THREAD: An open letter to @pritipatel
A group of claimants has written to the Home Sec today expressing no confidence in her or @ukhomeoffice to administer the Windrush Compensation Scheme or dismantle the hostile environment. [1/19] independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
In the 3 years since the Windrush Scandal broke, it has become clear that the constituency of victims is substantial. @ukhomeoffice has admitted to stakeholders that a further assessment exercise is required to get a handle on the number of claimants. [3/19]
It is now January 2021 - 29 months have passed since @sajidjavid, then Home Secretary, announced there would be a compensation scheme. [4/19] theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Twenty months have passed since the Scheme was launched by his successor and minister-most-likely-to-name-Caligula-as-dream-dinner-party-guest @pritipatel. [5/19] gov.uk/government/new…
At least 20 victims - very likely many more, because this isn't a constituency well plugged into the internet and social media, so there are likely many victims we just don't know about - have died without seeing compensation or an apology. 👇🏾 [6/19]
This is an ex-gratia scheme. There has been no hold-up waiting for a law to be drafted, passed or amended; the Home Secretary has always had full discretion and power to revisit the Scheme Rules and make amendments. [7/19] commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief…
To put that another way, @ukhomeoffice took 9 months to come up with this turkey, and has had 20 months since to fix it - 20 months during which it has been the beneficiary of countless representations from experts and victims. [8/19]
We now know that in that period, even the Scheme architect, Martin Forde QC, provided feedback and attempted to correct some of the more major injustices in the Scheme Rules, such as the rule on criminality allowing @ukhomeoffice to reduce awards by up to 50%. [9/19]
Sidebar: it is clear that @pritipatel has a double-punishment fetish, as seen most recently in her bid to reduce the term of custody triggering deportation from 12 to 6 months. Especially of Jamaicans, for some known reason. [10/19]
Twenty months, WITH input from experts, WITH evidence from claimants that they are being re-traumatised, WITH the Scheme architect trying to steer @ukhomeoffice right, has resulted in this tepid set of half-measures @pritipatel calls an overhaul. [11/19] gov.uk/government/new…
And wouldn't you know it - those "fast-tracked" £10k payments, which were supposed to be rolled out beginning in the week of 14 December, have failed to materialise. Here's the Pritster telling Commons in December that they would start immediately: [12/19]
The HO either doesn't know how to fix the Scheme, or refuses to do so. There is no political will to make amends to Windrushers; the @Conservatives are more interested in medieval double-punishment laws, tipping over refugees at sea and demonising Black Lives Matter. [13/19]
At the *bare minimum*, a bona fide appeal mechanism would allow scrutiny of case decisions. But the Scheme was set up allowing @ukhomeoffice to mark its own homework at first instance, then pass it up to a friendly government-appointed body at the second stage. [14/19]
This is despite the fact that at least one independent body - the @PHSOmbudsman - wanted to be involved, and was utterly dismayed to be excluded from the process. [15/19]
Enough is enough. There isn't time for @ukhomeoffice to scrape up the energy to look at the evidence it is given, dawdle over using it for months on end, then tinker feebly at the edges. There isn't time to wait for @pritipatel to sprout a human offshoot with a soul. [16/19]
The Windrush Compensation Scheme must be taken away from @ukhomeoffice and placed in the care of an independent external body immediately. Victims and claimants simply don't see any other viable alternative, and they'd like for this to be over within their lifetimes. [17/19]
If you care *at all* about a functioning democracy in which government is held to account for its malfeasances, and where Black and minority ethnic citizens are treated with equal respect and dignity, you NEED to know about this, and to help us do something about it. [18/19]
Yesterday, we got hold of this Deportation and Charter Flights Factsheet, dated Thursday. It concerns the planned removals of the #Jamaica50 scheduled for next Wednesday, 2 Dec. It’s not on the @ukhomeoffice website. [1/30] scribd.com/document/48608…
We contacted them to establish if it was legitimate. They said the doc “did come from the Home Office”, but “hasn’t been uploaded to gov.uk yet”, and was “provided to a number of stakeholders” following requests for information on the planned deportations. [2/30]
It struck us as odd that a doc of clear public interest, setting out the HO’s position on a wildly controversial matter, and providing a few mildly exonerating tidbits at that, wouldn’t be made publicly available. (There are now 2 working days left to the deadline.) [3/30]
This is @ukhomeoffice's factsheet in response to the planned removals on 2 December. Not entirely clear why it hasn't been published on gov.uk, but it is genuine and its provenance has been confirmed. Some thoughts: [1/10] #Jamaica50 scribd.com/document/48608…
Firstly, it's sneaky, not to mention suspicious, to not make a document like this publicly available asap, when it's clearly a matter of public interest, and the event in question is fewer than 3 working days away. Just a gripe, but. [2/10]
S 32(5) of the UK Borders Act 2007 does compel the Secretary of State to make a deportation order when a person meets the conditions in either of s 32(2) or (3); in (very) short, if they've had a sentence of at least 12 months, or it's a serious crime. [3/10]
In the past 10 days, the @ukhomeoffice has:
(i) arranged deportations to Jamaica (cf Feb 2020) in the middle of a pandemic, where some detainees will not have had any family contact before deportation, on unknown legal grounds (yes, b/c really, can they be trusted?) [1/6]
(ii) had a whistleblower - senior ex-official @cheamfields (Alex Ankrah) expose jaw-dropping racism within its ranks that conclusively disqualifies it from having control of ANYTHING intended to “right the wrongs” committed upon Windrushers; [2/6] theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/n…
(iii) had its head, @pritipatel, pretty deafeningly un-exonerated of a campaign of bullying so toxic a mandarin on a £190k salary is pursuing an ET action that won’t net anywhere *near* that instead of taking a settlement out of rage/spite; [3/6] google.co.uk/amp/s/www.busi…
On the heels of yday’s revelations from @cheamfields re racism in the Home Office, here is an **old article** by a senior member of the government’s Windrush Cross Government Working Group. This person was vetted (presumably) and appointed [1/11]
to this post, in which he is expected to advocate FOR Windrush victims and facilitate justice for them, by @ukhomeoffice. [2/11]
To be clear, we don’t know if Bishop Aldred would still stand by all of the views expressed in this post, which dates to June 2018. But some of the views expressed here are not of the type likely to change. For example: [3/11]
There were distressing reports yesterday that chartered deportation flights to Jamaica are being resumed, with one scheduled for 2 Dec. Aspects of these removals have been deemed unlawful by the Court of Appeal. [1/13] independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
It is unclear whether deportations are being carried out lawfully at present, but we're not bursting with confidence that they are, to put it mildly, given the revelations of the past few days. [2/13] theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/n…
What *is* clear is that we now have parallel seams of human rights abuses being perpetrated simultaneously against Black and brown people, largely of limited economic means - the #WindrushScandal, which relates to deprivation of UK residency/citizenship and documentation; [4/13]
In the pvt sector, turning up to a board meeting this poorly briefed wld be unprofessional at least and sackable at worst. @MatthewRycroft1 and his @ukhomeoffice colleagues didn't have basic numbers (which are published) or facts, and didn't seem embarrassed about it. [2/12]
It wasn't just us, biased as we obviously are, who thought that. @Meg_HillierMP and @YvetteCooperMP wrote to the Home Office shortly after, requesting all the data and clarifications that couldn't be given at the session.