I see a lot of "Putin is happy tonight" tweets and they're misleading at best. I fear that to people without all the context, they support the narrative of Russian collusion, or tacitly insinuate that Putin had a hand in today's events.

Nope. Today was uniquely American. But...
Putin is pleased to see a divided America, to see images that can fuel his whataboutist propaganda and policies, that he can use to undermine the US on the international stage for years to come. He did not engineer it, but he and other adversaries will cheer it.
Please don't @ me with your conspiracy theories. I've had enough of them for a day if not a lifetime.
My last tweet/s before bed:

For my book (in an excerpt you can read here: politico.com/news/magazine/…) I tell the story of an anti-Trump flash mob supported by the IRA, unbeknownst to the protestors.

(Thread continues...)
Why do I mention this today? The fact that these folks — whose political views might align with yours more than those of the people who stormed the Capitol today — were supported by the IRA doesn’t make their views any less legitimate or deeply held.
Yes, I am sure Russia amplified some of the rhetoric that today’s mobs espoused. But we can’t blame Russia for it, or for inciting it. The blame there rests with the President, with officials who wouldn’t distance themselves from conspiracy theories, racism, or extremism...
...with the social media platforms who provided the infrastructure for it to spread.

Russia didn’t create American racism just as it didn’t create ethnic tensions in Estonia or homophobia in Poland. It benefits from all those phenomena, though.
All I’m asking is that on an awful, tragic day in American history, we take responsibility for how we got here. Let’s think about the implications of what it means for the US on the world stage, yes, but not undermine all of the sovereign choices we’ve made to reach this moment.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nina Jankowicz

Nina Jankowicz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wiczipedia

3 Jan
Here you have it, ladies and gents, last year’s hit single, the Failed Autocrat Flex.

Kudos to Raffensperger for telling Trump, “Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is, the data you have is wrong.”
washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
This is a more forthright version of the Zelensky phone call, and further confirmation that this sort of bullying is how Trump has behaved his entire time in office. The question is...
...Americans, GOP elected officials, do you care now that what is at stake is our own democracy and not some faraway country’s?
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct 20
Amid last night's storm of Bad Things you might have missed this Bad Thing:

Trump appointee Michael Pack has eliminated the US Agency for Global Media's editorial firewall, which protected networks like @VOANews, @RFERL, etc from political influence.

npr.org/2020/10/27/928…
The calling card of these networks -- I know, I've lived and worked in the places they serve -- is that they provide independent, fact-based news where little to none exists.
Putin has long critiqued VOA and RFERL as propaganda mouthpieces, and has claimed that their very existence neutralizes any Western critiques on Russia's state-run media and lack of free speech.

Well, Michael Pack is adding fuel to that whataboutism fire now.
Read 8 tweets
26 Oct 20
Look, if you're going to use scare quotes around my title and doubt my committment to nonpartisanship when discussing the threat of disinformation, that's an (unfair) editorial choice, but at least don't inaccurately define disinformation:
Disinformation = the use of false OR MISLEADING information with MALIGN INTENT

Misinformation = false or misleading information spread without malign intent

Hacked materials can absolutely be part of an online influence campaign.
PS The most successful disinformation often includes a kernel of truth. From HOW TO LOSE THE INFORMATION WAR:

(US and Int'l purchase links: wiczipedia.com)
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct 20
Last night was nuts so let's talk about this statement a bit more in depth in the light of day, with coffee in hand ☕️

DNI Ratcliffe says Iran spoofed Proud Boys emails and used publicly available voter records to intimidate voters in FL and AK.

(cont)

washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
Ratcliffe also says "Russia has access to voter information" (as it is public and easy to obtain), but after spending minutes describing the disturbing Iranian operation, doesn't really explain anything else we're seeing related to Russian influence campaigns.
This paints a confusing picture to the non-expert, IMO; it looks like "Iran did this horrible thing, Russia has some files."

Meanwhile, we know Russia has been interfering in political processes around the world for over a decade. Its US operations never stopped after 2016.
Read 8 tweets
30 Sep 20
Hi. Multiple-time election observer here. You don't just send your supporters into polling places to "go and watch." If a leader of a foreign country did that, international organizations would be extraordinarily concerned.
Election observation is not something anyone can simply *go and do.* It requires training. It requires restraint. The fact that the President is encouraging his supporters to "go and watch" is inviting voter intimidation and potentially violence.
One of the things we look for when we are visiting polling stations in foreign countries is large crowds that are clearly there to agitate for one party or another. This is an indication that something is very wrong, that one group is trying to keep another away from the polls.
Read 5 tweets
25 Sep 20
Reading @sobieraj's CREDIBLE THREAT; am just a few pages in and already so many striking passages.

"We don't really see people lashing out at people; we primarily see men lashing out at women, particularly woman from historically marginalized groups."

global.oup.com/academic/produ…
THIS Image
Reader, I laughed. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!