@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 oh, you are absolutely right that falling housing prices would be extraordinarily disruptive, would break a lot of families’ (and investors’ and banks’) finances. that we’ve allowed this to emerge is precisely the problem. 1/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 to become richer as a society, we want the price of housing, including high quality, desirable amenity housing, to fall. 2/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 but we’ve created institutional arrangements under which increasing overall wealth in that very important way is financially and so politically intolerable to the more affluent part of our society, whose wealth is largely concentrated in homes. 3/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 the effect of that is to cause the most politically enfranchised section of the country to oppose policies that would make us richer over all, because it would have miserable effects on their own circumstances. 4/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 these institutional choices basically cement a kind of predation: homeowners, not from malice but because they don’t want to be broke, demand policy that supports housing prices, that ensures housing is scarce, that means we are poorer overall and many of us are homeless. 5/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 we’ve created a conflict of between increasing overall wealth and the financial well-being of the incumbent upper-middle class. so we destroy and forego tremendous real wealth, keep good housing scarce, consign much of the country to misery. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Randy Waldman

Steve Randy Waldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @interfluidity

7 Dec 20
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray There is often a strong tension between quality standards for individual pieces and quality of conversation. Imposing high quality standards at an individual piece level restricts participation, both between and within writers. 1/
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray Within a writer, more good might come from publishing weak pieces with "half-baked" ideas that others can elaborate upon than imposing a high bar on her own writing's quality. 2/
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray Between writers, if the standard for participation in a conversation is the beautiful craftsmanship that good editing can help to deliver, those who aren't institutionally placed to have such editing will be excluded, along with the contributions they might furnish. 3/
Read 5 tweets
8 Nov 20
How much turns on the Georgia runoffs?

A thread.
1. Control of the Senate, and thereby the full legislative branch of the United States government, for now.
2. The capacity to reform a judiciary "Constitutionally hardballed" with tremendous hypocrisy into a decades-long supermajority of Republican appointees at its highest level.
Read 5 tweets
29 Oct 20
i am very torn about this stuff, but the issue i don't think @ggreenwald addresses is that leaks themselves constitute a form of selective editing, and an "in the public interest standard" has to consider that, even regarding authentic material. 1/ greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-j…
if (not saying this is the case here and now, but if) one political faction is much more capable of unearthing competitors' private materials than others, when is it in the public interest to cover even the authentic material released? 2/
records of private, "candid" conversations will include things that would be discreditable in a public context, even when actions ultimately taken may be innocent. 3/
Read 10 tweets
27 Oct 20
people think of nationalization as more radical, more dangerous, than regulation, but for deeply regulated industries that may be misguided. 1/
like nationalization, regulation usurps control. but often clumsily. pervasive regulation blurs lines of accountability, public actors point fingers at private "owners", and vice versa. 2/
obviously it depends on the nature and pervasiveness of the regulation. for industries in which private actors are numerous and diverse in how they behave, where regulation imposes just shared limits and requirements, this is argument doesn't hold. think restaurants. 3/
Read 6 tweets
25 Sep 20
Listening to the conversation between @csissoko and @DavidBeckworth on the evolution of banking and money markets, which is of course amazing. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mac…

Some highlights for me: 1/
@csissoko points out the obvious-once-you-think-about-it fact that in a world where institutional money is collateralized, borrowed liquidity (i.e. repo), a change in interest rates amounts to a sharp change in the quantitative money supply… 2/
and immediate in that it does not depend on a reequilibration of investment decisions, which would unfold over time, that is implicit in imagined "hurdle rate" channels. (Interest rate rises, equivalently bond price drops, mechanically destroy collateral value.) 3/
Read 18 tweets
20 Sep 20
One of the more interesting and nuanced calls for devolution to address bitter US political divides, by @RajaKorman. 1/
I don't see those divides as purely or even mostly geographic. (In fact, I see them largely as artifacts of the incentives that govern the political parties who n turn reshape our politics and our selves, qua @leedrutman isbn.nu/0190913851) 2/
So I'm skeptical of devolution as a solution to our deadlocked bitterness. If we became several fully independent nations that kept our current electoral system, we'd soon all become little UKs, bitterly divided within while also scapegoating greater America like an EU. 3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!