McConnell actively sought to prevent his senators from challenging the election. Now that they are, he's not whipping anyone against it but has spoken to at least half the Senate GOP conference about the matter
@marianne_levine McConnell told senators on a recent conference call that “this is a very difficult decision for each one of you, you each have to make it yourselves,” recounted Sen. Cramer. “‘I've voted twice on declarations of war.’ And he said, ‘this is right up there.’"
@marianne_levine “He’s letting everybody reach their own conclusion here. That’s very much his leadership style on issues like this, is to not say much. I think he hopes we don’t have too many people vote to do this,” said one R senator
"I don't think he's enjoying it," deadpanned a second
@marianne_levine Objectors Daines and Tuberville say they haven't spoken to McConnell. After she was sworn in, asked Lummis what the leadership reaction has been: “A happy day for us. It’s been wonderful.”
Marshall: “Some of the greatest Super Bowl champions had a day of division.”
@marianne_levine While Trump is fighting his electoral loss, McConnell is shaping where his party stands before Ga.
McConnell simply doesn't criticize Trump but is steering the party away from him
- No $2,000 checks
- NDAA override of Trump's veto
- Most Senate Rs expected to certify election
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
McConnell speaking now against Trump's efforts to overturn the election: "I supported the president's right to use the legal system"
"The courts rejected these claims"
"Nothing before us proves illegality anywhere near the massive scale that would have tipped the entire election. Nor can public doubt alone justify a radical break, when the doubt itself was incited without any evidence"
"The voters, the courts and the states have all spoken. They've all spoken. If we overrule them it would damage our republic forever. This election actually wasn't unusually close"
@marianne_levine Some of the latest rejections of this effort: Cramer, Hoeven and Inhofe
Inhofe says: "A violation of my oath of office — that is not something I am willing to do and is not something Oklahomans would want me to do"
@marianne_levine Meanwhile we are getting a sense for how this will play out. Cruz will object to Arizona, Hawley will object to Pennsylvania, Loeffler will object to Georgia and Marshall will object to all three. So that's a minimum three debates and votes tomorrow. House members may want more
Portman, up In ‘22, “swearing to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I plan on honoring that oath by supporting the state certifications and the will of the people. I will vote to certify in accordance with my duty under the Constitution.”
Capito, just re-elected: “Our democracy permits enjoying electoral victories, but its survival requires accepting defeats. Despite a landslide victory in West Virginia, President Trump lost his re-election bid by a margin of 306-232 in the Electoral College.”
Hawley fundraising message this afternoon: "When I took my Oath of Office, I swore to not only uphold the Constitution, but also to serve YOU! By objecting on January 6th, I am maintaining my obligations as a United States Senator"
R senator: “It’s infighting we don’t need before a very significant run-off ...There’s a lot of pressure to support the president [but] all of us are sworn to uphold the Constitution, not the presidency”
What’s happening within GOP echoes 2013 defund ACA fight, an effort that snowballs until it becomes a popular position. Cruz and Hawley similarly fundraising off election objections
But the stakes are different. This isn’t about policy, but about trust in elections
“I’m concerned about the division in America, that’s the biggest issue, but obviously this is not healthy for the Republican Party,” lamented Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). “This is bad for the country and bad for the party.” (Ht @frankthorp)
Mitt Romney called Hawley’s move “disappointing and destructive. And borrowing from Ben Sasse it’s ambition pointing a gun at the head of democracy.”
“I’m going to vote to certify the election,” said Wicker. “I don’t think it’s a good idea and I don’t understand his reasoning”
“It seems to me this is an exercise in futility,” Cornyn said. “There are probably 70 million people who would rather see Trump elected. So I think it may not be very popular [in the GOP]. But sometimes you’ve got to do unpopular things because it’s the right thing to do”