I lived on Capitol Hill for a year, walking past the Capitol many many times. It seemed completely beyond the pale that the barricades around it could be breached, and *while* a vote count is going on.
Police being unprepared for this when it was announced widely is on the one hand unbelievable. On the other hand, it's par for the course.
There always seem to be some protesters they're way more worried about than others. I wonder why that is, can't quite put my finger on it…
They're inside Statuary Hall. Absolutely crazy.
German Neo-Nazis tried to storm the Reichstag this summer. They did not succeed but it was seen as a shameful failure of the authorities. bbc.com/news/world-eur…
Looks like the American far right was more successful.
I am literally shaking, an ocean away.
PBS is interviewing a Trumpist who got inside and it's hard to watch. Not an inkling of understanding he's guilty of anything.
Joe Biden will continue to try to "heal" the country and bridge the divide, but seriously… how do you reach conspiracists chanting "USA USA" while trying to steal a democratic election?
They're doing so standing on the steps of the Capitol, illegally breaking in while votes are aupposed to be counted.
This is a siege.
There's a lot of blame to go around for this. But there's one person who is responsible above all.
How he's treated by his party after January 20th will say a lot about what hope there is for democracy to reassert itself forcefully in America.
Since we heard the old "shining city upon a hill" line earlier: the point of it was always that the world would see everything.
It will matter greatly what the news media calls the events of January 6 going forward.
Do we have a coup? A putsch? An insurrection? The storming of the Capitol? Trumpist terrorism? Will there be a pithy shorthand, and if so, will it be reasonably accurate and descriptive?
As a historian, what watching the attack unfold on television brought home to me is once again something basic but often forgotten in the mythologizations of public remembrance:
The people who did this are extremely normal. Despite their wild conspiracies.
There are millions like them. Millions who approve, millions who don't approve but don't not approve enough to care, millions who see this assault on democracy and order as something noble.
H/t to @manwithoutatan for pointing out the existence of this execrable piece of Confederate apologia plus random Lee "facts" of questionable truth value to me.
Normalize reading articles, not just headlines. From the NYT piece:
"I don’t think anybody who is not on the internet in a real way in the Year of our Lord 2020 and loses an election can blame anyone else when you’re not even really on the internet."
The main point AOC is making in the New York Times is about *how* to run a campaign, not *what* the message should be.
She's not shy about pushing her progressive brand of politics, but if that's your main takeaway from the criticism, you're misreading the interview.
"If you’re not door-knocking, if you’re not on the internet, if your main points of reliance are TV and mail, then you’re not running a campaign on all cylinders. I just don’t see how anyone could be making ideological claims when they didn’t run a full-fledged campaign."
Newt Gingrich claiming the election was stolen without evidence is major Newt Gingrich writing a dissertation about the Congo without ever going there energy.
"There is no evidence in the text that he traveled either to Belgium or to the Congo, and he seems not to have interviewed any of the principal actors, Belgian or Congolese, even though the dissertation was written only a handful of years after the departure of the Belgians […]"
People keep finding new angles in these concession speeches.
Here's one: when George H. Bush concedes, his supporters clap. When John McCain concedes, his supporters boo.
I'm not going to pretend that once there was a great era of civility and we have sadly left it. Evoking the need for civility is always also a strategy of power.
But I did find this contrast striking.
I became interested in this small data point. How did other crowds react to concessions?
Losers in presidential elections started formally conceding around the turn of the 20th century. William Jennings Bryan's telegram to McKinley in 1896 started that trend.