PBS Newshour reporter describes protesters shattering the glass on doors to the Capitol building, you can hear the pounding on the front door of the US Capitol in the background as she speaks - no police in the area where she's reporting
"Protestors are using the staff of an American flag to try to break through these windows," reporter says. She's talking about protestors at a balcony door/window.
She now reports that protestors are inside the building. Lawmakers have been moved to a safer location.
Protestor inside the Capitol building has opened the door to let hundreds of other protestors inside. A single Capitol police officer is trying to hold them back. "The only thing helping this situation is that the door is just barely open" allowing only one protestor in at a time
"Capitol police are unable to stop them." Reporter says that protestors are now streaming into the Capitol building at will.
Reporter asks one of the protestors who has broken into the Capitol building if they don't think their actions are violent. "Was the 1776 revolution violent?" he responds.
"The security of the federal government has been breached," reporter says. What does this say to foreign adversaries that protestors can casually enter the Capitol building after breaking glass with a flagstaff without police resistance?
DC mayor has called for a curfew that will begin at 6:30 pm EST this evening and run to 6:30 am EST.
Trump (or someone ghostwriting his Twitter account) has tweeted for protestors to "stay peaceful"
Protestor has now entered the House chamber and is at the lectern.
Judy Woodruff just said someone was shot inside the Capitol. But then she backtracked and said that hasn't been confirmed yet. She was reading something out loud as it was streaming - I think she didn't mean to say it out loud.
A DC medic is the source of the info that someone was shot inside the Capitol - still not independently confirmed. There is also video of protestors inside Senate chambers rummaging through the desks of senators.
It's been confirmed that someone was shot and was wheeled out of the Capitol. Reports are saying it was a woman. Video here:
Here's a wider shot of the standoff image - unclear if this was the source of the shot that hit the female protestor in the neck. I don't have a credit for this image but will add if I find it.
Here's video from earlier showing protestors breaking breaking glass to enter Capitol building
Video from inside the Senate chamber before the shooting occurred. HuffPost reporter who took video subsequently tweeted that shot was fired INTO the Senate chamber from outside, not fired from inside the chamber (but that is unconfirmed at this point)
Video from inside chamber before shot was fired. HuffPost reporter who posted video says the shot was fired INTO the chamber from outside, not from inside the chamber (that is unconfirmed though)
Here's a still shot from the video of the woman right after she was shot in the hallway outside the chamber. This person with rifle is outside the chamber telling protestors to move away from the chamber door. I assume he's a police officer and not an armed protestor, but unclear
NBC reports that the woman who was shot today inside the Capitol building has died and that it was law enforcement who shot her. "A woman was shot inside the Capitol by a member of law enforcement and later died, several law enforcement officials said" nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
Noose erected by protestors outside the Capitol building today
Two more tweets to clarify something. It appears previous images I tweeted of officers w/ guns inside chamber are not from shooting incident. A vid that shows the woman precisely when she was shot shows her climbing through door that opens to hallway, not to chamber. See nxt twt
You can see image of her here on the right, wearing a red, white and blue backpack as she starts to climb through the window in the door. You can see that it's not the same door that is shown in the other images taken from inside the chamber. She was shot a second after this.
This image from another vid appears to show the female protestor who was killed, as she first entered Capitol building. The woman at right holding phone in her hand is wearing a kerchief and backpack that appear to match what the woman who was killed wore.
NYPost identified woman who was killed - a married AirForce vet from CA named Ashli Babbit. Yesterday she tweeted: “Nothing will stop us…they can try and try and try but the storm is here and it is descending upon DC in less than 24 hours…dark to light." nypost.com/2021/01/06/pro…
Local San Diego TV station where the woman lived says that Babbit was a 14-year veteran, who served four tours with the US Air Force, and "was a high level security official throughout her time in service."
Missed this video yesterday, but it shows clearly the gun that shot Ashli Babbitt yesterday. Wasn't clear to me yesterday where the shot originated. Video clip is here:
Rep. Markwayne Mullin, (R-Oklahoma) witnessed the shooting and said it was justified. "They were trying to come through the front door, which is where I was at in the chamber, and in the back they were trying to come through the speaker's lobby, ...
and that's problematic when you're trying to defend two fronts. When they broke the glass in the back, the lieutenant that was there...he didn't have a choice at that time. The mob was going to come through the door, there was a lot of members and staff that were in danger...
