Year-End Comments from An Independent Analyst (Thread)

1) Buy side does not make sufficient use of external expertise.

I publish research on events, special sits, catalyst-driven situations (which will include fundamentals) on @smartkarma and I note lots of HFs and LOs
(2/n) which do "fundamental" (whether "growth" or "value" biased) ignore the alpha available from special sits. They may not "do risk arb" but when a situation shows up on a portfolio name, they should understand how to best exit/play. They tend to think proprietary info about
(3/n) how/why they got IN for fundamental reasons gives them an edge on the non-predicted special sit. That's wrong.

The entire job of special sits players is to make money because others (those who do not respect the special sit) decide to trade at the "wrong price."
(4/n): 2) Consumers of research (buy side) do not engage DEEPLY enough with external analysts.

What is written is one thing. What can be said is another. Analysts write for a broad constituency making it digestible. There is a LOT more behind if buy side wants. Look for
(5/n) expertise and engage deeply with it. If you do not, you are doing yourself and your investors a disservice.

External research costs a fraction of what it would cost to replicate internally. Period. Some is base level. Some is very specialized. Use it how you can.
(6/n) Investors would do themselves a real favor by figuring out what is available on which they themselves are not domain experts, then figure out the use case for that domain expertise as it applies to their portfolio construction.

EVERY aspect should be considered.
(7/n) Buy side needs to learn that it cannot know everything. There is symbiosis with sell side. Learn how to make best use of what is out there.

Think about the BEST non-monopoly companies you know. How do they interact with their suppliers? Do they trust them?
(8/n) Do they work together to make it work for everyone? Do they expect their suppliers to throw them under the bus? Do they throw their suppliers under the bus?

Buy side is not AMZN.
(9/n) 3) Buy side should understand sell side only wants them to be successful. Symbiosis again.

If buy side active (whether active on Active Share, factor timing, non-linear alpha strats, etc) goes internal to "save costs", it leads to active buy side ruin.
(10/n) 4) Buy side should respect flow and investor behavior more.

Price movement and relative price movement (alpha) comes from flow. Equities do not mark to model. Price change is generated by the marginal demand.

Very few own TSLA at $600+ "because fundamentals"
(11/n): 5) My nearly 25yrs experience in special sits suggests Buy Side should be less religious about holding period.

Buy side tends to buy growth/fundamentals and ignore the reflexive nature of their industry. If you and your peers all own it, who comes next?

That decision
(12/n): is not dependent on time held but on price movement.

6) Most active investors are not active enough. One does not need to write nasty public letters to the board. But one does not have to sell just because someone offers to buy.

And if someone offers to buy and you are
(13/n) willing to sell Stock X at Price Y because someone offered that price, which is above the trading price at announcement, investors should think about what that means for the rest of their portfolio.
(14/n) 7) Buy side should embrace the value of timing and the intersection of their process with the market process itself.

Just because someone looks at a stock now and likes it now does not mean it is the best timing. Someone else looked at it a year ago.
(15/n) The right timing is often due to a catalyst (see where I am going with this?) which triggers a re-assessment for everybody (everybody is reset) which then triggers flow and price change. Understanding how catalysts, timing, the evolution over time, corporate and legal
(16/n) process, market participant obligation (index effect?), etc can all provide the right liquidity/timing.

If you are not an expert at understanding these externalities, find someone who is. Engage with, trust, and learn from them. The same way your investors do with you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Travis Lundy

Travis Lundy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @travislundyasia

28 Dec
Looking Inside the Diaper.

On 30 May 2019, I wrote about Sanyo Chemical (4471 JP) and Nippon Shokubai (4114 JP) as a Guess-The-Ratio trade. I liked both companies, but one wanted to buy Sanyo Chem cheap (1/n)

smartkarma.com/insights/sanyo…
(2/n) I recommended trading the range, buying the 4471/4114 ratio at 0.75 and possibly shorting it at 0.95.
(3/n): The summer passed and Sanyo Chem underperformed despite being cheaper, but as also noted in the first insight, Silchester was building a position in Shokubai. When it got to 0.75 in July 2019, that was time to buy.

Nippon Shokubai downgraded its forecast at end-Jul2019
Read 10 tweets
18 Nov
The Nikkei 225 is a weird and whacky index.

Locally it is sometimes referred to as the "Nikkei Dow" because it is price-weighted, like the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Started many decades ago, the index was started by taking 225 stocks, adding up all the prices, and then
dividing by a DIVISOR to get to the index level on Day 1.

A stock's weight was price divided by the sum.

When one stock is taken out and replaced with another, you change the divisor on that day to make it the same as it would have been had the stock going out remained in.
All this was fine until Japan changed its Companies Act and decided that when a new company was formed, each share had a par value of ¥500 rather than the longtime value of ¥50.

That meant when a stock listed, it had fewer shares outstanding but a higher price. That meant the
Read 22 tweets
16 Nov
Another one really nicely called by Janaghan Jeyakumar @smartkarma. He called for investors to buy Gremz (3150 JP) at ¥1609 or better due to the tachiaigai bunbai event in third week of September. That was <¥1600.

smartkarma.com/insights/topix…
Stock closed today at ¥2161 - 35% higher.

And today we get the TOPIX inclusion announcement. That's 1.4mm shares to buy end-December Image
He has had a string of great calls (great methodology) on Japanese small caps going into TOPIX this year.

You can read more at the link below. Smartkarma is the leading independent institutional investment research platform for Asia.

smartkarma.com/profiles/janag…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!