In honor of passing 10k followers, how about a #MormonAmerica thread? (For those new: these are historical threads drawn from my current book project.)
Tonight, let's talk about the rise & fall of Amy Brown & Richard Lyman, the most significant LDS couple in the 20th century. /1
Amy Brown and Richard Lyman were born to prominent Mormon families in 1872 and 1870, respectively. They met at Brigham Young Academy in 1888 and were quickly drawn to each other. /2
Richard was tall, broad-shouldered, and exceptionally smart, not to mention handsome. Both his father and grandfather were apostles, and he was expected to succeed in both secular and ecclesiastical roles. /3
Amy was nearly a foot shorter but just as brilliant and witty. They were the most popular students at the school, and Amy was immediately added to the faculty after graduation. (#15 in this image.) /4
Though everyone expected them to marry soon, they waited until after Richard received his MA degree from Michigan. Meanwhile, Amy, who started a teaching career in SLC, soaked in the lessons of progressive America, and worried merely being a housewife would lead to "oblivion." /5
After they married, and Richard joined the University of Utah faculty, they became embedded in SLC's elite culture scene, participating in book groups and debate clubs. They represented the "modern," post-manifesto Mormon couple: monogamous, intelligent, and progressive. /6
In 1902, they travelled east: Richard to get a PhD in engineering from Cornell, and Amy to finally get further schooling, albeit over one summer, at the University of Chicago--a lifelong dream, given her father had previously refused her getting a higher education. /7
In Chicago, Amy took classes in social reform and became swept up in Progressive America's quest to redeem modernity's ills. She even got the chance to personally learn from Jane Addams's Hull House, the embodiment of the social gospel movement. /8
After their return to SLC, Amy was added to the General Relief Society Board, tasked to modernize the organization and reach a younger generation. She then became the society's most powerful figure for the next three decades. Read her vision here: churchhistorianspress.org/at-the-pulpit/… /9
A decade after that, Richard followed his father & grandfather into the apostleship, becoming one of a handful of new Quorum members with advanced degrees hoping to transform church doctrine & governance. (He's the tall guy in the back row.) /10
Throughout the 1910s, 20s, and 30s, the Lymans were a force. Amy transformed the Relief Society and made it an extension of federal relief efforts, especially during the Great Depression when she worked with the government and praised the New Deal. (She's middle-front.) /11
At one point, riding the post-suffrage wave in the 1920s, Amy even served in the Utah Legislature and held positions in national women's organizations. Richard, meanwhile, loosened LDS dogmatism, especially in the curriculum for adults and youth. /12
Besides helping change the Relief Society and the Quorum of the Twelve, the Lymans also challenged traditional gender roles. Here is a poem written by My Booth Talmage in 1923 that playfully needles their familial arrangement. /13
Both faced opposition, though. In the Q12, Richard was confronted by conservative apostles like Joseph Fielding Smith who worried they were embracing "modernist" ideas; Amy was critiqued by RS leaders like Susa Young Gates who accused her of "secularizing" the society. /14
Both of them faced their biggest challenge in J. Reuben Clark, who joined the church's First Presidency in 1933 after a career in public service. To Clark, the Lyman represented the faith's biggest threats: creeping "intelligentsia" and federal overreach (i.e., the New Deal). /15
For the next decade, Clark slowly pushed back on the reforms the Lymans had introduced, setting the faith on a different trajectory that still shapes how the institution operates today. Modern Mormonism as we know it, I argue, was birthed in these 1930s debates. /16
The clash closed in 1943. That November, Richard was caught having an affair with Anna Jacobsen Hegsted, whom he had been seeing for nearly two decades. There are debates over whether this was a polygamous union, a one-time affair, or something else--a debate for another day. /17
Regardless of the nature of the relationship, Clark and a policeman barged in on Richard and Hegsted, caught them in the act, and Richard was then publicly excommunicated. You can read more about that whole episode here: jstor.org/stable/2329260… /18
The public spectacle surrounding the drama, as you might imagine, both devastated Amy and largely disempowered her. (She was Relief Society President at the time.) Clark then moved to consolidate authority and strip the society's autonomy. /19
The Relief Society lived on, of course, but had wholly new confines, operating under priesthood control & with purely spiritual endeavors, rather than the machine of secular reform that Amy created. Women's activism persisted, but outside ecclesiastical boundaries. /20
The story of Amy Brown and Richard Lyman, then, tells the story of how modern Mormonism had several potential trajectories, lots of complicated nuances, and unexpected reversals. The church could have developed much differently under different circumstances. /fin
Let's talk about a time when Utahns rejected medical intervention as an infringement on personal rights, resulting in unnecessary suffering and death. /1
Around 1900, smallpox, a scourge that had troubled civilizations for centuries, was becoming more containable. Crude vaccines had been around for generations, but in the 1890s scientific advances made them more reliable and available, resulting in state mandates. /2
Like many states, Utah debated whether they should require vaccination. Some LDS leaders supported the measure, while others opposed. As a result of this division, and because they wanted to appear separate from the state, however, the church decided to mostly remain silent. /3
While Frederick Douglass is being recognized more and more nowadays, and his powerful anti-racist arguments are increasingly popular, I think there's another part of his legacy that is overlooked.
