1/ Trumpism is not about ideas. It’s a politic of grievance, which grafts policy onto disaffection as an afterthought. This is why we can’t defeat it with policy proposals or logical appeals to supposed self interest. Trumpers aren’t motivated by these things, but by rage alone..
2/ This is the most fascist thing about Trumpism: its lack of coherent ideology. That vacuum is what makes it possible for a fascistic cult of personality to thrive, and the notion of an autocrat motivated by grudges and the desire to dominate for domination’s sake to flourish...
3/ It’s not even necessarily a conscious fascist politic but a fascism that derives from the base’s “nothing matters” mentality...the idea that owning the libs, making liberals cry, or hurting one’s perceived race, ethnic, religious, gender and sexual enemies is everything...
4/ Any attempt to defeat this through normal means — “oh here, look, here’s our great plan for health care and affordable college and blah blah blah,” or “look, the problem is really the rich” (who they clearly don’t hate, thus their love for Trump) — will fail to move them...
5/ It is time to abandon the idea of flipping these people. Time to focus on two things: rallying/motivating those who are clearly opposed to Trumpism to stand up and overwhelm Trumpists, and to inoculate younger and newer folks to politics against the right...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Wanting M4A is righteous & correct. Forcing the vote bc 'people are dying & can't wait' is empty rhetoric bc every rational person knows it won't pass. Doesn't mean forcing the vote is wrong but supporting it as if it will stop even 1 person from dying is grossly dishonest...
2/ The only other arguments I hear are essentially: a) this way we can figure out which Dems to primary (i.e., the ones who won't support M4A) and b) "we've tried it the patient way and it hasn't worked, so fuck it!" Let's look at these in reverse order...
3/ The "we've tried it your way" argument is vapid bullshit. First, the people saying that rarely have tried anything. They scream on Twitter & YouTube. They aren't organizers. They haven't run for office to try it that way. They're just pissed (rightly) and think rage = change..
1/ Some people on the left have this magical thinking problem when it comes to why our ideas don't often carry the day within the Dem Party. We act like it's all "big Pharma money" etc. And yes, that money is corrupting. But it's not magic...
2/ If a Rep knew the majority of THEIR constituents (not Dem voters from other parts of the country but THEIR constituents) supported more left policies *and would actually show up & vote against them if they didn't vote for those policies* they would vote for them, obviously.
3/ A major goal of a Rep is to keep being one, so no one would go against the wishes of the majority of their constituents just to get contributions, if that would cost them the job. But it WON'T. Either bc the folks who could punish them don't bother to vote, or, more likely...
THREAD: The loss of 1 in 1k Americans (including about 175k white ones) due to COVID & the pandemic's economic devastation are both the collateral damage of anti-Black and brown racism. Sound hyperbolic? It's not, and it's easily proved. Please follow along...
2/ On the one hand, sure, the Administration's nonchalance in the face of the virus is the initial cause of the devastation. And that had been evident since January. But that was actually starting to shift a bit by late March, right up to April 7. What happened then?...
3/ As @Thom_Hartmann has noted, that day the NYT & WaPo (among others) reported that the disproportionate death toll of COVID was among Black & brown folks. THAT NIGHT, Tucker Carlson (who had actually been taking C19 seriously) changed his tune. A few days later so did Trump...
A few thoughts about the Nashville bombing and how folks are reacting to it. On the one hand, yes, were the bomber Arab and/or Muslim, the "sad loner" narrative would have been eclipsed by talk of possible religious/ideological motives and the label "terrorist." That said...
2/ the fact that we'd affix that label to others doesn't make it proper to call this bomber a terrorist. The answer is to STOP affixing that label in cases where it clearly does not fit. Allow that everyone can have motives for awful shit that aren't linked to their identities...
3/ So in the case of Muslims, they can just be loners, w/mental illness & personal grudges or who want to commit suicide for the same reason others do: reasons that are personal not ideological. And white guys can do evil shit and not have it be about white nationalism or Trump..
1/ Conspiracy theories are for those who don't understand how systems function, so they cling to the idea of evil forces behind the scenes, when in fact, most awful things that happen happen because the social structures within which we operate contribute to various outcomes...
2/ Sadly, American culture is so hyper-individualistic, it is easier to think of everything (good and bad) as flowing from either good or bad people, rather than social systems and structures that are far more complex...
3/ And unfortunately our schools don't really teach systemic thinking, or encourage people to have a sociological imagination. So it's easier to blame false flags and a "pending gun grab" for mass shootings, rather than look at the mental health system or violent culture...
The worst takes on the Nashville bombing remind us how awful some people can be..
"Nashville's run by Democrats!"
???
Who was Mayor of NY when 9/11 happened? Oh yeah.
Bombings happen in cities bc it gets more attention than bombing a barn, dumbass...
2/ Or how about...
"The bomb exploded outside the AT&T data center" (true)...
"And that's because they had data proving the election was stolen" (and there's the shark...make sure to jump)...
To be clear it also exploded right outside the Melting Pot, so...
3/ Or "it was antifa or BLM"...neither of which have ever bombed anything, anywhere, even once, as opposed to right wingers (who may not have done this either -- it might not have been ideological per se), but who have done literally dozens of bombings in the past 25 years...