Democrats — including numerous Dem Party-aligned journalists — have spent all day smearing 2 Politico reporters as misogynistic because they had the sexist audacity to report on the very lucrative relationship between Janet Yellen & Wall St., the industry she’s about to regulate:
There are so many remarkably dumb and bad faith components to this accusation, beginning with their central claim — that only women (like Yellen & Hillary) have their Wall St largesse scrutinized when they’re about to assume large amounts of political power. Here’s 2 examples:
What’s wrong with this misogyny accusation? Everything.

The most glaring and inexcusable: their smear relies on the assertion that only women get this kind of media scrutiny even though **the very same article** extensively scrutinizes the Wall St ties of Antony Blinken, a man.
How can they accduse 2 reporters of not examining Wall St. ties of powerful men when they did *exactly that*?

Because Dems are the Party of Wall St. They put people in charge of industries who have been enriched by them.

If you point it out, they’ll try to wreck your reputation
Anyone with the most minimal good faith would instantly see why it’s vital to know how Wall St. has purposely enriched those they know are likely soon to be regulating them. That’s why the Wall St payments of Larry Summers (a man) were always reported:

reuters.com/article/summer…
The Dems are a neoliberal party which serves Wall St & corporate power. They are overwhelmingly led by extremely rich people who serve these power centers.

Touting diversity is how they try to hide that, and bad faith bigotry accusations are how they punish those who report it.
If you’re embarrassed that your party just put in charge of the Treasury Dept someone who got wildly rich by collecting $250k checks from Wall St for 1 hour of “work,” then pressure your party to change.

Don’t exploit misogyny smears to try to deter reporters from revealing it.
Happy New Year!
Right on cue, the daughter of Nancy Pelosi — one of the richest members in Congress — smears reporters as misogynists for the crime of reporting on the obscene enrichment of Biden’s Treasury Secretary by Wall St right before she took that position.

This is the Democratic Party:
Saddened to see that Politico's misogyny has metastasized to NYT, now reporting on Janet Yellen's millions in speech fees "over the past two years from major corporations and Wall Street banks that have a keen interest in the financial policies she will oversee."

Do better, NYT.
Like Politico, the same misogynistic NYT article also includes extensive scrutiny over the massive paydays received by Antony Blinken, a man, from corporations he'll be able to influence as Secretary of State.

But whatever.

nytimes.com/2021/01/01/us/…
When our Democratic Party leaders exit the revolving door, pick up millions in checks for an hour of work from the banks and companies they just gone done regulating, on their way back through the revolving door to regulate them again, we should applaud their money-making talent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

3 Jan
A decision will be issued tomorrow by the lower-court British judge in the Assange extradition case. It's virtually certain that Judge Vanessa Baraitser -- who has been openly hostile to Assange, barely even pretending to extend basic due process -- will rule for the USG. But...
On some level, it doesn't matter who wins tomorrow. Either way, Assange stays in prison: if he wins, the USG appeals, and if the US wins, Assange appeals.

That means the US & UK get to disappear Assange *for years* without proving his guilt: just refuse to release him on bail.
The indifference, if not outright support, of most of the US media for the Trump DOJ's attempt to extradite and prosecute Assange -- despite the grave threats it poses to their own press freedom -- is repellent but predictable. I explained here this week:

greenwald.substack.com/p/the-kafkaesq…
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
This is honestly one of the most hilarious mega-viral tweets I've ever seen on Twitter.

As an undercover CIA operative, @HurdOnTheHill "saw firsthand how our enemies" -- who? "our enemies" -- "steal elections and try to interfere in ours." That's what he saw at CIA.

😂😂😂

🇺🇸
The major reason that tweet from Rep. Hurd went so viral is it's a GOP politician condemning claims of voter fraud.

But a subsidiary reason is that Americans love to hear how it's **other countries** -- the Bad Ones -- that "steal elections and interfere" in others' politics. 🇺🇸
Sorry, just have to repeat this in what I'm sure is a futile effort to get it out of my system and stop laughing so I can do other things today:

"When I was undercover at the CIA, I saw firsthand how our enemies steal elections and try to interfere in ours."
Read 4 tweets
31 Dec 20
The Kafkaesque Imprisonment of Julian Assange Exposes U.S. Myths About Freedom and Tyranny

greenwald.substack.com/p/the-kafkaesq…
"The real measure of how free is a society is not how its mainstream, well-behaved ruling class servants are treated, but the fate of its actual dissidents....Royal court vassals always end up fine: rewarded for their subservience and thus convinced that freedoms abound."
How you determine whether a society is *truly* free, whether it truly guarantees basic civic rights and civil liberties -- or whether it's just an illusory tool of propaganda:
Read 6 tweets
30 Dec 20
The smug football-spiking glee over Luke Letlow's death at 41 is one of the most repulsive things I've seen on this site.

Celebrating death is repugnant in all cases but he wasn't a COVID denier. Urging that the costs of isolation & economic ruin be considered isn't denialism:
Many deaths are caused by careless choices: people don't eat well; they don't exercise; they smoke, drink or take drugs; they don't have safe sex; they drive when tired.

But we still mourn their deaths as tragic, not giggle that they got what they deserved -- except sociopaths.
A top Biden WH aide, Rep. Cedric Richmond, just tested positive for COVID after he traveled to an Atlanta political rally for Ossoff and Warnock, rather than staying isolated at home. Do you think that's karmic justice, that if he dies it's just deserts?

ca.news.yahoo.com/biden-adviser-…
Read 4 tweets
28 Dec 20
For media outlets whose profit model depended on scaring people daily about Trump and are now petrified about how they'll keep people hooked - and they're are worried - this is what they're going to do: elevate the threat of right-wing domestic terrorism to keep fear levels high:
Defining everyone engaged in activism against Biden/Harris or who otherwise remains loyal to Trump as a "domestic terrorist" won't only be a desperate ploy to keep people scared and thus watching/reading, but will also be the pretext for FBI aggression, online censorship, etc.
Just as in Bush/Obama years - when FBI would coerce people to be informants and infiltrate mosques to induce some desperate/unstable Muslim kid to agree to a plot FBI created, then arrest them & praise themselves - they'll target white meth heads in Idaho & inflate that threat.
Read 4 tweets
28 Dec 20
Good @benyt look at the amazing success on Substack of Heather Cox Richardson, a History Professor who has attracted a massive audience with restrained, daily anti-Trump columns. Even I'm tired of reading about Substack but it has some good/happy points:

nytimes.com/2020/12/27/bus…
First, Ben says his "conservative" estimate is her Substack is generating "more than a million dollars a year."

I'll guarantee it's *way* more: for sure closer to $1.5m & probably closer to $2m. This is good news for independent journalism: this success proves this model works:
Consider: people despise the mainstream corporate media so much (validly) that they're willing to pay to support anything that diverges from it, journalism that offers anything unique. Rogan proves this, too. That's why there are so many media attacks on Substack (and Rogan).
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!