Theoretical justification arises from the fact that endosomal entry is of only secondary importance for SARS-CoV-2 replication in the respiratory tract.
Both TMPRSS (proteases at the cell membrane) and cathepsins (proteases in endosomes) must be blocked.
Other trials for bromhexine alone, or bromhexine paired with additional TMPRSS inhibitors, also had very good results-- but none quite so impressive as bromhexine+HCQ:
Likewise, nitazoxanide monotherapy actually succeeded in RCT, likely because it has post-entry antiviral effects in addition to its ability to block endosomal entry, but the results were not overwhelming.
Anti-androgenic drugs also induce downregulation of TMPRSS2, albeit seemingly not TMPRSS13 or 11 (or at least, there is no indication of any effect on the latter in available literature).
H+ ionophores: nitazoxanide*, niclosamide*, some vet drugs (ignore)
PIKfyve: apilimod
TPC2: tetrandrine
Cathepsin: teicoplanin, quercetin*
PPIs: weak
* also post-entry
Essentially any safe combination of at least one TMPRSS inhibitor and at least one endosomal entry inhibitor, at a sufficient dose, will confer dual entry inhibition.
Examples:
TMPRSS:
- bromhexine 8-32mg t.i.d.
- ambroxol 15-50+mg t.i.d.
- camostat 200mg t.i.d. (not ideal but cannot go higher)
@HenkPoley This paper indicated that a single exposure to 70% ethanol largely preserved filtration efficacy, comparable to dry heat or UV sanitizing. However, further exposure events gradually worsened filtration efficacy.
People want ironclad proof for everything. It doesn't exist. It never will. Even the best trials only apply to a certain stage of the disease in a certain set of the population at a certain dose with a certain baseline standard of care.
One must weigh evidence and combine signals in a safe way. That is all.
"First, the only certainty is that there is no certainty. Second, every decision, as a consequence, is a matter of weighing probabilities. Third, despite uncertainty we must decide and we must act."
More evidence inflammasome activation predicts severe COVID-19, and acts as a major driver of disease progression.
They release IL-1β, which summons neutrophils and promotes (highly pro-thrombotic) NETosis, plus IL-18, which prompts IFNγ secretion (very inflammatory, apoptotic).
Certain virally infected or antigen-swamped white blood cells smash their emergency self-destruct button, explode, and release huge amounts of signaling molecules that summon exploding neutrophils and tell other classes of WBCs to order nearby cells to die.
This strongly contributes to the severe lung clotting and often serious broader lung tissue damage that define the state we call "severe COVID-19."
@Deadly_Statins it's pretty nasty. the systemic inflammatory response is intense and can hit hard and fast. not a cold or flu at all. not like anything I've ever caught before. glad I was able to abort it.
@Deadly_Statins trying very hard not to catch it again. basically just hiding out in my residence as much as possible.
@Deadly_Statins the percentage of people with active infections out in public right now is obscene; it would be apocalyptic if IFR were higher.
unfortunately because there are so many of them, hospitals are turning people away and IFR *is* getting higher, slowly, inexorably.