#DivisionOfLAbor, we love it! Except it *does* make it a lot harder to provide for our own wants directly. We live by exchanging and cooperating with others. (I.iv.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
#AdamSmith is too smart to think all this exchanging and cooperating got worked out easily from the very beginning. There must have been bumps in the road. (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Butchers could have so much meat to trade with bakers/brewers that they could end up with an unusable surplus of bread/beer. That stalls trade. Smart people would work to have a supply of an always-useful trade item on hand. (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
(We, the SmithTweeters, have never encountered a surplus of bread or beer we couldn't handle. But let’s assume Smith knows what he’s talking about.) (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
This is how we get money, folks! We want a stable, always desirable, easily stored, and easily transportable thing we can trade for other stuff! (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Cows were probably the earliest form of money, but it’s a lot easier to put coins and bills in your back pocket. Let’s not even talk about making change. (I.iv.3–6) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Many of the things that make a coin a coin were developed to prevent counterfeiting and theft—stamped surfaces, milled edges, and so on. But it’s still easier than weighing out piles of metal. Which is still easier than cows. (I.iv.7–8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The minute you get princes and sovereign states involved, you know there’s going to be trouble. They corrupt the currency whenever they can get away with it, says Smith. (I.iv.10) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Now, after casually explaining the origin of money, Smith decides to just go ahead and define value while he’s at it. Why not? Just your average book chapter, really. (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets#ValueHowDoesItWork
Water has high use value. We all need it. But there’s so much of it that it has very little exchange value. Diamonds are the opposite. (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets#ValueHowDoesItWork
We think it’s very charming when Smith warns everyone that he might be about to get kinda boring, but it’ll all be worth it if you just stick with him. (I.iv.18) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets#BuckleUp
“I am always willing to run some hazard of being tedious in order to be sure that I am perspicuous.” It’s okay, Dr. Smith. We are here for the tedium *and* the perspicuity. Bring it! (I.iv.18) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets#BuckleUp
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wages, profits, and rents have “natural rates” regulated by the general conditions of the society in which they exist. (I.vii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
When the price of any commodity = price of rent + profit + labor + price of getting it to market, the commodity is sold at its “natural price.” (I.vii.4–5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And that all means the commodity has been sold for what it is worth—what it really costs. (I.vii.5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
OK! Who's ready to talk at great length and in great detail about prices? #AdamSmith, that's who! (I.v) #BuckleUp because this is the first of three chapters Smith prepped us for yesterday. (I.v) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The caricature version of the #LaborTheoryOfValue is that the longer you work on a thing, the more it must be worth. This is obviously wrong, and Smith (and Marx, btw) would agree that it's wrong. (I.v.1–18) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Today we come to the topic @EconTalker has called one of the more underemphasized lessons from #AdamSmith: That the Division of Labor is limited by the Extent of the Market. a.k.a Book 1 Chapter 3. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We love ya, Smith, but we see why people don't dwell on this chapter. Unless they are really into the navigable waterways of the late 18th century. (I.iii.3–8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets#RiverEnthusiastsRejoice
The first two paragraphs of this chapter are the meatiest. Then things get a little...#WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Divsion of labor, Smith said yesterday, is responsible for a whole heckuva lot. But who thought of it? Nobody! It's "not originally the effect of any human wisdom, which foresees and intends that general opulence to which it gives occasion." (I.ii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
There's no mastermind behind economic exchange, our "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another" (I.ii.1) arises out of our natural tendency to persuade one another and better our condition. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We have to pause now, because we have to have a whole new tweet thread on #AdamSmith and “savage nations,” because he’s going to keep using this kind of phrase, so we need to talk about it. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Please know that your friendly SmithTweeters give heavy side-eye to Smith’s use of phrases like “savage nations” and “naked savages” and so on. They are obviously shocking to the modern ear, and they should be. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
“Well, it’s the 18th century, what do you expect?” just isn't a sufficient explanation. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Here we go! Tweeting our way through #WealthOfNations! It’s a marathon, not a sprint, so be sure to stretch, stay hydrated, and keep a steady pace. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
That’s one heck of a first sentence, Dr. Smith. No dithering here. The division of labor is the secret sauce that increases productivity. (I.i.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We always forget the pin factory comes this early and that Smith looks at it not because pins are important (though they are!) but because it’s a small industry that you can look at all at once.(I.i.3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets