Good morning. I’ll have updates on Julian Assange’s bail hearing on this thread today. The hearing takes place at 10 am GMT at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London. @RSF_inter calls again for Assange’s immediate release.

#FreeAssange 1/
I’m on my way to court. Escaped the hellish queue for the public gallery today only because Assange’s family have been kind enough to put me on their list - so unless the court pulls something funny, I should get in without problems today. 2/
The thought of walking into court at a reasonable time and taking a seat like a normal person today seems like a luxury. We’ve been treated so terribly in monitoring hearings in this case since last February. Again, this is not how we’re accustomed to doing our jobs, anywhere. 3/
Not having to queue outside for hours also creates less chance of the police harassing and pressuring us, as they did on Monday, when we were repeatedly threatened with arrest. Now that the UK has entered a national lockdown, even stricter measures will be in place. 4/
This morning, Judge Baraitser will decide whether to release Assange on bail, or whether to keep him detained in Belmarsh prison until the appeals process is exhausted. Remember, she has previously denied him bail twice. 5/
In our view, it would be extremely harsh to keep Assange detained when the judge has explicitly outlined his serious mental health issues, which would be exacerbated with prolonged detention. If this is grounds to deny extradition, it’s also grounds for immediate release. 6/
The current risk to Assange’s physical health is also alarming, given the high rate of Covid infections on his prison block of Belmarsh prison. He suffers from respiratory issues which leave him at higher medical risk. He must be released. 7/
This is also a matter of principle. Enough is enough. After his 10-year ordeal, Julian Assange should not be deprived of his liberty for another day. No one should have to experience what he has for publishing information in the public interest. 8/
I’ll keep you updated to the extent possible. Unlike the Old Bailey, we can keep our devices at Westminster Magistrates’ Court - but I won’t be able to use them in the public gallery during the hearing itself (unlike journalists who are covering it). 9/
In the meantime, here’s @RSF_inter’s statement on Monday’s ruling. Although the decision not to extradite Assange is a relief, the substance of the decision is of serious concern for journalism and press freedom. rsf.org/en/reports/uk-… 10/
Still having trouble at the court entrance. I’m not sure I will be allowed in, even on Assange’s family list. 11/
I have not been allowed in, nor have two of Assange’s actual relatives. Once again, nothing is normal in this case. Proceedings have started, so follow journalists who have access to the Cloud Video Platform. I’ll do a live video in a second. 12/
Live from outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court as we await a decision. 13/
I got in for the last 10 minutes of the hearing as someone stepped out and gave me their place (a student who had queued since 3 am - THANK YOU 🙏) 14/
The judge ruled that Assange must remain in custody at Belmarsh prison - in our view an unnecessarily cruel decision. Assange should not have to spend another moment unjustly deprived of his liberty. 15/
The judge stated that Assange has incentive to abscond and was unlikely to present himself for justice if released on bail. She also stated that his mental health is being managed in Belmarsh, and that the prison has the Covid situation under control. 16/
That was the first time I’ve had direct sight of Assange since February (as at the Old Bailey I could only access the overflow court to watch a live stream). He looked better than he did at Woolwich, was alert and following proceedings. 17/
I didn’t think I was still capable of disappointment in this case, but apparently I still am. This court cannot undo the past 10 years of hell Assange had endured, but the judge could have made it right going forward. She failed - again, unnecessarily cruelly. 18/
I understand that police behaved far more aggressively after I got into court. We got moved along (as you saw in my earlier video), but they otherwise left us alone today - I think only because I was constantly speaking to media so they could see I was there professionally. 19/
Trying to get somewhere I can get @RSF_inter’s statement out, which is extremely difficult in lockdown London (it’s even illegal to stay still outside). Back soon. 20/
Oh here’s another live video I did commenting on the decision. 20/
This morning some journalists I had never seen before were pushing through the queue and complaining that they had been there since 8 am and might not get in. What I wanted to say: welcome to our hell, and 8 am is a luxury. 21/
Don’t get me wrong, I am really pleased the international media is now out in full force on Assange’s case, but my god, it would have made a difference if we had seen anything like this much earlier on. 22/
I despair at the thought of how much time & energy we lost trying to mobilise those who should have been on side in the first place: the media, free expression & human rights communities. Unity earlier on would have allowed for much greater pressure on the states responsible. 23/
Also, I appreciate all of the private messages of support, but what I really could have used from fellow NGOs was more manpower in monitoring these proceedings. RSF shouldn’t have been fighting for access alone. You say resources, I say: we have a team of two in London. 24/
As things stand, I’m utterly exhausted. Not just from this week, but cumulatively, from all of it. But I’m very proud of what we’ve accomplished - and we’re far from done. We need to get him out. We need this case closed. And we need to make sure this can’t happen ever again. 25/
Here’s @RSF_inter’s statement on today’s unnecessarily cruel and disproportionately punitive decision. 26/
Closing out this thread for today, but will keep tweeting separately. Thank you for following this week, and for the many kind words of support! /27

