if i say "folk psychology" do normal people know what that is
does this get the gist across 
one of the things I have learned from the anti-trans backlash is that philosophers absolutely do not have a clear idea of the kinds of questions our methods can address (notably not empirical ones)
stock has an article where she argues for gender identity conversion therapy on the basis of conceptual analysis about what "conversion therapy" is. in her aristotelian society talk she did conceptual analysis for a conclusion about STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
and other philosophers are not like "this methodology absolutely cannot do these things"! which seems disciplinarily not great! feels like academic disciplines should have solid understanding of like, what its methods can do
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
