Our current system prioritizes corporate profits and the accumulation of vast wealth and power in the hands of a few, whereas I imagine a system that prioritizes people and the planet and which is far more equitable. My imperfect label for the former system is "capitalism."
I think the next big thing in the climate movement will be mainstreaming the idea that we can't come out of climate and ecological breakdown without shifting the goal away from profit & accumulation and toward people & planet. That is, to end "capitalism"
The Green New Deal is an important stepping stone but I think we need to go further - we need to actually change the goal of the entire system. The goal can no longer be profit & massive accumulation & desperate consumption, it needs to be happy humans on a healthy planet.
I want to make it clear that I'm not advocating switching to barter, or living in caves, or not having advanced medical care, or anything like that. I'm simply advocating a shift away from the system goal of profit & accumulation at any cost up to and including a livable planet
The first step is to somehow reclaim our captured political system so that we can start implementing common-sense stuff like ending money in politics, lobbying, and fossil fuel subsidies; and implementing electoral reform, districting reform, taxes on the super rich, etc.
And then we start building, and changing, and looking beyond GDP, and healing, and implementing policies that put people and the planet first and that force corporations to serve the public good, not shareholders and CEOs. It's not rocket science
We also need to take a hard look at banking, interest lending, and debt. Banking needs to serve the public good and it cannot be "for profit," that's a powder keg. The whole system spirals out of control when private bankers have that much power to accumulate capital.
Eventually we craft a new economic system that doesn't rely on unending exponential growth (which as a physicist I can tell you is unsustainable no matter how you spin it) but instead distributes work and resources in an equitable way within planetary bounds

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Kalmus

Peter Kalmus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateHuman

22 Dec 20
Here are a few of the most impactful climate books I've read. First up: "Less is More" by @jasonhickel. Yes, we CAN organize society around human thriving instead of further enriching billionaires. Yes, we DO need to deal w growthism to stop climate and ecological breakdown.
Next, "Braiding Sweetgrass" by Robin Wall Kimmerer. Such a tour de force melding of science, indigenous wisdom, and poetry. I dare you to read it without crying. Especially the elders as last living remnants of their mother tongues, and how language is so much more than language.
"Merchants of Doubt" by @NaomiOreskes and @ErikMConway (who happens to be a colleague of mine at the space lab). The classic exposé of the evil scholars who create confusion and delay in support of deadly corporate malfeasance with their lies. Yes, evil.
Read 7 tweets
7 Dec 20
Why is hunger skyrocketing, when almost half of food produced is thrown into landfills and the stock market is soaring?
Why is it so hard to get healthcare for all, even during a pandemic, even when the policy is so popular? Why is healthcare still tied to employment? Certainly, industry profits and money in politics. But it's even deeper.
Those who control the capital seek to create scarcity - or rather, the illusion of scarcity, by artificially preventing access - so as to force the workers into what amounts to wage slavery and drive exponential growth, which is also destroying the Earth's living systems.
Read 7 tweets
10 Oct 20
We need a billion climate activists. No one can tell you how to be a climate activist; that's up to you to figure out. But here are a few suggestions.
First, find a local group of activists to join - or better yet, two or three. You need to find your people: people who share a similar set of goals as you, people you like and who are working toward something you believe in.
These activists will become your friends and co-conspirators. Logistically and emotionally, climate activism is too hard to do alone. You need support, and your voice will be more powerful when joined with your group.
Read 11 tweets
7 Sep 20
Two basic concepts in climate I want the public to know:

1 Trend. If something gets worse every day, after some time it becomes unbearable and systems break.

2 Irreversibility. Humans can't "clean up" climate breakdown or ecosystem and biodiversity loss.
That we're on an escalator should be very obvious, but I still see articles on "navigating change" and the phrase "new normal" pop up enough that I'm not sure it is. Even prominent scientists until recently used the phrase "new normal," probably because it makes a good soundbite.
Until we stop the drivers of the escalator, it will keep taking us up into hotter and hotter temperatures, which are driving all the awful impacts we're seeing. The main driver is simple: extracting and burning fossil fuel. Animal agriculture is a major contributor (~15%) as well
Read 6 tweets
3 Sep 20
Today's LA Times has two articles about the extreme heat this weekend, and neither so much as mentions climate change. But both came with beach photos (one in today's print edition only) similar to this.

latimes.com/california/sto…

latimes.com/california/sto…
We're very late in the climate emergency. Every article about a climate-related impact should:
1. mention climate change
2. address how climate influences this impact
3. address future projections of this impact

To not do so seems journalistically dishonest to me.
Maybe the authors @LukeMMoney and @CartoonKahuna could weigh in.

Why did you choose not to mention climate, let alone address how climate influences heat waves and how they will worsen in coming years and decades? Did you think it was irrelevant? Is it editorial policy?
Read 5 tweets
30 Aug 20
I'm excited about the People's Convention in a few hours, and I'm honored to be speaking. I want to explain why I support creating a People's Party as we live through warp-speed climate and ecological breakdown. @4aPeoplesParty
peoplesconvention.org
Let me start by saying I think it's crucial to vote Trump out. He's pushing us toward civil war. And building the climate justice movement through direct action would be nearly impossible under climate-denying fascist rule, a risk under a 2nd term of Trump. Vote your conscience.
The People's Party is no threat on Nov 3. We're going to do everything we can to build up the party, and be a force in 2022 and 2024, both by running candidates at all levels and by challenging the DNC from the left. But that doesn't affect Nov. 3. Vote your conscience.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!