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rebecca Vincent

Rebecca Vincent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rebecca_vincent

5 Jan
Hello new followers! Can I introduce you to some of @RSF_inter’s other priority cases? They all deserve much more attention and support! Thread.
#DaphneCaruanaGalizia was a courageous Maltese journalist assassinated by a car bomb near her home in October 2017. More than three years on, there’s still been no justice for Daphne or the extensive corruption she had uncovered. Some background here: rsf.org/en/news/malta-…
We are working to support her family’s campaign for #JusticeforDaphne. Follow @daphnefdtn, her sons @mcaruanagalizia, @acaruanagalizia & @pcaruanagalizia, her sisters @Corinne_Vella & @MandyMallia, and her niece @meg_mallia. @TheShiftNews is also an excellent resource.
Read 12 tweets
4 Jan
Good morning from the Old Bailey! Today’s the big day, as we await the extradition decision in the case against @wikileaks publisher Julian Assange. I’ll have updates on this thread.

#FreeAssange 1/
5 hours to go until the 10am hearing. We’re already queuing outside in early morning winter temperatures to have a fighting chance of gaining access to the public gallery. This is how we’re left to try to do our jobs as the judge refuses to recognise the role of NGO observers. 2/
My makeshift office during this long, cold morning.

Actual conversation just now: how long does it take to get hypothermia?

Sunrise is still a long way off at 8:06 am...

3/
Read 25 tweets
3 Jan
I’ve often said that nothing is normal about Julian Assange’s case. Here’s my list of the top 10 least normal aspects, strictly on the logistical side of monitoring the extradition proceedings (this is not to mention the many substantive issues that are also far from normal).
1. The judge’s stubbornly persistent refusal to acknowledge that NGO observers are professionals and have an important role to play (separate to that of the general public) in ensuring open justice, and refusal to grant us access to be able to do our jobs properly.
2. The constantly shifting goal posts in gaining access to the public gallery, and arbitrary restrictions on numbers in all 3 courts where proceedings have been held. On any given day, it’s impossible to predict how many will be let in and when, necessitating very early queuing.
Read 12 tweets
11 Dec 20
Okay, I’m not done yet (still furious). The barriers we’ve faced monitoring proceedings in Assange’s case are extensive and evolving, and cannot be purely coincidence or incompetence, as it’s been at 3 separate courts and happened pre-Covid too. The common factor is the judge.
It is the judge who refuses to recognise NGO observers as different to the public & who revoked NGOs’ remote access. When we face barriers on entry, court officials say the judge set the (arbitrary) limitations on numbers. She even set the freezing temperature at the Old Bailey.
I won’t speculate yet on the outcome of the extradition proceedings, as I sincerely hope that justice will prevail and that the system isn’t as broken as I fear. But one has to question what is the motive in making even a 90-second hearing so unbelievably difficult to observe.
Read 8 tweets
11 Dec 20
Back at Westminster Magistrates’ Court this morning attempting to monitor a call over hearing in the case of @wikileaks publisher Julian Assange. This is the last such hearing scheduled before the extradition decision will be given on 4 January.

Thread. 1/
The goal posts for access constantly shift at this court, in a completely arbitrary manner. We are currently being told by a court official that no journalists will be allowed in (told they can access the Cloud Video Platform) and only two people can access the public gallery. 2/
At times, even under Covid measures, four journalists have been allowed into the well of this same courtroom, and five people into the public gallery. Two in total today is completely arbitrary. We’re told the access restrictions are the judge’s decision. 3/
Read 12 tweets
8 Dec 20
“When it comes to justice for Daphne, so far there is none”: @PieterOmtzigt’s strong words as he concludes his mandate as PACE Special Rapporteur on ensuring justice for #DaphneCaruanaGalizia’s assassination and strengthening the rule of law in Malta. Watch the whole thing.
@PieterOmtzigt: “From the Assembly’s point of view, implementation is unsatisfactory. The rule of law situation in Malta remains deficient, especially when it comes to fighting corruption”.
“The alleged mastermind...may be released from pre-trial detention before he can even be indicted”. An extremely important point being overlooked by international media who reported widely on Yorgen Fenech’s arrest last year. There’s a very real risk he could avoid prosecution.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!