This is random, but here's a short thread on Douglass and religious liberty. /1
It's sometimes overlooked that Douglass's first job, after escaping slavery, was as a preacher, and many of his literacy lessons came from reading the bible. This, of course, makes sense given his frequent biblical allusions, the number of which always astound my students. /2
Yet a trenchant theme found throughout his abolitionist career was his critique of present religious institutions that supported slavery and, simultaneously, his firm belief in religiosity's importance within the nation. /3
There’s been a lot said about whether BH Roberts lost faith in the Book of Mormon. I think much of the debate is misplaced: what he was argued was not belief/unbelief, but the *nature* of belief. And the debate said a lot about modern Mormonism.
BH Roberts (1857-1933) did more than nearly anyone else to synthesize and codify Mormon thought during the faith’s transition period. As Sterling McMurrin once put it, he was neither a great historian or theologian, but he was the best historian & theologian Mormonism had. /2
Many of his documentary histories, monographs, and treaties became standard readings for the saints, and some of them remain so today. It’s a reach that very few can match.
But to his chagrin, two of his late works did not receive as much attention as he’d like. /3
Okay, so you've watched the #HamiltonFilm, and want to celebrate #FourthofJuly by digging deeper into America's founding. Here are some recommendations for books that not only cover key themes and topics from the play, but are also very engaging and approachable. /1
First, there's an excellent collection of essays by historians on the play itself, including its many meanings and misreadings, edited by @TenuredRadical. I especially like @jlpasley's essay on the modern uses of federalists like Hamilton. /2 rutgersuniversitypress.org/historians_on_…
For the American Revolution in general, there are legions of books that provide solid overviews. My favorite is Alan Taylor's, which balances military, indigenous, political, and social sides of the era. It is a comprehensive continental history. /3 wwnorton.com/books/American…
Hey y'all: today's the 176th anniversary of Joseph Smith's death at Carthage Jail. It's a pretty important date for members of the LDS Church, but allow me to argue, drawing from my #KingdomOfNauvoo book, why it's also an important part of America's history of democracy. /1
By 1844, the Mormons had been settled in Nauvoo, Illinois, their own city-state on the Illinois banks of the Mississippi River, for five years. The city housed around 12,000 citizens, with thousands more in outlying communities. It was larger than even Chicago. /2
For Joseph Smith and his followers, Nauvoo was an outpost from a fallen world, the final refuge in a society that had become too wicked and anarchic. They had already been forcibly removed from New York, Ohio, and Missouri. They felt democracy failed them. /3
The pictures of all the protests across the nation have lifted me, but this one one with the "Mormons Against Racism" sign gave me a tear. It's from Atlanta--courtesy @alleycatrn--and it struck me because of something I encountered in my #MormonAmerica research. A quick thread./1
As I mentioned in another thread, 1968 was a crossroads for both Mormonism and America when it came to race, as protests erupted across the nation. LDS Church leaders featured those both sympathetic and angered by the civil rights movement. /2
In July of that year, the First Presidency received a letter from William Nichols, who presided over the LDS stake in Atlanta. Nichols was requesting permission to take part in a multi-religious protest in favor of civil rights in the city. /3