I want to make a quick point about the importance of cultural commentary.
It's something we regularly provide at @ArcDigi, so a brief word on it is perhaps in order.
This sort of work sometimes gets framed as "culture war" writing. That's accurate sometimes. Or accurate in one sense. But not quite right in the main way that word is now seen.
The way many of us—myself included—have come to understand the "Culture War" is as a kind of intellectual failure. As a genre involving the elevation of petty and unremarkable grievances into a privileged place within our discourse.
As I see it, the *good* version of this will involve meaningful reflection on significant cultural issues—especially the ones currently undergoing society-wide discussion, the ones currently being subjected to ongoing negotiation.
Good cultural commentary moves beyond the originating event and trains its evaluative sights on the values operating at the level *underneath* the event. That is, at the value-level *underlying* whatever incident the culture warriors are all up in arms about.
Recently, at @ArcDigi, we used the occasion of the NYT cheerleader/Snapchat video episode as a jumping-off point to delve into important issues that *gave rise* to that incident in the first place.
"We Have to Let Teenagers Make Mistakes and Grow" by @NGrossman81
These are all different takes. We're not interested in publishing the same piece twice. Some directly engage each other; others are standalone pieces.
We don't expect anyone to agree with all four. It's impossible to do so, since some of the claims are mutually exclusive.
But core to what we do is an expectation we carry with us: it's the idea that if you read what we publish—such as, for example, in this loose series—we think you'll end up with a *better understanding* of these issues than before. That's our goal, anyway.
If you think we're a good thing in the digital commentary ecosystem, please consider supporting us at $5 per month.
I rarely ever post a link to our Patreon. But we could use the support in 2021.
In their effort to #whatabout yesterday's Capitol invaders, people on the MAGA-sympathetic right are making two glaring mistakes about last summer post-Floyd movement.
The first involves failing to make a distinction between the protests and gatherings that were largely safe and legal, and the rioting and looting that were decidedly not.
Conflating everything into some sort of rhetorically effective but substantively empty descriptor like "summer riots" or "BLM riots" just marks you off as a partisan hack. The majority of post-Floyd assembly was fine.
I understand backing your guy. But that doesn't necessarily require you to back him to the fullest extent that he's asking.
If my friend asks me to give him a letter of recommendation, I'm there. If he asks me to sign an affidavit that he's a ninja turtle, too far. Can't do it.
It's neither cute nor winsome to be a discourse mark.
Troll accounts, like the one being defended here, don't deserve to be shielded from their misbehavior by Not On Your Side Centrists harnessing their shitposting into a narrative about platforms being totalitarian. Get a grip.