Is there desire for us here to broadly explain and interpret the "Brexit" deal? Even in general terms it would be of some length.
We’ll now try to sum up main points of the “Brexit” agreement. Keep in mind, please, that space is limited and the agreement is new.
First, it is a deal, that is the opposite of no deal, which would have had instant, catastrophic consequences. The wound is serious. Now we need to see how stitches work. Healing, such as it is, will be slow, and the patient will be permanently changed, if not totally weakened.
There has been a decent compromise on the “level playing field.” Britain can claim sovereignty, and Europe has reasonably protected the single market. At the moment, Britain has access to the European market without tariffs.
Britain has agreed to set up a non-governmental body to administer state aid to business. Its decisions are reviewable by British courts. If either side judges the field out of whack, it can impose tariffs.
This feature, reviewable after four years, broke the deadlock in talks but could easily disintegrate into trade war. EU environmental, labor, and human rights regulations remain in place.
The European Court of Justice is mostly but not entirely removed from the relationship. They will hear matters regarding Northern Ireland. Even so, it’s far from the British opening position, which was no tethers to Europe at all.
British rights are significantly reduced. There is no right to live and work in Europe. British are allowed into Europe for 90 of 180 days. Short-term work travel is allowed. Sponsored British can live and work in Europe for up to a year, but without their families.
There is no automatic recognition of professional qualifications or conformity assessment, no shared financial regulation, etc. There is an attempt under way to let banks trade as if still in Europe, which makes one wonder what the hell’s the point?
Fishermen are furious. Their European counterparts can work six miles from the British coast, and the loss of “quota swapping” – trading unwanted catch with European counterparts – threatens to destroy much of the British industry.
On the whole it is a temporary treaty of severance, rather than a new dawn, because there is now high-friction trade between Britain (home rules) and Northern Ireland (EU rules). That can’t last forever.
Britain retains an interest in the single market through Northern Ireland, but will find it holds no influence in Brussels over single market legislation.
Scotland will leave the Union at the earliest chance.
The agreement is a basis for further negotiations and uncertainty long into the future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard M. Nixon

Richard M. Nixon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dick_nixon

3 Jan
Bonds and Clemens were going to the Hall of Fame before the fall, as it were. That should end it. But you need to acknowledge they were the faces of a deep problem. Not just by their fame, but by their actions. The stonewalling. The game is worse for their behavior.
Schilling is to me a different case. He is by the standards I've always held very good, not great. But the Hall of Fame has opened the door to those players. Even so, that he has no friends is his problem. His play is not compelling enough to override that.
Schilling is also an example of a dumb trend in modern Hall of Fame voting: a well-known playoff game living too large in memory.
Read 4 tweets
2 Jan
An airplane, for instance, is a beautiful machine. Operated competently and in good faith it will almost never hurt people. You follow?
What I think the Democrats have yet to learn is that though they have an edge on policy, probably, we're past the point where policy counts. More than ever politics is about societal control. That is why people vote against interest.
If the Democrats have a hope in hell they have to be the square party now. Money in your pocket, the rule of law, a normal life.
Read 4 tweets
28 Dec 20
The word "shall" in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 makes this a lie.
You know, this is not a difference of opinion or open to interpretation or a matter of being misinformed. It's a lie.
Someone wrote to say the meaning of "shall" is debatable in law. That's true. But in context of Article II, Section 1 there is no debate. Did the Founders, who took every pain to vest responsibility for elections in the States, intend the Vice President to have ultimate power?
Read 5 tweets
14 Dec 20
If you want to know who's running things over there, London is about to go into strict lockdown. But in any case the rules will be lifted December 23-27 because, well, Pickwick and Cratchit and oranges around the fire. I don't know.
This has changed to a strict lockdown covering London and "much of the south and east," whatever that means. Households outside this area can now mix with other households on Christmas Day only.
When "Brexit" goes to hell, and it will, soon, the parliamentary party will fast put Johnson in a gibbet and all that Churchill garbage, which not even his allies really believe, will go up in smoke forever.
Read 5 tweets
23 Oct 20
The House of Commons this week voted down providing free school meals to children during the Christmas break. Local councils are now stepping in, spurred by the footballer Marcus Rashford, who shamed the government into acting once already.
Kensington & Chelsea Tories breaking with the national party is like Bob Dole breaking with the Republican National Committee.
Rashford is a better politician than anyone currently in power there. He's young, black, grew up poor, and fearless.
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct 20
Nothing changed. Trump spoke English, as he sometimes does, and did a reasonable job of hitting his marks. And that’s all it was—his marks. His relative fluency will make for horse race-type speculation but he only repeated what he’s done for six months and more.
Biden was sharper than the town hall, and as I said, did a good job of knowing when to talk to the camera for brass tacks: “You’re poor, you’re sick, I’m here for you.” It sounds simplistic but he was for the popular things and spoke of them in reasonable detail.
Trump sneering at Biden when he talked of the kitchen table will come back again.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!