circulation could be driven by false-negatives in testing. (happens in malaria with hrp2 deletion) Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!