Tomas Pueyo Profile picture
Dec 29, 2020 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The new strain of #COVID is more transmissible. Will it be deadlier?

Many ppl think not: "If a virus kills more quickly, it has fewer opportunities to spread. It's the transmission-virulence tradeoff."

Unfortunately, that's too simplistic. 🧵 Image
1. When a virus is more efficient, it reproduces faster, and that increases both transmissibility and virulence

2. The evidence of the transmission-virulence tradeoff theory is not that clear. This fantastic paper explains it well.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… Image
The devil is in the details. For example, in the early stages of a pandemic, when most ppl aren't infected (the case now with COVID), virulence tends to increase. Image
Virulence also tends to increase when the population is highly connected, as we are with COVID, which travels worldwide. Image
That means we need to turn to specifics.

3. The specifics of COVID make it an unfortunate candidate to increase virulence. Look at this graph of contagions per day after initial infection. Most infections happen before getting symptoms or early thereafter. Image
If the virus reproduced more quickly, the peak of the curve would be higher, but the right leg would be cut. On balance, would the curve be bigger or smaller? Potentially bigger, which means infectiousness could easily increase. Image
You could get more virus more quickly, thus infecting other people more and more quickly. Sure, you'd fall sick more quickly, but by that time you're not infecting as many people.
Another factor is asymptomatics. They're probably ~50% of infections but don't cause more than 5% of them. A virus that reproduces faster would make many more of them infectious, potentially exploding the number of cases. Image
And more people sicker would also mean more deaths. But these happens weeks after infection.

Death and contagiousness are so disconnected with COVID that there's no pressure for the virus to become less deadly.
4. Changes in the spike protein (what the virus uses to hack into cells) have already shown to increase contagiousness. This happened early during the pandemic. ImageImageImage
For the new strain, we know it has 3 mutations in the spike protein, we know the strain is winning, and we know those with it have more virus than others.

jagranjosh.com/general-knowle… Image
So we have a virus that is reproducing faster, is spreading faster, and has very little pressure to get less deadly.

All of this evidence would suggest that the fatality rate might be higher. Maybe not, but that's where evidence is currently pointing at.
And that just considers virulence. The number of deaths depends much more on the transmissibility than the fatality rate.

If you increase transmission by 60%, after 10 generations you get 1.6^10~100x more infections.
Decrease the fatality by 60%, you still get 40x deaths.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tomas Pueyo

Tomas Pueyo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomaspueyo

Sep 24
Massive floods across the Western world. What pattern do you see?

1. Massive floods in Vienna, carrying cars and everything else on its path.
The Danube is mostly embanked, no floodplains
2. Budapest is underwater
The city is also built on the Danube's floodplain. In fact, most of the Danube has embankments, and the floodplains and dams upstream are not enough to absorb all the water
3. Flood disaster in Głuchołazy, Poland, worst one in 100 years. Why? Because the river is fully embanked, has no floodplains anymore, and goes through the middle of the city



Image
Read 12 tweets
Sep 18
If wetlands prevent floods and straight rivers are bad, why do we keep doing it?

Here's why, and how we can do better, along with the most AMAZING visualizations of rivers:Image
What LA did to its river is the worst you can do: A line of concrete devoid of life, replacing nature with brutalist geometry
Image
Image
That's the type of disregard for nature that ends with situations like this one:
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11
One event made these things possible:
Roman civilization
Industrial Revolution
The oil wealth of Arab countries
Russia's invasions
The Mongol Empire
Globalization
Southern Europe richer than Northern Africa
And more

What was it?
The death of an ocean
I'm super excited about this! AFAIK, nobody has put all these facts together. You're learning about it here 1st!

To understand what happened, we need to start in this region of the world. Do you notice something special? Image
1. SEAS
It has plenty of huge inland seas! Notice how we can't find such seas anywhere else in the world*

The Mediterranean, Black, Azov, Caspian, Aral and Red Seas (and the Persian Gulf) are all in the same area, either cut off from oceans or connected by very narrow passes. Image
Read 18 tweets
Sep 8
I've been banging my head on a pbm and I need help, Twitter

Why are there huge dunes on some coasts and not others?

You have dunes like these ones in the Namib desert in Namibia. Why? How do they form? Why only here?

I'll update this thread as I get answers! Image
Apparently strong, dry winds blow from the interior towards the Atlantic ocean, accumulating the sand. As it accumulates, it blows or falls into the ocean, creating these huge slopes. OK.


Image
Image
Image
Image
You can even see these dunes in the satellite
The obvious question becomes: Why just there and not elsewhere on the Namib desert coast? Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 30
Can solar energy costs keep shrinking?
The wealth of humanity and health of the environment are at stake

Solar allies: Costs will keep shrinking!
Skeptics: They're can't! They're already growing!
Who's right?

Here's the story of the biggest energy revolution of the decade:
1. Solar is already the cheapest source of electricity!
It's also one that most ppl love, so few ppl block it—unlike nuclear or fossil fuels

So solar energy is the best candidate to get us cheap energy and with very little CO2 emissions to stop global warming Image
2. There's no such thing as a rich country that consumes little energy. The more energy a country consumes, the richer it is

If we want to be richer, we MUST generate more electricity Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 19
Pumpkins can grow to over 2000 lbs (1 ton) for the same reason the Dutch countryside is purple at night: Because plants are green. Thread 🧵
These pumpkins come from Alaska
Why? Because in the growing season, it gets 20 hours of sunlight
More sunlight, more energy, more growth
Image
Image
They're not the only vegetable to grow so big. Here are Alaskan cabbages. Same principle: 20h of light a day Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(