As the transition period ends, the #BrexitDeal applies from tomorrow. But there's also a parallel significant legal change - most of the rest of the withdrawal agreement starts to apply. A thread on the legal issues in the rest of that agreement.
The citizens' rights provisions of the withdrawal agreement (on EU citizens who moved to the UK, and UK citizens who moved to the EU, before the end of the transition period) start to apply.
After today, UK citizens newly moving to the EU, or EU citizens newly moving to the UK, are in principle governed by national law (partly harmonised by the EU, on the EU side).
However, the #BrexitDeal contains some provisions on visas for service providers.
The #BrexitDeal also refers to the matching unilateral decisions of the EU and UK to waive a visa requirement for short tourist visits. Analysis of the EU law on that issue here: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/04/travel…
UK citizens resident in the EU on the basis of the withdrawal agreement (or who move to EU in future) should be covered by the EU law on long-term resident non-EU citizens, which provides for a limited form of mobility between Member States. Analysis here: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/12/uk-cit…
Next, a big chunk of the treaty on 'separation provisions' - ie what happens to pending European Arrest Warrants - starts to apply. For a number of issues (for instance, trade in goods and extradition) the #BrexitDeal will start to apply to any new transactions, requests etc.
The financial contributions part of the withdrawal agreement - which already applied during the transition period (ie the UK has already made a chunk of the contributions it provides for) - continues to apply as regards remaining contributions.
What if the EU and UK argue about this agreement? In place of the full jurisdiction of the CJEU, the arbitration rules in the withdrawal agreement start to apply. Some limited jurisdiction of the CJEU continues.
Note that issues of breach and termination are quite different in the #BrexitDeal, but they are separate treaties, ie ending the latter doesn't end the WA.
But for both the withdrawal agreement and the 'Brexit deal' there's a common misunderstanding that breaching the treaty automatically leads to its termination. That's incorrect as regards both treaties (and as regards international treaties in general).
Finally, the withdrawal agreement protocols. The protocol on Cypriot bases starts to apply; the protocol on Gibraltar mostly ends (we'll see if anything is agreed to replace it).
The NI protocol mostly starts: remember it's been supplemented by implementing measures this month.
This version cuts out the bit at the end which says Vote Leave promises were kept (*waves to EU citizens*) and Theresa May was a disaster. Hope someone screenshot it?
Here's part of what's left, re legal services...presumably "improve" isn't a comparison to the status quo...
Missed this one - recent judgment of the EU General Court on whether a UK official who obtained Belgian citizenship in order to keep job with EU institutions was still entitled to an "expatriation allowance" despite usual rule - curia.europa.eu/juris/document…
2/ The General Court rejected the staff member's arguments - but he's already appealed to the CJEU.
The main argument re Brexit is at paras 54-73 - ie taking out Belgian nationality (and therefore losing the allowance) was a 'force majeure' for the staff member. Court says no.
3/ This paragraph sets out a striking principle which would be relevant outside the scope of staff cases - especially to UK citizens in EU/EU citizens in UK.
His argument by analogy based on free movement law cases and dual citizenship also failed.
New ruling - appeal of UK citizen seeking to retain EU citizenship rejected on standing grounds: curia.europa.eu/juris/document…
However:
- this was a request for interim measures; the main case is still pending
- two other cases directly against EU are pending
2/ - all three cases likely to face standing issues
- but a fourth case sent from the French courts to the CJEU will *not* face standing issues, ie the Court in principle has to answer the national court's questions about whether UK citizens have lost EU citizenship
3/ I've updated my collection of links to Brexit litigation, including the latest developments on "loss of EU citizenship" cases, plus the internal market bill - eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/p/litigating-b…