There's this idea, now infecting even the Remain "side", that Remainers ought to be moving to a more accommodating, accepting position. No. Leavers ought to be putting their hands up and admitting this is not the Brexit they promised or intended, and showing some humility.
1/4
Nor is it a question of "meeting in the middle", fond as I am of compromise. Remainers did not bring this about, nor lie to achieve it; they did not take away people's rights and freedoms; they did not "fuck" business. They do not continue to lie about its "upside".
2/4
But the bottom line is this: the exhortation to "come together" is not genuine. On the tail end of "You lost, get over it", in the wake of a FAR harder Brexit than anyone contemplated in 2016, and with no attempt to offer the remotest comfort to Remainers, it amounts simply
3/4
to fake conciliation, a smirking request to a victim not for forgiveness but solidarity, even gratitude - as someone here said, like watching your house burn down and then being invited by your unrepentant arsonist to "come together". Let's call this what it is: gaslighting.
4/4
PS. Can there ever be a rapprochement? For the sake of our country, there has to be. But it cannot start with an instruction to approve; instead it needs an honest conversation, and a truthful appraisal of what we now know Brexit to mean. We're a long way from that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Flabbergasted at the cost of Covid - a debt we will all carry - and furious all over again at the regime's gross incompetence. Not just the lives ruined, but the economy shattered. They didn't "fix the roof when the sun was shining" - we were caught completely on the hop - ...
..and when the rain did come, they insisted we would be impervious to it; that there was no way it could bring our great British ceiling down. But by any economic or social measure, the ceiling is down.
How bad, compared to others?
Chart shows perhaps the worst net economic hit in Europe (worse even than Spain, which is predicted to bounce back better in 2021).
On economic damage, Tory "stewardship" is one of the worst in Europe. On loss of life, same.
Trust me, if you had been in or near a Covid ward, if you had been struggling for breath with no idea whether they'd end up intubating you, or whether you'd see your family, or even a whole human face again, if you had felt that icy fear, the terrifying loneliness of it...
/1
... you would NEVER spout that "we'll just have to learn to live alongside it" BS. Instead, you'd want, as I do - on behalf of all those who have suffered, who have died, who have nursed and attended - to punch the f*cking lights out of anyone who repeats it...
/2
.. and as for the academics, those few, those happy few, who for reasons of attention or contrariness or stupidity or sponsorship - God knows - who, without submitting to peer review, pronounce with gravitas these same "it's just flu" lies...
/3
How, HOW, has it been that the politicians destroying the UK have managed to claim to be patriots, and decry their detractors as traitors? HOW?
How can those who have shamed their country on the international stage, who have literally turned their backs on our European neighbours in a show of teenage petulance, how can they be the patriots?
How can those who have kicked their own country out of the market square, like sulking cheats caught leaning on the scales, be the patriots?
There's an idea with alarming currency which suggests that young people, who are less likely to suffer and die with Covid, should not have their lives "put on hold", and older and more vulnerable folk should hide away while the young get on and go about their business.
/1
That this idea is still given credence - eg @bbcnickrobinson put it to the WHO Europe fella today on R4 - makes me feel sick.
What kind of society needs reminding that we each have a duty to protect our parents, our families, and the wider community?
/2
Because the point isn't that the young are safer; that's only half the story. The other half is that what they might spread is massively, cataclysmically lethal.
In no other circumstance would we defend lethal behaviour on the basis of the individual's own comparative safety.
/3
What the Prosecco-drinking doomster/gloomster/snowflakes who predict 2nd and 3rd surges don't understand is that we hold all the cards in this battle, with our "world-beating" tracing system and our status as "international buyer of choice" for PPE.
The doomsters moaned and cried big tears that it would be "Armageddon" if we didn't lock down early, but look outside? Do you see Armageddon? No! Our brilliant NHS coped, didn't it?
But STILL they moan, inventing "65,000 deaths", etc. You lost, lockdown moaners! Get over it!
Lesser countries can only look at how we've taken back control from the virus and weep (behind their scaredy-cat masks) at their own Johnny-foreigner ineptitude.