My analysis of the paper released by #BharatBiotech researchers & the Press Statement by the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) on Restricted Emergency approval of 1out of 3 COVID-19 virus vaccine from Bharat Biotech: A thread...
1. PIB "The Phase III efficacy trial was initiated in India in 25,800 volunteers & till date, ~22,500 participants have been vaccinated across the country"

Fact check "A total of 25,800 subjects will be enrolled & randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive BBV152B vaccine and control"
1. Fact check contd...

A 1:1 ratio means half of 25800 will be enrolled, of which only (almost) 12900 will be given BBV152B vaccine and the other 12900 will be given a placebo, i.e. Phosphate buffered saline PBS with Alum gel (without antigen)

Source: CTRI
In the preprint dated 22 December 2020, data suggests 380 randomised participants out of which one half received 3 µg doses & the other half, 6 µg doses.

Over 921 were screened but eliminated due to exclusion criterion. Thus, 190 per dosage group with additional placebo subjects
2. PIB: "...and the vaccine has been found to be safe as per the data available till date"

Fact check: Safety from Phase 1 trials

Local adverse reactions resolved in 24h:

After 1st dose 4·7% in 3 µg & 4·2% in 6 µg groups
After 2nd dose 2·6% in 3 µg & 3·2% in 6 µg groups
2. contd...

Safety from Phase 1 human trials:

Total adverse reactions including systemic reactions: 9·7% in 3 µg & 10.3% in 6 µg groups.

A total of 6 (28·6%) out of 21 unsolicited adverse events were reported to be related to the vaccine, out of which 1 was in placebo.
Safety from Phase 2 human trials:

TH-1 mediated Cytokines like interleukins, interferons, TNF alpha increase on day 56, 2 weeks after the 2nd dose. This is cell-mediated immunity & proinflammatory.

Last day accounted for: 104 days (3 mons) after the 2nd dose in Phase 1
Safety from Phase 2 human trials (contd.):

TH1 was largely TNF alpha + INF gamma, reported as the ration of TH1: TH2, i.e. cell-mediated: antibody-mediated. A balanced ratio suggests optimum vaccine efficacy. An imbalance may lead to autoimmune/allergy-like conditions.
Safety from Phase 2 human trials (contd.):

This does not mean there was an imbalance in the results. It means that TH1 was higher than TH2. Also, these cell-mediated responses were found similar to the studies conducted by Karolinska, Sweden

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
So does this mean the #BharatBiotech vaccine demonstrates efficacy:

Efficacy is not just a serology test but also determined after exposure. There is no data to suggest efficacy as of 22 Dec based on phase 1 & 2 human trials in a total of 380 people who received vaccine doses.
Interesting to note that in Bharat Biotech data, serum (Human convalescent sera) reported higher neutralising antibodies in symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic. Serum taken after 30-60 days after diagnosis of COVID-19.

Also, no difference across age groups
Part 2.1: #Covishield vaccine tech transfer from AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine (Oxford/AZ-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)

PIB 1: "As 23,745 participant data from the overseas clinical study shows efficacy, SII granted permission to conduct Phase-II/III clinical trial on 1600 subjects in India"
Part 2.2: #Covishield FACT CHECK 1:

The 'overseas' data as listed by PIB was a combination of Brazil, South Africa & UK - recruited 23,848 in total. However, data from only 11,636 was included in the interim primary efficacy analysis.

@TheLancet review thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Part 2.3: Efficacy

PIB 2: Oxford vaccine has efficacy of 70.42%

Fact Check 2: After 2 std. doses, efficacy was 62·1% & those who received low dose after a standard dose, efficacy was 90·0%. Thus, overall efficacy across groups was 70·4% which can be tweaked to a high 90%
Part 2.4 How does #Covishield compare with AZ/ Oxford ?

PIB: SSI was granted permission to conduct Phase-II/III clinical trial on 1600 participants in India. The interim safety & immunogenicity data in this trial matched with the data from the overseas Oxford vaccine studies.
Part 2.4 contd..

CTRI updated on 8th & 26th Dec reported approval received for Phase II/III trials. However, ongoing recruitment for immunogenicity will be tested in only 400 participants randomly assigned in a 3:1
300 in COVISHIELD & 100 in AZ/ Oxford vaccine. (NOT 1600)
Part 2.5: What about the remaining 1200 in the #Covishield trial?

In 3:1 ratio, 1200 recruited in a safety study.
900 receiving Covishield & 300 receiving placebo.

Thus, 300 (comparison immunogenicity study) + 900 (from the safety study)= 1200 in total Covishield subjects
Part 2.6 Comparison of 1200 people vaccinated with Covishield (SII) with 4 months of follow-up in 11 636 participants is negligible. Especially, the immunogenicity comparison with a total of only 400 people.
More on AztraZeneca / Oxford efficacy here on @TheLancet

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Vaccine number 3 by Cadila Healthcare: ZyCov-D

Permission for Phase-III clinical trial in 26,000 Indians granted to ZyCov-D vaccine based on DNA. They are also researching pegylated Interferon-alpha & heat-killed TB bacteria in COVID-19 patients

Thread # 3...
Part 3.1 #cadila

Based only on 1048 participant data of phase 1+2, Cadila got the permission to conduct Phase-III clinical trial in 26000 Indian participants.

