You're hearing a lot of talk about "irregularities" in the election of 1876 that led to a "disputed" outcome. What is being referred to in this hazy terms?
Across the state of South Carolina, white conservatives had used terror and massacre to deter former slaves from voting in 1876. Here's the story of an attack upon the small town of Hamburg in July blackpast.org/african-americ…
Hundreds of black South Carolinians were killed by white conservative militias. Blacks fought back in many places, but they were out-gunned.

The killings were not spontaneous outbursts. They were part of planned campaign of anti-black voter suppression.

ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/…
Some of the elements of the conservative plan to suppress black votes in South Carolina in 1876 sound queasily familiar in our own time, adjusting for the antique language and technology.
But back of it all was terror and violence, more violence than could be contained by the limited federal forces in the area - who were anyway constrained by the white conservative Democratic House majority elected in 1874.
The terror and violence worked. States where large black populations had formerly cast ballots were "redeemed" for the conservative cause - and for the presidential nominee of the racial conservatives, the Democrat, Samuel Tilden.
In the face of this campaign of terrorism, the two national parties struck a deal. The Republicans would accept the validity of white conservative voter suppression at the state level - if they could retain the presidency and its patronage. The bargain was made.
When modern senators propose to repeat 1876, they are not endorsing some Solomonic compromise. They are endorsing a negotiated concession to violent conservative minorities.
Over the next half century, the states "redeemed" by white conservatives shriveled into tight oligarchies. I described the process in my book Trumpocracy, p. 141
Democracy in the United States has a contested history. It's being contested again right now. The foundational idea of democracy is that each person counts. Let's commit to proving that theory true in the dangerous week ahead. END.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Frum

David Frum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidfrum

3 Jan
As Trump denounces his own party in Georgia, what are pro-Trump Georgians to make of ...
The super-close political ties between the governor Trump condemns as a "disgrace" governor - and the governor's hand-picked senator? ajc.com/news/state--re…
As Trump rails against "political corruption" among Georgia Republicans, pro-Trump Republicans are asked to vote for a political novice who got a Senate seat only because she promised to spend $20 million of her own money - much of it finding its way to Kemp-allied consultants?
Read 5 tweets
31 Dec 20
On the plus side, at least we'll be spared all that Inauguration Day bumpf about "the uniquely American miracle of the peaceful transfer of power."
Defeated Danish prime ministers do not try to hold onto power by inciting mob violence in the streets of Copenhagen. Defeated UK prime ministers trudge sadly out of 10 Downing Street to hail a taxi.
Helmut Kohl, accepting the peaceful transition of power in Germany, September 1998. alamy.com/stock-photo-dp…
Read 4 tweets
29 Dec 20
.@FareedZakaria is right and wise here. Past US complacency about China is now veering to a policy of confrontation that is a) excessively militarized and b) even more frightening to partners and allies than China's own bad actions.
@FareedZakaria Yes, stand up for human rights in China and Hong Kong.

Yes, challenge China's bad trade practices.

Yes, apply multilateral pressure to constrain China's environmental abuses.

But do all this while always extending the open hand of cooperation to China ...
@FareedZakaria ... because the present path leads toward conflicts as terrible as they are preventable.
Read 6 tweets
26 Dec 20
As of December 23, about 1.01 million Americans had received a first vaccination against COVID. As of today, that number has risen to 1.23 million. A 20% increase in 3 days, one of them Christmas. 1/x
I see a lot of straight line projections. "At this rate ... " But the rate is accelerating! Sometime soon, we'll see our first 100,000 vaccination day. Then soon after that, the first 200,000 vaccination day. We're going to surprise ourselves by the speed of progress. 2/x
Here's the Israeli rate of progress, vaccinations / 100,000 people.
Read 4 tweets
26 Dec 20
Lizzie Collingham is one of my favorite social historians working today. I finished the latest of her books, Biscuit, on Christmas Day. #FrumReads4 1/x

penguin.co.uk/books/111/1118…
Collingham's "Biscuit" is the history of hard-baked bread from ancient times to the box of cookies in the grocery aisle. As always with her work, "Biscuit" uses the device of a foodstuff to open a wide eye upon the surrounding culture. 2/x #FrumReads4
Biscuits, in the British usage of that word, were among the very first industrial foodstuffs. They enabled the British empire - Royal Navy sailors lived upon them - and were in turn enabled by that empire to discover a global market. 3/x
Read 18 tweets
20 Dec 20
I'm experimenting with threaded notes on books I've enjoyed recently
First was Barbara Amiel's "Friends and Enemies"; second, "Silencing the Past" by Michel-Rolph Trouillot. Future items I'll hashtag #FrumReads
Amiel:
Trouillot:
Next up in #FrumReads Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman by Robert K. Massie penguinrandomhouse.com/books/108892/c…
Relations are often testy between academic and non-academic historians. But the best qualities of each should claim respect from the other: the academic's original research and analytic rigor; the non-academic's zeal to hold the interest of the non-specialist reader. 1/x
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!