Now some serious stuff. Three of the most impactful crops these missionary backed imperialists grew in India - 1. Opium to destroy China. British India in 1906 produced more drugs than Columbia and Afghanistan combined at their respective peaks.
2. Indigo leading to widespread famines in Bengal 3. Groundnut for which vast swathes of forests were chopped down because groundnut doesn't grow in shade. Anantapur still sees the devastating effects of that.
Cotton. This is how Europeans thought about cotton. And cotton existed from the time there ancestors were covering themselves with hides and leaves. They called it Vegetable Lamb of Tartary.
This one I like it. You chop the fingers of the weavers who make the finest cotton and then reintroduce Indian cotton to the world? This is called Ehiteman's Burden - you create a mess and call cleaning up that mess a burden.
So, these colonizers went back in time before the Tocharians arrived in 1500 BC and taught them about ginger? Even today it is debated whether the word Ginger came from Sanskrit or Tocharian - and that was even before the mythical Moses is created.
May be, that's why we don't have the words like Potato Christians unlike Rice Christian - either no one ate potatoes or stopping supply didn't cause massive food shortages.
They forgot to tell one thing about cocoa - permissible levels of cockroach body parts per 100 grams of chocolate.
But there is one important thing which Indians taught the missionaries and which became a part and parcel of their lives. How to clean one's own bottom.
Reminds me...do you know which is the largest rodent? It's not capybara and that's because according to missionaries, capybara is a fish. To convert Venezuelans who loved capybara flesh, they allowed them to eat this fish during Lent.
The day America allowed a private company to publicly brand their President as spreader of fake news, the writing was on the wall. I don't care whether it's Trump or Biden or anybody. He is the President of America and that's where the discussion should end.
The position holds a sanctity and respect and empires crumbled just because the chair is not given the respect it deserves. After India thrashed Pakistan badly in 1971 and dismemebered it, an Indian politician used the word Indira is India and India is Indira.
That is the syndrome we need to avoid. Indira is not India. Indira is not India. Indira is the Prime Minister of India and she is the official face of India. Any hatred towards Indira shouldn't become hatred for India.
Another thread, this time, Treaties of Accession of India's Princely States. I will try to post the original documents here for as many states as I can. First one itself is on the wrong footing. 1. Junagadh's Accession to Pakistan -
When Patel got the news that Junagadh has fallen, Munshi was by his side. He said to Munshi, Now Somnath Can be Built. That is called clarity of thought.
A Christian writes to Gandhi asking how India can spend money on building temples and Gandhi concurs 🤦🏻♀️ While Nehru completely opposed building of Somnath Temple, Gandhi wanted it to be funded by Hindu public and Patel wanted state to build it.
Forgot to tell. That Christian fellow said even the exchequer of Junagadh shouldn't fund the temple. But love for Gandhi was more than anything else. When Gandhi asked him to, Patel concurred and said Centre will not fund Somnath reconstruction.
The debate over law and order comes to the forefront yet again. Law and order - both can be maintained with equal zeal. One needs to take precedence over the other. Will that be Order over Law or Law over Order?
In other words, what do governments prefer - looking away the other side when law is broken with impunity in the fear that acting against the offender will lead to large scale rioting on the roads?
Or will the government gear up to uphold the sanctity of law and punish every single one trying to break it? There are many examples. Take the Tablighi Wuhan Wave. Or Bangalore Riots. Or the destruction of Temples in Andhra.