Anatomy of a real-time PCR or RT-PCR (PCR or RT-rPCR) curve.
Two things to highlight using these stylised rPCR curves.
First.
The yellow arrows highlight threshold cycles.
These are the "results". The number from the point at which each curve crosses that arbitrary horizontal threshold are recorded by the lab and reported as "detected"
Second.
These values are *not* the same numbers as the TOTAL number of cycles that the rPCR is run for (you can read about cycles here if of interest virologydownunder.com/the-mechanics-…)
So in this version, I've taken away the text and just left the Ct arrows for the 4 detected and a problematic result (bad curve shape, late) that would need further examination (green), and added a red arrow. That arrow marks the TOTAL number of cycles-differs from the Cts, yeah?
Can I just clarify - this is a stylised *example* - it's specific Ct values aren't specifically meaningful or applicable to every run of rPCR ever!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ɪᴀɴ ᴍ. ᴍᴀᴄᴋᴀʏ, ᴘʜᴅ 🦠🤧🧬🥼🦟🧻

ɪᴀɴ ᴍ. ᴍᴀᴄᴋᴀʏ, ᴘʜᴅ 🦠🤧🧬🥼🦟🧻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MackayIM

21 Dec 20
This morning, my early 🎄 present was showing signs of life!
#AussieMushrooms ImageImageImage
And tonight...I'm starting to feel in mildly alarmed Image
Far out! Image
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec 20
That website opinion attack piece on the Corman/Drosten RT-rPCR tests has a few confused & sometimes very wrong comments.
I'll preface this thread with a *presumption* I'm making - these authors haven't worked on or with this test themselves. And that matters a lot if true.
I'm not going through everything but here's one from their "Top10 things I hate about this test" list.
From Number 5. "nor does it contain any other negative controls"
But Corman et al. are actually very clear that negative controls were included.
"all assays were tested 120 times in parallel with water and no other nucleic acid except the provided oligonucleotides. In none of these reactions was any positive signal detected"

But even better, they tested primer specificity on a lot of human viruses, including CoVs: Image
Read 26 tweets
9 Dec 20
Lyssavirus infection confirmed in Far North Queensland as bat-related injuries rise
abc.net.au/news/2020-12-0…
"While ABLV is more likely to be found in a sick or injured bat, bats that appear healthy may also be infectious."
conditions.health.qld.gov.au/HealthConditio….
"In Australia, evidence of ABLV infection has been found in species of flying foxes/fruit bats and insect-eating microbats. It is assumed that any bat in Australia could potentially carry ABLV"
health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/fac…
Read 5 tweets
7 Dec 20
Hey all, if you want a mug like this; a guide.
Check my pinned tweet thread. Near the bottom is a link to my @figshare page where there's an editable .svg (Other images there as well).
I use @inkscape to make & edit .svg files.
Install the font I used (Repirse Script) *first*,
or use your own.
Edit the image to remove the text in the bottom right. Or keep it. Also think about squashing the image a little vertically tighter so it stretches further around mug, horizontally.
Export in a relavent image format (I save as .png format for here & my blog)
Next, find your local mug-making site. I used @Vistaprint but closer to home means faster delivery. Pick a mug colour (find another site if you can't get mug colours!). Place your image as a wraparound using the site's tool. Pay.
Read 4 tweets
7 Dec 20
Recently asked to comment for an end of year 'what we've learned since January' story.
There is no way to do this justice in a few quotes or a short story.
We've learned so much about so many things.
Like the virus, disease, inequities, inequalities, the chaos sown by
misinformation, the driving desire of some to want things to blame & punish, the role of science in leadership, the need for public health institutions to have a greater role in education & authentic communication,
the importance of speed & flexibility in labs, that scientists can also be biased or mean or idiots (=group of humans), from lab test processes aren't widely understood (most of the time no one cares though),
Read 6 tweets
28 Nov 20
COVID-19 testing and correlation with infectious virus, cycle thresholds, and analytical sensitivity cebm.net/study/covid-19… via @cebmoxford
Upfront-how one interprets late PCR results DOES MATTER. No argument. I am very much aware that late Cts mean less RNA (and by extrapolation based on history and experience, less virus) is typically present.
How does that relate to "false positives" & PCR cycle numbers?
A false-positive PCR result typically means that the PCR was positive when no virus had ever been present.
This is different from an infected person's sample not having any *infectious* virus, yet still returning a PCR-positive because of "dead virus"/RNA fragments being shed.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!