Curious what specific actions Raffensperger took that you see as credible
Judge Totenberg stated repeatedly in ruling that true RLA audits of results using Dominion equipment were inherently not possible.
Ben Adida's (VotingWorks) arguments to contrary were demolished in court.
Judge Totenberg stated repeatedly in ruling that true RLA audits of results using Dominion equipment were inherently not possible.
Ben Adida's (VotingWorks) arguments to contrary were demolished in court.
https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley/status/1346203394785103872
Raffensperger knew this as he was party to lawsuit. And his general counsel, Ryan Germany, was on at least one critical court hearing.
That didn't stop him from issuing press release celebrating results of RLA as definitive.
Was used by media everywhere.
sos.ga.gov/index.php/elec…
That didn't stop him from issuing press release celebrating results of RLA as definitive.
Was used by media everywhere.
sos.ga.gov/index.php/elec…
VotingWorks performed the RLA...
Raffensberger also used CISA release on "Election Integrity" at one point to defend Georgia's results.
Despite almost certainly having to know that both Dominion & Pro V&V were part of council that issued statement.
Raffensberger also used CISA release on "Election Integrity" at one point to defend Georgia's results.
Despite almost certainly having to know that both Dominion & Pro V&V were part of council that issued statement.
Raffensperger promoted audit by Pro V&V of Dominion equipment.
“Pro V&V found no evidence of the machines being tampered.”
Raffensperger failed to disclose that Pro V&V had preexisting relationship w/Dominion dating back years.
And didn't do real audit.
theepochtimes.com/firm-that-cond…
“Pro V&V found no evidence of the machines being tampered.”
Raffensperger failed to disclose that Pro V&V had preexisting relationship w/Dominion dating back years.
And didn't do real audit.
theepochtimes.com/firm-that-cond…
Raffensperger knew of many problems w/Dominion equipment from GA lawsuits.
Judge: Implementation of systems places voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which the judge defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Judge: Implementation of systems places voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which the judge defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Why was there a signature audit of Cobb County (a red county) but steadfast refusal to perform a signature audit of Fulton County?
I could keep going. But hopefully you get the point.
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
I could keep going. But hopefully you get the point.
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