"And when he [drew] his weapon, that's a decision that's very hard for anyone to make and, once you draw your weapon like that, you have to defend yourself with deadly force." Mullin said he believed the police 'showed a lot of restraint' and 'did the best they could"
"That young lady's family's lives changed and [the officer's] life also changed," Mullin said. "But what also happened is that mob...left. And his actions...may be judged in a lot of different ways moving forward, but his actions I believe saved people's lives even more."
Bellingcat has synchronized four videos of the shooting of Ashli Babbitt yesterday, showing it from different angles.
Finished reading @zachsdorfman's 3-part series on espionage dance between China/CIA. Packed w/great reporting/detail Zach fleshes out how mutual spying and power dynamics unfolded over last decade w/ focus on massive hacking campaigns. Highly recommend foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/21/chi…
And part 3 - how China's intelligence services co-opted its tech companies to assist with processing the massive amounts of data China has stolen through hacking ops foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/23/chi…
I've seen a lot of misinfo published since the election by well-meaning people who, in trying to counter false election-fraud claims, overstate the current state of election security/integrity. Here's a good piece by experts that lays out the facts👇 barrons.com/articles/elect…
"Even though there is no compelling evidence the 2020 vote was rigged, U.S. elections are insufficiently equipped to counter such claims because of a flaw in American voting. The way we conduct elections does not routinely produce public evidence that outcomes are correct."
"We need evidence-based...processes that create strong public evidence that the reported winners really won and the reported losers really lost...
Currently, only 4 states (Colorado, Nevada, Rhode Island, and Virginia) have statutory requirements for risk-limiting audits"
New: SolarWinds backdoor infected at least 15 entities in critical infrastructure incl electric/oil/gas/manufacture + 3 managed service providers for crit infr. No evidence hackers used backdoor to enter but may be difficult to tell due to lack of logging theintercept.com/2020/12/24/sol…
Managed service providers can have authorized remote access directly into critical infr + privileges that let them alter network, install software, and control critical operations. This means hackers who breach a provider can potentially use that provider’s credentials and access
“If [provider] has access to a network, and it’s bi-directional, it’s usually for more sensitive equipment like turbine control, and you could actually do disruptive actions," @RobertMLee told me. "But just because you have access...doesn’t mean they can then flip off the lights”
Per briefing today on SolarWinds hack, @RonWyden says IRS was not compromised or taxpayer data affected. However, hack of Treasury Department "appears to be significant." Treasury breach began in July, "the full depth of which isn’t known."
Microsoft notified Treasury Dept that dozens of email accounts were compromised. Additionally the hackers broke into systems in the Departmental Offices division of Treasury, home to Treasury's highest-ranking officials. Treasury still doesn't know precisely what info was stolen.
.@RonWyden on SW: “[A]fter yrs of gov officials advocating for encryption backdoors and ignoring warnings from [infosec] experts who said...encryption keys [are targets] for hackers, the USG has..suffered a breach that seems to involve...stealing encryption keys from USG servers”
New: SolarWinds hackers did test-run of spy operation in Oct 2019, when malicious SolarWinds files were first downloaded by customers. That version didn't have backdoor in it, however. Indicates hackers were in SolarWinds network in 2019, if not earlier. news.yahoo.com/hackers-last-y…
Investigators have so far found no evidence the attackers did anything to infected machines once the malicious Oct 2019 SolarWinds software was installed; suggests this was just a dry-run to test that their malicious files would deliver to customer machines and not be detected.
I also clarify in story how FireEye first discovered breach. It occurred when the hackers, who already had an employee's credentials, used those to register their own device to FireEye's multi-factor authentication system so they could receive the employee's unique access codes.
Wow, this is bold. Employee of a US telecom, who was based in China, has been charged w/ disrupting video-conference meetings held in May and June this year by parties in the US to commemorate the June 4, 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre in China. justice.gov/opa/pr/china-b…
"No company with significant business interests in China is immune from the coercive power of the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party will use those within its reach to sap the tree of liberty, stifling free speech in China, the United States and elsewhere"
"The allegations in the complaint lay bare the Faustian bargain that the PRC government demands of U.S. technology companies doing business within the PRC’s borders, and the insider threat that those companies face from their own employees in the PRC”