If phase I & II had 1048 people & half were in placebo, only about 524 people would have received the vaccine.
3.2 Cadila vaccine is based on a different intradermal administration of the recombinant DNA, unlike the other vaccines. No data is available for safety, efficacy or immunogenicity for this vaccine.

The question remains how does data from <1k get approved for phase III.

//
More on 'news' around the three vaccines by @AnooBhu

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Sumaiya Shaikh

Dr Sumaiya Shaikh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Neurophysik

8 Jul 20
TW & thread: COVID-19, menstruation & depression

Gynaecologists, Obstetrics & women that have recovered from COVID-19:

(Or keen beaners of Covid-19)

Women, How were your menstrual cycles post COVID-19 recovery? Want to know what may have happened?

Read on... 1/n
So we know that SARS-COV2 affects a lot of organs in the body apart from the respiratory system. They infection is systemic after a point and the virus is found in many areas of the body including the brain, liver, gut, & the reproductive organs. But once the recovery is over..2n
What do we know about the after effects? A lot of people have reported generalised fatigue several weeks (6-7 or more) post recovery. Not just physical but mental fatigue. And that conversation about depression I had with @dhruv_rathee was never so timely. Everything hurts...3n
Read 20 tweets
30 Jun 20
My latest: In @AltNewsScience, we previously found Arsenicum Album 30 ineffective as a treatment against coronavirus. Subsequently, AYUSH released annexures to claim that homeopathy strengthens immunity. After reviewing, the claim was found unscientific. altnews.in/homeopathic-dr…
Do you remember the claims of boosting immunity by modulating gene expression of the immune cells via pills? All the science of allosteric regulation to alter proinflammatory cytokines & interleukins? We reviewed each of the studies given by @moayush. Homeopathy is still fraud.
That nanotechnology of homeopathy that work on genes?
The discovery of homoeopathy by Hanemann was in 1796. The first experiment in inheritable units, now we call them genes, was not conducted by Gregor Mendel until 1857-1864, nearly 50 years after the discovery of homeopathy..
Read 4 tweets
30 Jun 20
India’s 'first' indigenous COVID-19 vaccine COVAXIN, developed by @BharatBiotech with @ICMRDELHI & NIV , approved for human clinical trials from the DCGI. The Phase I + II clinical trials to start next month after pre-clinical studies demonstrated safety & immune response. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Update: The @BharatBiotech vaccine (called covaxin) was developed & tested in collaboration with University of Wisconsin & vaccine company FluGen. It is delivered intranasally & has completed Phase II trials in the USA. Bharat will manufacture clinical lots of the vaccine. 1/3
The new @BharatBiotech vaccine will be based on an influenza virus where gene sequences from SARS-CoV-2 are inserted into M2SR- vaccine platform (M2-ion channel protein Deficient Single Replication). 2/3
Read 13 tweets
16 Apr 20
Best thing I have read today:
"Statistics means never having to say you are certain. If a statistical conclusion ever seems certain, you probably are misunderstanding something. The whole point of statistics is to quantify uncertainty."
I am going to keep this going for now:
"Every statistical inference is based on a list of assumptions. Don't try to interpret any statistical results until after you have reviewed that list...1/3
...An assumption behind every statistical calculation is that the data were randomly sampled, or at least representative of, a larger population of values that could have been collected...2/3
Read 9 tweets
31 Mar 20
The pH range is 0 (strong acidic)- 7 (neutral) - 14 (strong base).
A pH above 14 doesn't exist. Viruses have RNA (ribonucleic acid), protein & lipids as their components. Acidity is measured by Isoelectric point pH (I) is the pH at which molecules have no net electric charge.1/n
...Since, most proteins and lipids are considered weakly acidic, the myth of using alkaline foods to counter the protein in the virus may have started. It's true that most proteins 'may' be structurally altered or unfolded in high alkaline/acidic pH. But, humans are mammals..2/n
...And mammals are not reptiles. We have good homeostatic capacity to regulate temperature and pH in our body. So it is very hard to make yourself 'too acidic' or 'too basic' with food. You can have more acid/base in your blood in a condition called acidosis or alkalosis...3/n
Read 5 tweets
19 Feb 20
Mr @SadhguruJV, no one challenged that mother's milk can possibly be altered as/ the baby's gender, plus factors like duration of lactation, mother's diet+body, mother's genetics, etc. The contesting claim was only specific to twin babies & each breast producing different milk.
The other factors like mother's diet and frequency of lactation probably have a larger impact on the milk composition than the gender itself. It is impossible to determine impact of gender behind composition due to many confounding factors which can never be verified on its own..
The article by facthunt.in actually uses only one scientific study. Rest are blogs which also mention the other confounding factors such as mother's age, baby's age, duration of feed, time of feed, mother's diet and her environment....
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!